Sentences with phrase «federal cost sharing»

(5) FEDERAL COST SHARE.

(5) FEDERAL COST SHARE.

Not exact matches

Cost - sharing - reduction payments are made to insurers to offset some of their costs for providing discount insurance plans to Americans who earn up to 200 % of the federal poverty limit.

The federal government will keep up to $ 100 million on the new taxes as part of a cost sharing split that will see three - quarters of cannabis tax revenue flow to provinces and territories.

It continues to be important that provincial and regional commitments are made to fully participate in cost - sharing of the Federal Government's Public Transit Infrastructure Fund.

Heritage Action and more than a dozen other organizations said attempts to subsidize extra-pricy customers with federal tax dollars or restore «cost - sharing» payments that...

We use the application information you choose to provide to determine eligibility for enrollment in a qualified health plan through the Federal Health Insurance Marketplace, Medicaid, CHIP, advance premium tax credits and cost sharing reductions, and certifications of exemption from the individual shared responsibility requirement.

75, the federal government also introduced virtually all of the major policy innovations that make up Canada's system of social programs: Canada - wide Medicare, universal pensions, the modern unemployment insurance system, and cost - sharing with the provinces for higher education and welfare.

New York state last month passed a similar measure that makes it illegal to advertise apartments for fewer than 30 days in New York City, and lawmakers have pushed the federal government to take a closer look at Airbnb and other home - sharing sites on accusations of creating housing shortages and driving up rental costs.

If Prior is right in his thesis that the federal government will aim to share the fiscal burden of health costs with the users of the healthcare system then health insurance companies will be paying out more money.

Second, there needs to be some mechanism, such as the cost - shared financing programs established by Tom Kent and Lester Pearson with the support of Tommy Douglas, to guarantee on - going federal investment conditional on provincial obedience to national principles around minimum standards.

Under Obamacare, people who earn too much for Medicaid but are still low - income — up to 250 percent of the federal poverty line, about $ 30,000 for one person — receive cost - sharing reductions for their private insurance.

That legislation would guarantee federal payments to health insurers for what are called cost - sharing reductions, discounts that insurers are required to provide to their lowest - income customers, for the next two years.

The Federal Reserve's decision to restrict the growth of Wells Fargo until it improves its corporate governance practices sent shares of the bank sharply lower in after - hours trading, costing its biggest shareholder, Berkshire Hathaway, close to $ 2 billion.

But if schools set prices without including a share of such costs, revenues may not be sufficient to cover the total costs of competitive foods, resulting in a funding gap that must be filled from other sources, including federal funds.

When schools offer both a school meals program and competitive foods, the federal government does not need to underwrite all of the operating costs of the entire program; it is reasonable to expect the revenue generated by competitive foods to cover a share of production, service, and overhead that can reasonably be attributed to providing those foods.

Many school districts and community users rely on a combination of federal and local funding, as well as various partnerships, to offset costs associated with shared use of school kitchens.

In response to a lawsuit by the House GOP, however, a federal court ruled in May 2016 that funding for the cost - sharing reductions was never properly appropriated by Congress.

Kinderhook, NY — April 5, 2016... Citing New York's outrageous property taxes as a major cause of Upstate's economic decline, Congressional candidate John Faso (R - Kinderhook) today announced that, if elected, he will introduce legislation amending federal law (42 USC 1396a) to eliminate a state's ability to impose a local government share of Medicaid costs.

This will cut critical federal funding known as Disproportionate Share Hospital payments that reimburses hospitals through the Medicaid program for uncompensated health care costs.

While federal law permits such cost - sharing, only New York has taken it to such extremes.

A former insurance executive, Gregorius enjoys delving into the details of capped Medicaid expenses and cost - sharing plans, the possible effects of federal block grants versus needs payments, and ensuring that people make decisions based on real information, and not just emotions or campaign promises.

The cost of the project, expected to be completed in late 2022 — originally 2021 — has steadily increased from an estimated $ 579 million to the most recent $ 615 million estimate, making the federal government's share about $ 400 million; the state's share about $ 154 million; and the city's share about $ 62 million.

The cost of the project, expected to be completed in late 2022 — originally 2021 — has steadily increased from an estimated $ 579 million to the most recent $ 615 million estimate as of Wednesday, making the federal government's share about $ 400 million; the state's share about $ 154 million; and the city's share about $ 62 million.

Indeed, in many ways the budget process this year has been similar to ones in years past, except in one crucial respect: Mr. Cuomo's opening salvo, his executive budget, proposed shifting to New York City nearly $ 500 million in costs for the City University of New York system and requiring City Hall to contribute a larger share of the payments for the federal Medicaid program.

