Sentences with phrase «federal court decision affirming»

Not exact matches

Monday's ruling affirmed a lower federal court decision that also dismissed Kimzey's claim that Yelp should be held liable for distributing reviews to search engines.

As a federal court stated in a 2011 decision upholding the foreign national prohibition statute and regulation — a decision affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court: «It is fundamental to the definition of our national political community that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to participate in, and thus may be excluded from, activities of democratic self - government.&rcourt stated in a 2011 decision upholding the foreign national prohibition statute and regulation — a decision affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court: «It is fundamental to the definition of our national political community that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to participate in, and thus may be excluded from, activities of democratic self - government.&rCourt: «It is fundamental to the definition of our national political community that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to participate in, and thus may be excluded from, activities of democratic self - government.»

The Kaduna Division of the Court of Appeal today affirmed the decision of the Federal High Court Kano which ordered the interim forfeiture of...

A five - man panel of the apex court led by Justice Tanko Muhammad unanimously affirmed the February 20, 2015, judgment of the Court of Appeal in Lagos which had overturned the Federal High Court's decision striking out the chacourt led by Justice Tanko Muhammad unanimously affirmed the February 20, 2015, judgment of the Court of Appeal in Lagos which had overturned the Federal High Court's decision striking out the chaCourt of Appeal in Lagos which had overturned the Federal High Court's decision striking out the chaCourt's decision striking out the charges.

Ruling affirms lower court decision denying challenge to federal research on human embryonic stem cells

The federal district court affirmed the Department of Education's decision, as did the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, applying the Supreme Court's reasoning in the Rowley decicourt affirmed the Department of Education's decision, as did the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, applying the Supreme Court's reasoning in the Rowley deciCourt of Appeals, applying the Supreme Court's reasoning in the Rowley deciCourt's reasoning in the Rowley decision.

The Court's 5 - to - 4 decision in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico affirms an appellate - court decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district court for tCourt's 5 - to - 4 decision in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico affirms an appellate - court decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district court for tcourt decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district court for tcourt for trial.

The court also stated in Brown v. Board of Education II in 1955 that the integration would proceed «with all deliberate speed,» affirming its 1954 decision and signaling that state and local education officials needed to work with federal judges to manage integration of public schools.

«That panel decision was subsequently affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which set aside an $ 86.5 million infringement verdict won by the company,» says the NLJ.

The German patent office will most likely treat the Federal Patent Court's opinion on the photo gallery patent as binding case law for the purposes of the utility model revocation proceedings; if not, Apple can always ask the Federal Patent Court to review the decision, and a panel presumably consisting of partly the same people would probably affirm the previous decision in the new context.

2016), the Federal Circuit recently affirmed a district court's decision declining to grant attorney's fees because «there was nothing obviously unreasonable» about the losing litigant's position, which the district court found to be «non-frivolous.»

The Court affirmed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, holding that the USPTO acted within its authority in promulgating rules requiring the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to...

The nation's only court that operates in secrecy, the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, may not have a Web site of its own, like other federal appeals courts, but its decision this week affirming the government's broad power to investigate suspected spies and terrorists made it onto thecourt that operates in secrecy, the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, may not have a Web site of its own, like other federal appeals courts, but its decision this week affirming the government's broad power to investigate suspected spies and terrorists made it onto theCourt of Review, may not have a Web site of its own, like other federal appeals courts, but its decision this week affirming the government's broad power to investigate suspected spies and terrorists made it onto the Web.

For example, the Federal Court of Justice affirmed the nullity ruling on Apple's slide - to - unlock patent, but disagreed with the Federal Patent Court for fear that its decision contained at least one statement that would get too many user interface patents invalidated.

He handles appeals in both state and federal courts, representing clients seeking to affirm a favorable trial court decision as well as those whose goal it is to obtain a reversal.

The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's decision in Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., 126 F. 3d 1420 (Fed.

The decision affirmed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and endorsed the USPTO's positions on both issues.

In a unanimous decision written by Justice Breyer, the Supreme Court affirmed the Federal Circuit on both issues.

The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit's decision, resolving a conflict among Circuit Courts regarding the interplay between contractual limitations provisions required by most states» insurance laws and federal case law regarding accrual of ERISA claims.

HB 2201 Prohibits state courts from enforcing federal court rulings unless decision is affirmed by Congress.

FlashPoint appealed the Commission's determination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which affirmed the Commission's decision in favor of HTC less than a week after oral arguments.

After a long anticipated wait, on July 14, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada («SCC»), delivered decision affirming that non-unionized federal employees are entitled to comparable protections to those afforded to unionized employees.

On June 6, 2017, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas dismissing a declaratory judgment action filed against Brooks Kushman's client Ford Global Technologies LLC by New World International, Inc..

In an unusual en banc decision rendered without requesting briefing from the parties, the United States, or interested amici curiae, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently affirmed several rulings in favor of Apple Inc. in its ongoing smartphone patent war with Samsung.

The Court affirmed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, holding that the USPTO acted within its authority in promulgating rules requiring the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to construe patent claims in inter partes review proceedings under the «broadest reasonable interpretation» (or «BRI») standard.

The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment, holding, in a 6 - 5 decision, that laches could still apply in a patent case, and that Petrella did not apply, because the patent damages statute was different from the copyright statue.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently affirmed a decision by the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) invalidating two patents after an inter partes review proceeding, even though the decision partially rested on references and evidence not disclosed in the challenger's petition for review or the PTAB's decision to institute.

The decision was recently affirmed by a federal court of appeals.

The Court of Appeal affirmed, following the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Apotex Inc. v. Allergan Inc., 2016 FCA 155, that «Evidence of the actual state of mind or subjective intention of the parties is irrelevant to the existence of a valid contract and its terms» (See para. 35).

The District Court ruled by summary judgment that SCA's suit was barred by laches (an equitable doctrine that prevents the plaintiff from unreasonably delaying in bringing an action), a decision that was affirmed by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

«[T] he weight of authority suggests that accurate news reporting — even when it is likely to have an adverse impact on the subjects of the report — usually does not give rise to an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress»: Yesterday, a unanimous three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a decision affirming a federal district court's dismissal of claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual assCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a decision affirming a federal district court's dismissal of claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual asscourt's dismissal of claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual assault.

Following Covington's argument in April 2015, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's decision, securing the clients» victory.

In a long running legal battle over patent infringement allegations, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a California federal court's decision that Move's websites, including REALTOR®.com, do not infringe Real Estate Alliance, Ltd.'s pFederal Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a California federal court's decision that Move's websites, including REALTOR®.com, do not infringe Real Estate Alliance, Ltd.'s patCourt of Appeals affirmed a California federal court's decision that Move's websites, including REALTOR®.com, do not infringe Real Estate Alliance, Ltd.'s pfederal court's decision that Move's websites, including REALTOR®.com, do not infringe Real Estate Alliance, Ltd.'s patcourt's decision that Move's websites, including REALTOR®.com, do not infringe Real Estate Alliance, Ltd.'s patents.

While the EPA made several changes to the proposed rule in response to public comments, the final rule still expands federal jurisdiction over more U.S. waters beyond past practice, guidance and the limitations affirmed by two Supreme Court decisions.

The bankruptcy court dismissed the lawsuit, and this decision was affirmed by a federal district court.