Not exact matches
According to the standard account of the matter, the power of judicial review — that is, the authority of the
federal judiciary to invalidate acts of Congress and the President when they are
deemed to be unconstitutional — came to be entrenched in our law by the acceptance, tacit or otherwise, of the Supreme
Court's
ruling in the 1803 case of Marbury v. Madison.
The provision seeks to reverse the recent
federal appeals
court ruling these parents obtained, which held that the regulation patently violated NCLB's unambiguous requirement that only fully prepared teachers be
deemed «highly qualified» and that, as such, teachers still in - training must be publicly disclosed and not concentrated in low - income, high - minority schools.
«By giving scholarship money to students who attend sectarian — but not «pervasively» sectarian - universities,» the
federal appeals
court ruled, «Colorado necessarily and explicitly discriminates among religious institutions, extending scholarships to students at some religious institutions, but not those
deemed too thoroughly «sectarian» by governmental officials.»
As Benefits Canada explains, the
court held that the
federal statute took precedence over the provincial statute,
ruling that «the
deemed trust that gives priority to pension claims under Newfoundland and Labrador's Pension Benefits Act wasn't effective in a liquidation scenario in a [CCAA] proceeding.»