A decade ago, the No Child Left Behind Act ushered in an era of
federal educational accountability marked by relentless focus on closing race - and income - based «achievement gaps» in test scores and graduation rates.
Not exact matches
The move toward federally imposed
accountability standards is necessary to ensure that
federal funds are enhancing
educational opportunity, especially for poor and minority students.
Even as the state - and
federal - led
accountability movement presents new challenges to local control, the political, economic, and
educational arguments for local control are also likely to continue to enjoy support.
Also in this issue: an analysis of open
educational resources and what the
federal role should be in facilitating their adoption; an assessment of Mayor Bill de Blasio's first few years in office in New York City; and an expert debate on the merits of two different approaches to designing state
accountability systems.
Some attribute the comparatively small percentages of students performing at the advanced level to the focus of the 2002
federal accountability statute, No Child Left Behind, on the
educational needs of very low performing students.
Adding to the larger budget, Congress has passed several laws that promote
educational accountability, which tie additional
federal funds to state implementation of these statutory suggestions.
Mr. Taylor has overseen a large team at the California Department of Education of
educational experts who calculated and reported various state and
federal and alternative
accountability systems.
Hence, while it seems that the residual effects of the
federal governments» former efforts are still dominating states» actions with regards to
educational accountability, hopefully some states can at least begin to lead the way to what will likely yield the
educational reform... still desired...
As I wrote into a recent post: ``... it seems that the residual effects of the
federal governments» former [teacher evaluation reform policies and] efforts are still dominating states» actions with regards to
educational accountability.»
These schools also met all state and
federal accountability benchmarks for at least two consecutive years and made significant progress toward goals for increased student achievement and expanded
educational opportunities set by the board.
Sometimes people wonder why I'm so consumed with issues around
educational equity, school choice, standards,
accountability and the need for a strong
federal role in education.
These divisions and schools also met all state and
federal accountability benchmarks and made significant progress toward goals for increased student achievement and expanded
educational opportunities set by the board.
These schools also met all state and
federal accountability benchmarks and made significant progress toward goals for increased student achievement and expanded
educational opportunities set by the board.
The
federal role in education has been critical to safeguarding the civil and
educational rights of English learners, minority students and those with disabilities, and it is important to ensure that gains in
federal law are not lost in state and local
accountability plans.
Prior to joining the SCPCSD, Bobby served as the Title I Team Lead for the Office of
Federal and State Accountability at the South Carolina Department of Education Primary tasks included the allocation of federal allocation, monitoring school districts for compliance of applicable federal and state rules and regulations, approving school district Title I educational program applications, and overall business operations of the p
Federal and State
Accountability at the South Carolina Department of Education Primary tasks included the allocation of
federal allocation, monitoring school districts for compliance of applicable federal and state rules and regulations, approving school district Title I educational program applications, and overall business operations of the p
federal allocation, monitoring school districts for compliance of applicable
federal and state rules and regulations, approving school district Title I educational program applications, and overall business operations of the p
federal and state rules and regulations, approving school district Title I
educational program applications, and overall business operations of the program.
WHEREAS, the over-reliance on high - stakes standardized testing in state and
federal accountability systems is undermining
educational quality and equity in U.S. public schools by hampering educators» efforts to focus on the broad range of learning experiences that promote the innovation, creativity, problem solving, collaboration, communication, critical thinking and deep subject - matter knowledge that will allow students to contribute and thrive in a democracy and an increasingly global society and economy; and
The Republican insistence on transferring
educational oversight from the
federal government to the states fails to recognize, as stated by Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, that «history shows that, without some kind of
accountability, states and districts do not always meet the needs of the most vulnerable students.»
Merrill has extensive experience with charter schools, assessment to improve classroom instruction,
accountability, state and
federal requirements, legislative advocacy on behalf of public education, and molding collaborative and cooperative relationships among
educational communities.
In contrast, the Republic Party platform demands the end of
federal involvement in the American
educational system in favor of «choice - based parent driven
accountability.»
Part One surveyed how the state's skepticism of test - based
accountability starts at the top with Gov. Jerry Brown, who successfully took on the
federal government; Part Two explored how the elimination of certain data systems has limited
educational research...
The Office of
Educational Information Management & Technology Innovations develops and maintains the department's computer applications, administers the department's database, reports
educational information collected by the department, and calculates and reports state and
federal accountability results.
These schools and divisions also have met all state and
federal accountability benchmarks for at least two consecutive years and have made significant progress toward goals for increased student achievement and expanded
educational opportunities set by Governor Kaine and the board.
These schools and divisions also have met all state and
federal accountability benchmarks for at least two consecutive years and have made significant progress toward goals for increased student achievement and expanded
educational opportunities set by the board.
January 10, 2008 — Nineteen school divisions and 478 schools met all state and
federal accountability benchmarks for at least two consecutive years and made significant progress toward Governor Kaine's goals for increased student achievement and expanded
educational opportunity.
He clearly supports shifting
educational accountability to local authorities; for instance, he went on record supporting DeVos and the predicted shift from «
federal interference» in education.
Changes to
federal accountability systems — such as the creation of a risk - sharing system that requires institutions to cover a portion of costs when student loans go bad — may provide new incentives needed to encourage institutions to better focus on preventing the
educational conditions that later lead to default.8