«Statute of Limitations for Racial Discrimination Claims Extended in
Federal District Court Decision», The Daily Record, April, 2002
The court followed the reasoning of a very similar
federal district court decision.
The 9th Circuit upheld the Hawaii
federal district court decision, focusing primarily on a federal statute that bars discrimination in issuing visas based on national origin or country of residence and also on separation of powers considerations.
His representation has ranged from class action and complex commercial and environmental cases to limited jurisdiction premises liability cases and administrative hearings, successfully arguing appellate cases such as Resolution Trust Corp. v. Rossmoor Corp. (1995) 34 Cal.App.4 th 93, Ryan v. Lustre - Cal (2014) WL 7384613, McCormick v. San Pedro Bait Co., Inc. (2009) WL 4801962 and
the federal district court decision, Ameripride Services, Inc. v. Valley Industrial Service, Inc. (2007 E.D. Cal.)
Last month, we brought you the story about the expert witness who «appealed»
a federal district court decision in which the judge found that his opinion on the plaintiff's «popcorn lung» medical condition was, essentially, hogwash.
In addition,
the Federal District Court decision in the landmark Debra P. vs. Turlington (1981) case directed that students must be provided with ample opportunity to learn the material tested when high stakes, such as high school graduation, are in place.
A three - judge panel in the Court of Appeals overturned
the federal district court decision earlier this month.
And the magnet movement got an early boost from two
federal district court decisions in 1976, in the aftermath of the discord in Charlotte and Boston.
In their latest column on Federal E-Discovery, litigation partners Chris Boehning and Dan Toal discuss two recent
federal district court decisions, including one from the Southern District of New York, that threaten sanctions on...
Not exact matches
«While we had significant victories in the
federal district courts in New York and Boston and the Second Circuit
Court of Appeals, the reversal of the Second Circuit
decision in June by the U.S. Supreme
Court has proven difficult to overcome,» Kanojia conceded in a blog post titled «The «Next Chapter.»
The U.S.
Federal Reserve says it will appeal an earlier
decision from the U.S.
District Court that challenged the swipe - fee regulations set by the central bank.
A
federal district court, Judge Barbara Rothstein presiding, noted a long line of Supreme Court cases protecting «personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education.&r
court, Judge Barbara Rothstein presiding, noted a long line of Supreme
Court cases protecting «personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education.&r
Court cases protecting «personal
decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education.»
The
Federal District Court's
decision favoring doctor - assisted suicide, we said, could be fatal not only to many people who are old, sick, or disabled, but also to popular support for our present system of government.
Like others who support the original understanding of the Constitution, I disagree with many of the Supreme
Court's
decisions under the establishment clause, but in our system of government a
federal -
district judge like Judge Jones is bound by those
decisions.
Jack Martins is considering an appeal to Tuesday's
federal court decision that rejected his bid to move the general election for the 3rd Congressional
District to December.
ALBANY — Republican Jack Martins is considering an appeal to Tuesday's
federal court decision that rejected his bid to move the general election for the 3rd Congressional
District to December.
On February 22, 2014, the U.S.
District Court for Arizona, in a two - to - one
decision, ruled that the state's independent redistricting commission does not violate the
federal constitution.
The reason the issue is on the table is because of a 2012
decision by U.S.
District Court Judge Gary Sharpe requiring the state to set
federal primaries for the fourth Tuesday in June.
If the Supreme
Court wasn't functional for an extended period then various different and contradictory
decisions made by the appeals
courts would build up and there would be different «laws of the land» in each
federal judicial
district.
A
decision made by a judge in a trial in a
federal district court isn't binding on anyone, not even that judge.
Outside of Manhattan's
Federal District Court, site of the three - week trial, Silver's lawyers said they would file motions to challenge the jury's
decision.
Senator representing Ogun East Senatorial
District, Buruji Kashamu, has begged the
Federal High
Court in Abuja to nullify the disciplinary
decisions taken by his party, the Peoples Democratic Party, against him.
On July 2, 2003, a
federal district court judge in Idaho issued his
decision in Natural Resources Defense Council, et.
