Sentences with phrase «federal court does»

It points out that CFPB's reply does not challenge the Supreme Court's recognition that a federal court does not have jurisdiction in cases where the government lacks an authorized representative.

Records from Tulare County and federal courts do not show any lawsuits filed against the company related to the accident.

«Are we being fusspots and nitpickers in trying (so far with limited success) to enforce rules designed to ensure that federal courts do not exceed the limits that the Constitution and federal statutes impose on their jurisdiction?»

However, according to Murphy, the implications for judicial independence resulting from the imposition of shared IT services on our federal courts do not appear to have been considered.

I spent a lot of time in the court room, and because I was in federal court I didn't often see self - represented litigants.

Bayer's strongest argument in the Supreme Court's eyes was the policy argument that if federal courts do not enforce their judgments denying certification, serial relitigation of class certification will result, and defendants will be forced to settle class actions.

Federal courts do not have jurisdiction to hear this case at all.

Some Quebecers say the issue was one of respect for an entirely different system of justice — civil law — in which all members of the Quebec bar and Quebec courts have expertise and few members of the Federal Court do.

The federal courts do not have WestlawNext at this time, and my understanding is that while the Administrative Office in D.C. has discussed it with Thomson - Reuters, there is no plan to purchase it for the federal judiciary in the near future.

Justice Zinn, writing for the court, found that the Federal Court did not have jurisdiction to hear breaches of 4.10, as they were not specifically enumerated in the s. 14 hearing section, or matters not investigated or referred to in the PCC's report.

Unfortunately, civil procedure rules in state and federal courts don't make things easy on trial attorneys: they generally require that post-trial motions be made within weeks after a decision or verdict is rendered.

But the federal courts don't exist to generate business for a particular region.

The Full Federal Court did not agree with this reasoning.

It may be more accurate to say that Justice Olney and the majority of the full Federal Court do not pursue the arguments involving R v Keyn for there are Commonwealth and state statutes that purport to extend the application of the law offshore.

Not exact matches

Clifford has sued Cohen and Trump in federal court in Los Angeles, seeking a ruling that the «hush agreement» she signed in October 2016 was never valid because Trump didn't sign it.

«A few cosmetic changes to the form and rollout of the travel order do not change its original intent,» said a statement from Tech Stands Up, a grassroots group of tech industry workers that was formed after President Trump's initial immigration order, which was halted in federal court.

Verizon, for example, told a federal court in 2013 that it believed in a no - blocking rule, so long as it could charge any online service whatever amount it wanted to get to Verizon's subscribers — and be able to cut off websites that didn't pay up.

Stuart and Susan Silverman are suing Joshua Blackman, Vice Energy LLC, Philip Dade, and Vice Productions in Long Island Federal Court claiming they did $ 20,000 in damage to their summer home, according to Courthouse News.

I don't want to get into that debate all over again, just to note that a federal court has already determined that the piece was newsworthy.

In January, a federal appeals court ruled that because ISPs are not regulated as utilities, equal access regulations could not apply to these providers, as they do with telecommunications carriers under the Communications Act of 1934.

After warning the City of Stockton that its pension obligations did not enjoy a privileged position in federal bankruptcy court, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Klein proceeded to confirm the city's plan of adjustment.

NEW YORK, N.Y. — An Internet company offering inexpensive live broadcast television feeds to computers, tablets and smartphones doesn't violate U.S. copyright law, a divided federal appeals court said Monday.

The federal appeals court in New York ruled that Aereo did not violate the copyrights of broadcasters with its service, but a similar service has been blocked by judges in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.

Voltage then sued those John Does for copyright infringement in Federal Court.

In the Arizona federal court filing posted by The Register, the John Does said they are suing the companies for «intentionally inflicting emotional distress upon Ashley Madison users.»

Trump did not elaborate on how exactly he thought the election would be rigged, though he did make mention of his displeasure that a federal court had struck down a North Carolina voter ID law that the court said was specifically aimed at disenfranchising black voters.

Q. On the reference case the Supreme Court of Canada is slated to hear sometime in the spring, do you plan to file arguments with the court supporting the federal government's posiCourt of Canada is slated to hear sometime in the spring, do you plan to file arguments with the court supporting the federal government's posicourt supporting the federal government's position?

Douglas Hyndman, who heads the Canadian Securities Transition Office that Flaherty set up to push this file, even told Maclean's in an email that the Supreme Court, by directing federal policy - makers to consider regulating systemic risks, shifted their attention «precisely where Canada needs to do a better job to get regulation right.»

The judge said in a 91 - page decision that, while the Army Corps substantially complied with the National Environmental Policy Act, federal permits issued for the pipeline violated the law in some respects, saying in a court order the Corps did not «adequately consider the impacts of an oil spill on fishing rights, hunting rights, or environmental justice.»

In an emailed statement, James Fitz - Morris, a spokesman for Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, said Canada is committed to righting historical wrongs committed against Indigenous people and that the federal government is working to resolve the matter out of court, as it did with the Sixties Scoop survivors» class action.

On Wednesday, November 30, 2016, a federal court from the Northern District of California granted in part the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) motion to enforce a John Doe summons it had served the crypto exchange Coinbase.

