Not exact matches
It points out that CFPB's reply does not
challenge the Supreme
Court's recognition that a federal court does not have jurisdiction in cases where the government lacks an authorized representa
Court's recognition that a
federal court does not have jurisdiction in cases where the government lacks an authorized representa
court does not have jurisdiction in
cases where the government lacks an authorized representative.
The
federal agency has 90 days to challenge the decision before the Federal Court of Appeal, a move that could drag the case out even further, and delay any
federal agency has 90 days to
challenge the decision before the
Federal Court of Appeal, a move that could drag the case out even further, and delay any
Federal Court of Appeal, a move that could drag the
case out even further, and delay any refund.
The last - minute rewrite prompted a
federal judge in September to dismiss
challenges by Wheaton College and Belmont Abbey, but the D.C. Circuit
Court of Appeals agreed to consider the
cases.
If a state law or local law is thought to be in violation of a
federal law or the
federal Constitution, it can be
challenged in
court as such by someone who is deemed by the
court to have standing to bring the
case.
In this
case, the
federal mandate for individuals to purchase health insurance or else pay a penalty was
challenged in
court.
A
federal high
court sitting in Abuja, has dismissed a
case challenging the veracity of the academic credentials of President Muhammadu Buhari.
Hanna joins former Utah governor and presidential candidate Jon Huntsman, HP CEO Meg Whitman and ex-Vice President Dick Cheney in signing the amicus, which is being filed with the Supreme
Court as justices prepare to take on several court cases challenging same - sex marriage laws, including the controversial Proposition 8 measure in California and the federal Defense of Marriage
Court as justices prepare to take on several
court cases challenging same - sex marriage laws, including the controversial Proposition 8 measure in California and the federal Defense of Marriage
court cases challenging same - sex marriage laws, including the controversial Proposition 8 measure in California and the
federal Defense of Marriage Act.
The Supreme
Court decision in the McDonnell
case is expected to make it more difficult for the
federal government to prosecute public corruption
cases, a prospect Chief Justice John Roberts
challenged in his majority opinion.
WAMC's Dr. Alan Chartok discusses the Supreme
Court's decision not to hear the Trump Administration's appeal of a
Federal Judge's ruling on DACA and the political clout of labor unions being
challenged in the Mark Janus Supreme
Court case that began Monday.
Spence added the white - collar union faces
challenges including attrition, closures of state facilities that employed members, and a looming
federal court case contesting the ability of public sector unions to collect dues.
The ECOWAS Community
Court of Justice dismissed a preliminary objection filed by the Federal Government of Nigeria challenging the jurisdiction of the court to hear a case of breach of fundamental human rights filed by Nnamdi
Court of Justice dismissed a preliminary objection filed by the
Federal Government of Nigeria
challenging the jurisdiction of the
court to hear a case of breach of fundamental human rights filed by Nnamdi
court to hear a
case of breach of fundamental human rights filed by Nnamdi Kanu.
Courts tend to defer to
federal agencies on interpreting statutes like Dickey - Wicker, and the fact that the HHS interpretation has been consistent and wasn't
challenged in
court until now may weaken the plaintiffs»
case.
These drug pricing discrepancies could become even more important depending on the outcome of the pending Supreme
Court case King vs. Burwell, which
challenges the legitimacy of
federal health - care subsidies and could leave as many as 8 million Americans without subsidies and uninsured in 2016.
A
federal appeals
court last week declined to rehear a
case over a lawsuit
challenging a Hawaii private school's policy of serving only native Hawaiian students.
To discern the larger contours of the legal climate facing schools, we analyzed all appellate - level
federal and state
court cases in which school efforts to discipline and control students have been
challenged.
That's why a group of parents and students in Connecticut, with support from the nonprofit students» rights organization Students Matter, filed a
case last month in
federal court challenging their state's laws «that knowingly and actively prevent students from accessing even minimally acceptable public school options.»
In early
cases, parents successfully
challenged AUPs in
federal trial
courts in Missouri (Beussink ex rel.
NSBA is pleased to report that a
federal district
court judge in New York has issued a nationwide preliminary injunction in Vidal v. Nielsen (New York v. Trump), a
case in which NSBA and other national educational organizations filed an amicus brief supporting plaintiffs
challenging the DACA rescission.
In this capacity, Mr. Geier has been responsible for developing DOT's positions in numerous Supreme
Court and lower federal court cases that have included a wide range of constitutional and administrative law issues as well as regulatory challe
Court and lower
federal court cases that have included a wide range of constitutional and administrative law issues as well as regulatory challe
court cases that have included a wide range of constitutional and administrative law issues as well as regulatory
challenges.
On Tuesday a
federal court in Washington D.C. heard oral arguments on a historic
case — a legal
challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency's science - based determination that heat - trapping greenhouse gas pollution is a threat to our health and well - being.
In this
case, Microsoft
challenged the strength of that presumption — arguing that a low «preponderance» standard for proving invalidity should be sufficient rather than the higher «clear and convincing» standard required by the
Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit.
Cathy Cash, senior editor, discusses a
case before the appeals
court, Coalition for Responsible Regulation versus EPA, which consolidates four major
challenges to the
federal government's ability to tackle greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources for the first time.
In an ongoing
case challenging the centre's decision to make Aadhaar mandatory for government welfare schemes, the Supreme
Court bench asked the West Bengal state counsel: «In a
federal structure,...
We also represent clients in
federal court where we have successfully obtained defense verdicts in jury trials in premises liability
cases despite the
challenges of litigating in a pro-plaintiff jurisdiction.
In July 2014, Heiltsuk and Kitasoo Xai'Xais sought leave from the
Federal Court of Appeal to
challenge the Enbridge pipeline approval, and were granted leave to have their
case heard on September 26, 2014.