The
federal district court affirmed the Department of Education's decision, as did the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, applying the Supreme Court's reasoning in the Rowley deci
court affirmed the Department of Education's
decision, as did the 10th Circuit
Court of Appeals, applying the Supreme Court's reasoning in the Rowley deci
Court of Appeals, applying the Supreme
Court's reasoning in the Rowley deci
Court's reasoning in the Rowley
decision.
The
Court's 5 - to - 4 decision in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico affirms an appellate - court decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district court for t
Court's 5 - to - 4
decision in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School
District No. 26 v. Pico affirms an appellate - court decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district court fo
District No. 26 v. Pico affirms an appellate -
court decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district court for t
court decision returning the closely watched censorship case to
federal district court fo
district court for t
court for trial.
A New Jersey judge has ruled that the Woodbury school
district may continue its 22 - year - old policy of starting each school day with a moment of silence «for contemplation» pending a trial on that case and
decisions in two related
federal -
court cases.
In the 1974 Milliken v. Bradley
decision, the Supreme
Court ruled that
courts generally could not require busing across
district lines to achieve racial balance; but the coming months may see more calls from liberals for moving kids across
district lines to fulfill the promise of the
federal law.
At least since the Supreme
Court's Brown v. Board of Education
decision in 1954, this has been interpreted to give the
federal government the power to intervene in cases of legally sanctioned discrimination, like the segregation of public schools across the country; to mandate equal access to education for students with disabilities; and, according to some arguments, to correct for persistently unequal access to resources across states and
districts of different income levels.
The U.S. Supreme
Court last week let stand a lower - court decision finding that Arizona school districts could be sued for damages in federal court, in a case brought by an employee who claimed she was fired for objecting to district requests that she affix a flagpole to her wheelchair to make her more visible to stud
Court last week let stand a lower -
court decision finding that Arizona school districts could be sued for damages in federal court, in a case brought by an employee who claimed she was fired for objecting to district requests that she affix a flagpole to her wheelchair to make her more visible to stud
court decision finding that Arizona school
districts could be sued for damages in
federal court, in a case brought by an employee who claimed she was fired for objecting to district requests that she affix a flagpole to her wheelchair to make her more visible to stud
court, in a case brought by an employee who claimed she was fired for objecting to
district requests that she affix a flagpole to her wheelchair to make her more visible to students.
In a
federal lawsuit filed Nov. 19, the three Brooklyn residents argue that their children's exclusion from the 15 - month course is illegal because of the June
decision by the U.S. Supreme
Court prohibiting
districts from using students» race as a key factor in assigning students to schools.
In 2000, a
federal district judge ruled that Arizona was violating this relatively obscure law, both by not spending enough on its Lau programs — a reference to a Supreme
Court decision of 1974 and regulations of the
federal Office for Civil Rights — and by failing to provide enough teachers, aides, classrooms, materials, and tutoring.
Over time, key
court decisions, as well as later revisions to the
federal law and regulations issued by
federal agencies, have spelled out the rights of students and the obligations of school
districts.
Since the landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme
Court Decision in San Antonio School
District v. Rodriguez, which established that public education is not a right under the
federal Constitution, state
courts have been the battlegrounds for resolving disputes regarding public education finance systems.
In the wake of a hearing last month on this and several related lawsuits, a
Federal District Court judge in Washington, D.C., this week ordered the Interior Department to explain its
decision not to seek the greatest protection.
In a
decision that strikes a blow against the
federal government's controversial practice of excluding industry from consent decrees with environmental citizen groups, a practice known as «sue - and - settle,» the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned the district court's approval of a consent decree between a coalition of environmental groups and several federal agencies in Conservation Northwest v. Sherman, No. 11 - 35729 (9th
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned the
district court's approval of a consent decree between a coalition of environmental groups and several federal agencies in Conservation Northwest v. Sherman, No. 11 - 35729 (9th
court's approval of a consent decree between a coalition of environmental groups and several
federal agencies in Conservation Northwest v. Sherman, No. 11 - 35729 (9th Cir.
This morning, a
federal district court judge overturned the Department of Health and Human Services»
decision to maintain limits on access to Plan B contraception by girls under the age of 17.
The United States
District Court judge, Amy Berman Jackson, said that the E.P.A.'s unilateral
decision in January 2011 to rescind the waste disposal permit for the Spruce No. 1 mine in Logan County, W.Va., exceeded the agency's authority and violated
federal law.