In what way do sworn FBI agents operating with a warrant signed by a federal court magistrate behave like fascist thugs who beat up and killed innocents in a genocide?

While Jesner suggests that five justices likely would rule that the federal courts should not recognize an ATS cause of action against American corporations for their overseas activities, several federal appeals courts have exhibited little willingness to limit the scope of ATS liability unless directly ordered to do so by the Supreme Court.

On November 30, 2016, a federal court in the Northern District of California authorized the IRS to serve a John Doe summons on Coinbase, Inc., a virtual currency exchanger.

The good news, for Enbridge and the federal government anyway, is that they don't really have to; accountability at this stage of the environmental process is primarily intended for the ballot box, not the court room.

Canada's Federal Court could be given greater powers to combat unacceptable behaviour by domestic and foreign «patent trolls» — companies that do not make or sell a product but sue other companies for patent infringement based on existing patent rights the troll has secured.

That was the response this week from a Coinbase customer who filed a motion in federal court seeking to block the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from issuing a John Doe summons on Coinbase.

If it makes the payments, Citi will get in Big Trouble with a New York federal court; if it doesn't, Citi will get in Big Trouble with Argentina.

Accordingly, notwithstanding receipt by HP Co. of the IRS private letter ruling and the tax opinions referred to above, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not assert that the distribution and / or certain related transactions do not qualify for tax - free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes or that a court would not sustain such a challenge.

«The IRS offers no explanation as to how the IRS can legitimately use most of these millions of records on hundreds of thousands of users; instead, it claims that as long as it has submitted a declaration from an IRS agent that the IRS «is conducting an investigation to determine the identity and correct federal income tax liabilities of United States persons who conducted transactions in a virtual currency during 2013 - 2015» the Court must find that the Summons does not involve an abuse of process.

Even if regulators do not act, when a presale results in nothing more than profits for its promoter, a disgruntled investor will inevitably make a private securities fraud claim to try and claw back some of their capital; assuming a court will determine a presale of digital tokens to be a private placement of securities, any such federal claim would fall under Rule 10b - 5.

As a federal court stated in a 2011 decision upholding the foreign national prohibition statute and regulation — a decision affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court: «It is fundamental to the definition of our national political community that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to participate in, and thus may be excluded from, activities of democratic self - government.&rcourt stated in a 2011 decision upholding the foreign national prohibition statute and regulation — a decision affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court: «It is fundamental to the definition of our national political community that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to participate in, and thus may be excluded from, activities of democratic self - government.&rCourt: «It is fundamental to the definition of our national political community that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to participate in, and thus may be excluded from, activities of democratic self - government.»

As Compton carefully explains, the court's rulings on moral reform did not lead directly to the New Deal decisions that dealt the final blow to constitutional limitations on federal power.

On February 26 of this year, for instance, eight members of the Court ruled that the federal racketeering statute (popularly known as RICO) did not apply to the efforts of the Pro-Life Action Network to shut down various abortion clinics.

Federal court rules that secular, for - profit corporations do not have a right to free exercise of religion.

That wasn't even Olson's case, but with assists from a federal district court judge who came out as being in a same - sex relationship only after ruling and retiring, and elected officials who chose to forgo their traditional duty to vigorously defend state law, Olson and Boies did succeed in disenfranchising millions of Californians on a procedural technicality.

even if he didn't quite mean it: In the escalating battle between the administration and the judiciary, a federal appeals court apparently is calling the president's bluff — ordering the Justice Department to answer by Thursday whether the Obama Administration believes that the....

I just went to the Family Research Council's «Issues» page and found the lead statement under Marriage and Family, entitled «Why Do Courts (and the Media) Ignore Federal Precedent on Marriage?»

It's a little too late for praying, it's Mrs.Clinton's call to be @ the helm; now, with her hubby Mr.Clinton as VP; and one of you out of all of you, need to tell Romney he's committed fraud, for leaving the Post of so - called gov.that theirs a 2 yr.interval that must be met; the same fo Obama; whom is worst off then Bush Jr.then for none of you to have no Allegiance to be nothing but commander of thieves, since April 4th, 1968 to presently; in the killing of Dr.King Jr.must still go under Oath to all you perjurers; that mustn't go unpunished to the array of charges I have stored up against each of yo on every job, on every public premise; that Obama didn't praywhen he lied to GOD ALMIGHTY in perjury; to have left the seat of sen.to jump to the office; knowing he hadn't a clue what to do; so he got Joe, which is Cheney all over; whom should of been out of public; and he knows that and all the fugitives, even in the Italian led court in DC; that will have to answer to what is -LCB- H.R. 7152 -RCB-; and why they let Olsen for Bush Jr.waste the American's People's time, not to mention all the lives that's been lost; for the tyrannies since 1968 to presently has cost; Vote I, Edward Baltimore; to confirm I; Governor of DC; as of 2/16/12; cause DC; has been a State, already; and all you slaves from State to State; need to snap out of your peonage which is prohibited by Federal Laws; on anybody!!!!!!!

But the board didn't properly apply the war crime complicity law, the federal court said.