Ottawa says
federal deficit for 2016 - 17 was $ 17.8 billion, CTV News Ticket tossed: Stopped for driving 1 km / h over speed limit, «disrespecting» officer, CTV News
It should not have come to anyone's surprise that the announcement by the Prime Minister that
the federal deficit for 2013 - 14 was $ 5.2 billion, substantially lower than the $ 16.6 billion forecast in the February 2014 budget.
With
the federal deficit for 2010 sitting at $ 53.8 billion and most provinces also facing shortfalls, Manley says tax hikes may be the only way to stem the bleeding.
Not exact matches
Ahead of the 2016
federal budget, I had a list of eight things to watch
for, beyond the size of the
deficit.
Canada's new
Federal Balanced Budget Act allows
for budgetary
deficits when a recession is «has occurred, is occurring or is forecast» — a condition met by TD's recession projections.
Thirteen months later, with Canadians staring at a $ 56 - billion crater in the government's finances, the minister got testy with reporters who were asking
for his response to a report from the Parliamentary Budget Office that predicted a
federal deficit of nearly $ 20 billion in 2013 - 14.
For starters, Prime Minister Stephen Harper has promised to fight the
federal deficit, expected to reach $ 56 billion by fiscal year - end, with «fiscal discipline» instead of tax increases.
The
federal deficit, however, is undebatably swollen, and President Obama has asked the public
for good ideas to be sent his way.
Most outside economic analyses say the type of tax cuts being promoted by Trump would likely fuel even larger
deficits for a
federal government already projected to see its debt steadily rise.
If various personal deductions were eliminated as the plan proposes, it could still leave a $ 2.2 trillion addition to the
deficit over 10 years, according to the analysis from the Committee
for a Responsible
Federal Budget.
The latest
federal forecast, released last October, projected a $ 14.3 - billion
deficit for 2019 - 20 and doubts persist that Tuesday's budget will show a revised timeline
for getting back to black.
Fink said a corporate rate as high as 27 percent could satisfy U.S. businesses» need
for tax relief, while avoiding an increase in the
federal deficit.
According to Congressional Budget Office estimates, enacting the bill would shrink the
federal budget
deficit by $ 175 billion by 2020, lift GDP by 5.4 % over the next 20 years, increase national productivity, balloon the workforce by about 5 % by 2033, raise the return on capital, and (although the CBO didn't put it this way) create a $ 46 billion windfall
for entrepreneurs supplying security operations along the U.S. southern border.
Hungry
for legislative victory after repeated failures in their push to overturn Obamacare, many Republicans are now willing to accept a tax plan that raises the
federal deficit, a fact that bothers some
deficit hawks.
The result: a need
for greater private - sector financing of
federal deficits.
While Republican leaders and Trump administration officials promised as recently as three weeks ago that the bill would pay
for itself with economic growth, the analyses have been universal: They have shown that the bill would add roughly $ 1 trillion or more to the
federal deficit over 10 years, even when accounting
for the growth.
Q: Will Congress» approval of trillion - dollar
federal budget
deficits this year and next and perhaps into the future be good
for the economy?
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, Treasury Board President Tony Clement and International Trade Minister Ed Fast are expected to retain their portfolios, according to government sources, as the Conservatives work to eliminate the
deficit, re-engineer the public service and conclude major trade agreements in time
for the 2015
federal election.
Under current law, the individual mandate and its associated penalties increase
federal deficits by encouraging people to obtain subsidized coverage — through Medicaid, the health insurance marketplaces established under the ACA, or employment - based plans (which receive indirect subsidies to the extent that premiums
for that coverage are excluded from taxable compensation).
For the government sector, large
federal budget
deficits are a constraint and fiscal policy is slowly shifting from an expansive policy back toward restraint.
By 1997 - 98 the
deficit had been eliminated and the
federal government then ran surplsuses
for the next nine years.
However, a budget
deficit that takes the form of transfer payments to banks, as in the case of the post-September 2008 bank bailout, the
Federal Reserve's $ 2 trillion in cash -
for - trash financial swaps and the $ 700 billion QE2 credit creation by the
Federal Reserve to lend to banks at 0.25 % interest in 2011, has a different effect from
deficits that reflect social spending programs, Social Security and Medicare, public infrastructure investment or the purchase of other goods and services.
The Parliamentary Budget Office has been warning that the
federal government has been running a «structural
deficit»
for several years now, and the Conservative government has been dismissing those warnings
for just as long.
With the onset of the 2008 - 09 recession and the subsequent G20 agreement
for countries to introduce temporary stimulus spending equivalent to 2 percent of GDP, the
federal deficit ballooned to $ 55.6 billion in 2009 - 10; $ 33.0 billion in 2010 - 11; $ 26.3 in 2011 - 12; $ 18.4 billion in 2012 - 13 and $ 5.2 billion in 2013.14.
For the first three months of fiscal year 2011 - 12, the
federal government posted a
deficit of $ 5.5 billion, down $ 1.7 billion from the $ 7.2 billion reported in the same period in 2010 - 11.
For the first eleven months of fiscal year 2017 - 18, the federal government recorded a deficit of $ 5.6 billion, compared to a deficit of $ 11.5 billion for the same period in 2016 - 17 — an improvement of $ 5.9 billi
For the first eleven months of fiscal year 2017 - 18, the
federal government recorded a
deficit of $ 5.6 billion, compared to a
deficit of $ 11.5 billion
for the same period in 2016 - 17 — an improvement of $ 5.9 billi
for the same period in 2016 - 17 — an improvement of $ 5.9 billion.
