The administration's FY2018 budget went further, targeting reductions in
federal education spending totaling $ 9 billion, which would have amounted to a 13 percent cut in the DOE's $ 68 billion annual budget.
Not exact matches
And at the end of the day, the
federal government accounts for less than ten percent of
total spending on
education, so any changes would be relatively modest.
Its principal task: to distribute
federal funds to states and local school districts amounting to about 8 percent of the
total spent nationally on
education.
During Bush's administration, expenditures from
federal coffers edged upward from 10 percent to 11 percent of
total spending on K — 12
education (with the remainder of the costs shared about equally by state and local governments).
In order to grease the skids and encourage broader support, the bill expanded the
total amount of
federal money
spent on
education, and it created new programs devoted to pet causes of various congressional groups.
The
Federal Government has released its budget for the year ahead, announcing a
total spend in
education of $ 33.7 billion, yet not all areas of
education are set to benefit.
Federal funding constitutes a small but critical portion of
total education spending.
On average, the
federal government contributes about 10 percent to the
total amount
spent on public
education, but these dollars account for a larger portion of many high - poverty districts» budgets.11 For example, Los Angeles Unified School District and Chicago Public Schools — both high - poverty districts — receive about 15 percent of their budgets from the Education Department.12 These dollars serve essential purposes, such as supplementing services for low - income students, defraying the cost of individualized education programs for students with disabilities, and compensating for a loss of property tax due to federally ow
education, but these dollars account for a larger portion of many high - poverty districts» budgets.11 For example, Los Angeles Unified School District and Chicago Public Schools — both high - poverty districts — receive about 15 percent of their budgets from the
Education Department.12 These dollars serve essential purposes, such as supplementing services for low - income students, defraying the cost of individualized education programs for students with disabilities, and compensating for a loss of property tax due to federally ow
Education Department.12 These dollars serve essential purposes, such as supplementing services for low - income students, defraying the cost of individualized
education programs for students with disabilities, and compensating for a loss of property tax due to federally ow
education programs for students with disabilities, and compensating for a loss of property tax due to federally owned land.
Continuing this practice, while also reducing
total ECS
spending (compared to FY 2017 levels) in FYs 2018 and 2019, puts Connecticut at further risk of violating its
federal maintenance of support (MOS) requirement, which is the primary fiscal measure by which states are judged to be eligible for
federal funding under the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA).
As a result, the
federal share has reverted back to around 9 percent of
total spending on public
education.
As a share of
total federal spending,
education spending is very small — comprising just 4 percent of the 2013
federal budget.6 In contrast, as a share of state
spending of state funds (excluding
federal funds), public
education is the largest
spending item in most state budgets and has been for a long time, comprising about one - third of state
spending over most of the past 25 years.
In addition to pressing the
federal government to fully fund its share of the
total cost of special
education, the state should also revise its own complex model of paying for these services, said the task force, offering several suggestions for updating formulas and equalizing
spending across various agencies.