And if all of this is not enough to make the
case significant, it also may reveal the justices» views on presidential power and immigration that could be relevant to other issues pending in the lower
courts, such as President Trump's repeal of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and the
challenges to President Trump's threatening to withhold
federal funds from cities and states that do not cooperate with immigration officials.
«As first noted here late last night, in today's edition of The Recorder of San Francisco, attorney Cyrus Sanai has an interesting essay entitled «Taking the Kozinski
Challenge» that begins, «The fiercest battle within the
federal appellate
courts these days is not over abortion or gay marriage, but the arcane question of whether an attorney may cite the unpublished
case law of an appellate
court as the binding law of the circuit.»»
Currently, certificate
cases based on claims of terrorism are the subject of ongoing legal and procedural
challenges in our
Federal Court.
The
Federal Circuit's In re Micron Tech opinion that TC Heartland changed the law controlling proper venue in patent
cases provides an opportunity for patent defendants to
challenge venue even if they failed to raise it before the Supreme
Court issued its TC Heartland opinion.
The Supreme
Court's decision in TC Heartland represents a sea of change in the analysis to determine proper venue in patent
cases.3 Soon after TC Heartland, the
Federal Circuit provided a roadmap to determine if venue is proper in a patent
case post-TC Heartland.4 However, an important question remained — may accused infringers who failed to raise the defense of improper venue pre-TC Heartland now
challenge venue post-TC Heartland.
These were the David - versus - Goliath
cases in which HyperLaw, then a publisher of Supreme
Court and
federal circuit
cases on CD - ROM,
challenged West's longstanding claim of ownership and won.
Since Haida Nation, the Supreme
Court of Canada's seminal case articulating the duty to consult framework in 2004, there have been hundreds of court cases in which Aboriginal groups have gone to court to challenge an alleged lack of adequate consultation and / or accommodation on decisions by the federal, provincial, and territorial governm
Court of Canada's seminal
case articulating the duty to consult framework in 2004, there have been hundreds of
court cases in which Aboriginal groups have gone to court to challenge an alleged lack of adequate consultation and / or accommodation on decisions by the federal, provincial, and territorial governm
court cases in which Aboriginal groups have gone to
court to challenge an alleged lack of adequate consultation and / or accommodation on decisions by the federal, provincial, and territorial governm
court to
challenge an alleged lack of adequate consultation and / or accommodation on decisions by the
federal, provincial, and territorial governments.
CCLA recently intervened before the Ontario
Court of Appeal in a
case that
challenges one aspect of our
federal electoral system.
Paul Halvorson is the Portfolio Management Coordinator at the Administrative Office of the United States
Courts, where he works with staff to better understand the case management challenges of the federal courts and develop IT solutions to meet
Courts, where he works with staff to better understand the
case management
challenges of the
federal courts and develop IT solutions to meet
courts and develop IT solutions to meet them.
VANCOUVER — This morning, the BC Supreme
Court released its judgment in an historic court case challenging the use of solitary confinement in Canada's federal pri
Court released its judgment in an historic
court case challenging the use of solitary confinement in Canada's federal pri
court case challenging the use of solitary confinement in Canada's
federal prisons.
BLAG's zealous advocacy in support of Section 3, along with the myriad other
cases winding their way through the
federal courts challenging that section, convinced a majority of the Supreme
Court to address the constitutional issue.
His civil practice has included numerous
cases involving
challenges under the Administrative Procedure Act to actions of various
federal agencies, including successfully arguing before the Supreme
Court in the matter of Seatrain Shipbuilding Corp., v. Shell Oil Co., 444 U.S. 572 (1980).
Judge Joel F. Dubina's response to the high
court came in a
case in which
federal prosecutors in Florida had
challenged as too lenient a seven - year sentence for a distributor of child pornography.
Notable mandates include constitutional
challenges against the
federal government, representing the Canadian Judicial Council in the review of Lori Douglas in the Federal Court, and representing Mississauga, Ont., mayor Hazel McCallion in her conflict of interes
federal government, representing the Canadian Judicial Council in the review of Lori Douglas in the
Federal Court, and representing Mississauga, Ont., mayor Hazel McCallion in her conflict of interes
Federal Court, and representing Mississauga, Ont., mayor Hazel McCallion in her conflict of interest
case.
The
challenge succeeded at the
Federal Court but was limited only to Métis people at the
Federal Court of Appeal, which determined that non-status Indians should be assessed on a
case - by -
case basis.
He is an accomplished author and lecturer and is consulted by the media and other immigration lawyers and consultants on immigration matters and
challenging immigration
cases, appeals, and
federal court matters.
Laws such as these have been
challenged in
court across the United States and have been overturned as unconstitutional in some cases, including in federal district court in Alabama, and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Mississ
court across the United States and have been overturned as unconstitutional in some
cases, including in
federal district
court in Alabama, and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Mississ
court in Alabama, and the Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals in Mississ
Court of Appeals in Mississippi.
The
court is expected to announce shortly whether it will hear Carhart v. Gonzales, another case challenging the federal abortion ban, and the Bush administration has 90 days to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Planned Parenthood v. Gonz
court is expected to announce shortly whether it will hear Carhart v. Gonzales, another
case challenging the
federal abortion ban, and the Bush administration has 90 days to ask the U.S. Supreme
Court to hear Planned Parenthood v. Gonz
Court to hear Planned Parenthood v. Gonzales.
(Bloomberg)-- The U.S. Supreme
Court gave landowners a new avenue to
challenge some
federal regulatory decisions affecting their property rights, in a
case that three conservative justices said raised troubling questions about government...