After railing against a plan that would have required the state to pick up the county share of Medicaid costs, Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Thursday has backed an alternative for federal government action.

Unlike most states, New York shares its portion of Medicaid costs with the counties, and the trend lines should concern every taxpayer: With federal economic stimulus funds running out and federal health insurance changes, 16 million more Americans are expected join the 60 million now enrolled in Medicaid by 2014.

Cuomo and House Democrats from New York — including Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, D - Cold Spring — have argued the federal government should reimburse the state for the counties» Medicaid cost share if it wants to ease the property - tax burden on county taxpayers in New York.

He said the federal government's share of local infrastructure costs used to be greater.

«By reaching this federal funding threshold for post-storm recovery costs, the financial impact will be lowered considerably for the non-federal share of repairing and restoring our communities.

Congress failed to rescind Disproportionate Share Hospital payment cuts that became effective on October 1, reducing critical federal funding that reimburses hospitals through the Medicaid program for uncompensated health care costs.

The federal share is no less than 75 percent of the eligible cost for emergency measures and permanent restoration.

Hein is an interesting one to watch, given that he's calling on the state to pick up the local share of costs from damage, a move that's received a lukewarm from response so far from the governor (Cuomo has said he's doing everything he can to get federal aid, but everyone's going to have to pitch in on the effort).

Cuomo said that Congress failed to rescind Disproportionate Share Hospital payment cuts that became effective on October 1, reducing critical federal funding that reimburses hospitals through the Medicaid program for uncompensated health care costs.

Hochul says that loss would be compounded by an amendment from New York Rep. Chris Collins that would end federal reimbursements for the share of Medicaid costs that New York counties currently pay, effectively leaving the state with a $ 2.3 billion tab.

He has bemoaned a proposal that would force the state to pick up the county share of Medicaid costs, lest it risk losing federal funding of an equal amount.

Cuomo said as recently as last month that he wanted a promise from the federal government that it would pay «the lion's share» of the project's cost.

The project was terminated as a Federal project due to a lag in the required non-Federal cost - share.

Federal funding is also available on a cost - sharing basis for hazard mitigation measures statewide.

The declaration means federal funding is available to the State and to tribal and eligible local governments and certain private nonprofit organizations on a cost - sharing basis for emergency work and the repair or replacement of facilities damaged by the flooding in the counties of Jefferson, Niagara, Orleans, Oswego, St. Lawrence, and Wayne.

The state is able to cover the local share of costs through funding put in place by the Legislature and additional federal funds requested by the Governor.

Recently, the federal government announced a draft statement that directly addresses this issue by offering explicit funding in research grants to support the costs of sharing biomaterials and other forms of data (see the National Institutes of Health's Draft Statement on Sharing Researchsharing biomaterials and other forms of data (see the National Institutes of Health's Draft Statement on Sharing ResearchSharing Research Data).

The federal government will account for more than 63 percent of this total, or about $ 1.5 trillion, reflecting expanded Medicaid eligibility, premium and cost - sharing subsidies through the Health Insurance Marketplaces (exchanges), and growth in Medicare enrollment as baby boomers continue to enter the program.

And the federal money that is available comes with a cost - sharing requirement that critics say is prohibitively high.

Those costs have been shifted to employers and the federal government, whose share grew from 31 percent of costs to 42 percent over those same three decades.

Of the children, 25.9 percent were enrolled in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program; 21.7 percent were commercially insured with household incomes at or below 250 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL); and 18.2 percent had higher cost - sharing levels for all services (e.g. $ 75 or more for an emergency department visit).

Bear in mind that states and districts account for the lion's share of special - education funding and that this part of their education budgets has ballooned in recent decades, both because the special - ed pupil rolls have swelled and because costs in this realm are exceptionally difficult to keep within bounds (in part because of federal «cost - may - not - be-considered» and «maintenance - of - effort» rules).

During Bush's administration, expenditures from federal coffers edged upward from 10 percent to 11 percent of total spending on K — 12 education (with the remainder of the costs shared about equally by state and local governments).

[2] The original Title V aimed at strengthening SEAs has been eliminated, but most major federal funding streams now permit states to set aside a share of the funds that would otherwise go out to school districts for administrative costs.

Up until this year, the federal government has paid 100 percent of the costs for newly eligible individuals and maintained 50 percent cost sharing for individuals eligible for Medicaid under pre-ACA rules.