The groups, represented by Western Environmental Law Center and Earthjustice, filed a lawsuit in
federal district court challenging the U.S. Bureau of Land Management's
decision to approve 287 oil and gas leases totaling almost 150,000 acres in south central, north central, and southeastern Montana.
On September 30, 2013, Georgia Aquarium filed a lawsuit in the US
District Court for the Northern
District of Georgia challenging the agency's
decision under the
federal Administrative Procedure Act as contrary to the MMPA and its implementing regulations and as arbitrary and capricious.
A 9th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals decision is pending on whether to uphold U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Vince Chhabria's order sending those suits back to state court from federal c
Court of Appeals
decision is pending on whether to uphold U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Vince Chhabria's order sending those suits back to state court from federal c
Court for the Northern
District of California Judge Vince Chhabria's order sending those suits back to state
court from federal c
court from
federal courtcourt.
Actually, it could be emulated for US Supreme
Court cases but I am waiting to see how the US
District Court cases will be handled, unless someone decides to start scanning in the
Federal Supplement and
Federal Rules
Decisions etc..
He obviously can't hear an appeal of his own
district court decision, but that one has been appealed to the
Federal Circuit anyway.
2016), the
Federal Circuit recently affirmed a
district court's
decision declining to grant attorney's fees because «there was nothing obviously unreasonable» about the losing litigant's position, which the
district court found to be «non-frivolous.»
Posts alert readers about profession - related events and cover state
district attorneys» offices,
federal and state
court decisions, comings and goings at Texas - based law firms and the State Bar of Texas, and profile of Texas lawyers and law students with stories to tell.
A simple search of published
court decisions shows that Wikipedia is frequently cited by judges around the country, involving serious issues and the bizarre — such as a 2005 tax case before the Tennessee Court of Appeals concerning the definition of «beverage» that involved hundreds of thousands of dollars, and, just this week, a case in Federal District Court in Florida that involved the term «booty music» as played during a wet T - shirt con
court decisions shows that Wikipedia is frequently cited by judges around the country, involving serious issues and the bizarre — such as a 2005 tax case before the Tennessee
Court of Appeals concerning the definition of «beverage» that involved hundreds of thousands of dollars, and, just this week, a case in Federal District Court in Florida that involved the term «booty music» as played during a wet T - shirt con
Court of Appeals concerning the definition of «beverage» that involved hundreds of thousands of dollars, and, just this week, a case in
Federal District Court in Florida that involved the term «booty music» as played during a wet T - shirt con
Court in Florida that involved the term «booty music» as played during a wet T - shirt contest.
Facing the question whether the TTAB's earlier
decision on the issue of likelihood of confusion should have been binding on the
district court, the Supreme Court held that decisions by the TTAB may be binding on a federal district court considering the same or similar i
court, the Supreme
Court held that decisions by the TTAB may be binding on a federal district court considering the same or similar i
Court held that
decisions by the TTAB may be binding on a
federal district court considering the same or similar i
court considering the same or similar issue.
But, the
decision leaves Congress with the option of potentially changing that statute which currently limits the personal jurisdiction of
federal trial
courts to that of a state court of general jurisdiction in the same state, as it already does in cases that are predominantly «in rem» (e.g. interpleader cases and interstate boundary and real property title disputes), in bankruptcy cases, and with respect to the subpoena power of U.S. District C
courts to that of a state
court of general jurisdiction in the same state, as it already does in cases that are predominantly «in rem» (e.g. interpleader cases and interstate boundary and real property title disputes), in bankruptcy cases, and with respect to the subpoena power of U.S.
District CourtsCourts.
Received favorable and novel reported
decision from New Jersey
Federal District Court interpreting provisions of a
Federal law offering long term care insurance to employees and retirees, which rejected a retiree's claim that the
Federal law violated disability discrimination laws.
Received favorable
decision from New Jersey
Federal District Court dismissing age and disability discrimination claims of former employees involving comments not previously addressed by the
Federal Courts in the applicable Circuit.
The annual Haynes and Boone Securities Litigation Year in Review comments on significant securities - related
decisions by the Supreme
Court,
federal appellate
courts and
district courts, notes key developments in SEC enforcement, and summarizes significant rulings in state law fiduciary litigation against directors and officers of public companies.