Although several
federal court decisions indicate such fees are legal, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development disagrees and may challenge your company if it adopts a commission - plus - flat - fee form of compensation.
Not exact matches
Judge Crotty
indicated that although he was obliged to follow the U.S. Supreme
Court's decision in McCutcheon v. FEC, which recently invalidated federal aggregate contribution limits, he disagreed with the court's analysis and lamented that regular citizens «are too often drowned out by the few who have great resources.&r
Court's
decision in McCutcheon v. FEC, which recently invalidated
federal aggregate contribution limits, he disagreed with the
court's analysis and lamented that regular citizens «are too often drowned out by the few who have great resources.&r
court's analysis and lamented that regular citizens «are too often drowned out by the few who have great resources.»
Recent confessions released by
federal courts indicate that corruption from the construction companies involved financed the last two presidential election campaigns, thus providing a rationale for detachment of
decisions from normal economic logic.
The label is «proactive» because the
decision to elevate the matter to this
decision format is made by the
Court itself, without any clear external trigger (a
federal reference, a judicial institutional issue) to
indicate clearly and ahead of time that a case was likely to be decided «By the
Court.»
First Arizona, now Idaho wants to ban state
court judges from enforcing
federal court decisions; state AG
indicates bill violates Supremacy Clause