Finance Minister Joe Oliver's only job strategy is to hope
for a recovery in the U.S. Apparently, he believes there is nothing the
federal government can do to strengthen domestic demand and job creation, except to stick to its plan to eliminate the
deficit by 2015 - 16.
Neither Clinton nor Trump would boost growth or reduce debt and
deficits, according to the Committee
for a Responsible
Federal Budget.
Past achievements include building the case
for deficit reduction in the 1980s and early 1990s,
for consolidation of the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans in the late 1990s, a series of shadow
federal budgets and fiscal accountability reports in that began in the 2000s, and work on marginal effective tax rates on personal incomes and business investment, which has laid the foundation
for such key changes as sales tax reform, elimination of capital taxes, and corporate income tax rate reductions.
In a dress rehearsal
for this November's mid-term election, Democrats and Republicans vied last week
for who could denounce the banks and blame the other party the most
for the giveaways to Wall Street that have swollen the public debt since September 2008, pushing the
federal budget into
deficit and the economy into a slump.
They argue that, since 2009, the
federal government's plans to balance the budget have been based on «risky projections, optimistic forecasts of revenue growth and unrealistic plans
for spending restraint», which have resulted in increases in the projected
deficit with each successive budget, and the pushing out of the date that the
deficit would be eliminated.
They advocate advancing the date
for eliminating the
federal deficit in 2014 - 15.
Democrats Say «Bye» to Populist Option In a dress rehearsal
for this November's mid-term election, Democrats and Republicans vied last week
for who could denounce the banks and blame the other party the most
for the giveaways to Wall Street that have swollen the public debt since September 2008, pushing the
federal budget into
deficit and the economy into a slump.
But according to a recent C.D. Howe study, the
federal government could run a permanent structural
deficit of 1 % of GDP ($ 20 billion) and still maintain a stable debt ratio of 25 %, which happens to be the Conservative government's target
for 2022.
This policy action eliminated a $ 13 billion surplus left by the previous government, created a structural
deficit at the
federal level, and an unsustainable long - term fiscal situation
for the
federal government.
For the eleven - month period ending February 2012, the deficit for the federal government was $ 14.5 billion, down $ 13.8 billion from the deficit of $ 28.3 billion reported in the same period in 2010 -
For the eleven - month period ending February 2012, the
deficit for the federal government was $ 14.5 billion, down $ 13.8 billion from the deficit of $ 28.3 billion reported in the same period in 2010 -
for the
federal government was $ 14.5 billion, down $ 13.8 billion from the
deficit of $ 28.3 billion reported in the same period in 2010 - 11.
For the first four months of fiscal year 2012 - 13 (April to July), the
federal government posted a
deficit of $ 3.0 billion, $ 2.9 billion lower than the $ 5.9 billion reported in the same period in 2011 - 12.
For the first eleven months of fiscal year 2013 - 14, the
federal government posted a
deficit of $ 5.4 billion, an improvement of $ 5.3 billion from the
deficit of $ 10.7 billion reported in the same period in 2012 - 13.
For the first three months of fiscal year 2012 - 13 (April to June), the
federal government posted a
deficit of $ 2.0 billion, less than half of the $ 4.2 billion
deficit reported in the same period in 2011 - 12.
For the first seven months (April to October) of fiscal year 2012 - 13, the
federal government posted a
deficit of $ 10.6 billion, down $ 3.3 billion from the
deficit of $ 13.9 billion reported in the same period in 2011 - 12.
For the period April to March of fiscal year 2012 - 13, the
federal government posted a
deficit of $ 18.3 billion, down $ 3.2 billion from the
deficit of $ 21.6 billion reported in the same period in 2011 - 12.
For the first two months of fiscal year 2013 - 14, the
federal government posted a
deficit of $ 2.7 billion, up $ 0.9 billion from the same period in 2012 - 13.
For the first three months of fiscal year 2014 - 15, which ended March 31, the
federal government posted a surplus of $ 400 million, an improvement of $ 3 billion from the
deficit of $ 2.6 billion recorded in the same period in 2013 - 14.
For the first six months of fiscal year 2013 - 14, the
federal government posted a
deficit of $ 10.7 billion, an increase of $ 1.3 billion from that reported in the same period in 2012 - 13.
For the period April to February of fiscal year 2012 - 13, the
federal government posted a
deficit of $ 11.8 billion, down $ 0.8 billion from the
deficit of $ 12.6 billion reported in the same period in 2011 - 12.
Financial results just released by the Finance department
for the first eight months (April to November) of the 2014 - 15 fiscal year show that the
federal government posted a
deficit of $ 3.3 billion, an improvement of $ 10.1 billion from the
deficit of $ 13.4 billion recorded in the same period in 2013 - 14.
In the 2015 election, Trudeau ran on an economic platform that touted
deficit - financed infrastructure spending and a boost in
federal benefits
for families with kids.
For the first six months of fiscal year 2012 - 13, the
federal government posted a
deficit of $ 8.9 billion, down $ 2.9 billion from the $ 11.8 billion reported in the same period in 2012 - 13.
For the first five months of fiscal year 2011 - 12, the
federal government posted a
deficit of $ 10.7 billion, down $ 2.8 billion from the $ 13.5 billion reported in the same period in 2010 - 11.
For the first seven months (April to October) of the fiscal year 2013 - 14, the
federal government posted a
deficit of $ 13.2 billion, an increase of $ 1.3 billion from that reported in the same period in 2012 - 13.