Not exact matches
A
decision by a
federal appeals
court this week dealt another blow to supporters of an Obama - era rule
intended to protect retirement savers.
Sequenom, meanwhile, has served notice that it «vigorously disagrees» with the
decision and
intends to appeal to the
Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., which specializes in patent disputes.
In a pivotal
decision on 10 December 2004, the Swiss
Federal Supreme
Court ruled that the relevant provision of the draft law prohibiting third party funding should be set aside, on the basis that it would restrict freedom of commerce in a way that was disproportionate to its
intended purpose.
The proposed amendment is
intended to overturn a 1997 Supreme
Court decision, Printz v. United States, which said states can't be forced to participate in the
federal system of gun background checks, according to coverage of the book by the Associated Press and Business Insider.
In a
decision issued on July 27, 2015 but not yet published (but available here as a PDF), the
Federal Court of Canada has certified a class action against the Government of Canada for disclosing the personal health information of participants in the «Marihuana Medical Access Program» in a botched mailout that was
intended to advise program participants about changes to the regulation, which ironically where said to protect privacy and safety.
Rather the
decision referred to an earlier case that held «In extraordinary cases» a
court should «hesitate before concluding that Congress has
intended such an implicit delegation» to a
federal agency.