After being heavily lobbied, however, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recognized imported power, including hydroelectricity, as an important way for states to comply with the new
federal emission rules.
Not exact matches
But in a letter to Kerry and other State Department officials, Kristin Delkus, TransCanada's general counsel, pointed to new policies on carbon
emissions in Canada, specifically a
federal rule issued in May to cut
emissions down to 70 percent of their 2005 levels within 15 years.
A group of 17 states plan to file a lawsuit in
federal appeals court challenging the Trump administration's decision to declare vehicle
emissions rules through 2025 «not appropriate.»
Buried deep in
federal regulations to restrict
emissions in the coal - fired electricity sector, officials explain that the costs of those new
rules is about $ 16 billion in today's terms.
Diesel cars from Volkswagen (VLKAF) and Audi, which is owned by VW, were rigged to cheat on clean air
rules with software that made
emissions look cleaner than they actually were, according to
federal and California regulators.
Tough new
federal rules on power plant
emissions would also place significant pressure on coal plants to close.
And tough new
rules from the
federal Environmental Protection Agency on power plant
emissions will make closing Indian Point that much harder, if the state is to do so and still meet its other environmental goals.
California sparked concerns about
emission requirements last year when it sought
federal approval for
rules...
Combination of economic trends and policies Still, for now an array of Obama administration actions and economic trends are conspiring to cut
emissions, according to EIA: Americans are using less oil because of high gasoline prices; carmakers are complying with
federal fuel economy standards; electricity companies are becoming more efficient; state renewable energy
rules are ushering wind and solar energy onto the power grids; gas prices are competitive with coal; and
federal air quality regulations are closing the dirtiest power plants.
That provision led to this year's
federal rule requiring 54.5 mpg by 2025, a tremendous victory that will cut greenhouse gas
emissions from cars and light trucks in half by 2025 and reduce
emissions by 6 billion metric tons.
Another coalition of environmental groups has sued the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to reverse a two - year delay of another methane
rule, this one governing
emissions from drilling on
federal and Indian lands.
Another measure, the
federal Cross-State Air Pollution
Rule, will require still more expensive controls on coal plants in the Midwest and South to reduce sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide
emissions that travel across state lines, creating ozone and fine particle pollution downwind.
A separate EPA
rule finalized last year aims to slash methane
emissions from new facilities and is now under review in
federal court.
The Supreme Court backed a
federal rule that CO2
emissions endanger health, and the White House is having trouble working around it
They have leveled blistering criticism about Obama's efforts to slow down the Keystone Pipeline; they don't like his new auto
emissions standards; they are unhappy with new EPA mercury
emissions rules for boilers; and they don't like the fact that permits for drilling and fracking on
federal lands have slowed.
The previous round of CAFE talks, which dates back to 2007 when the industry dropped its lawsuits against California's proposed
emissions standards and set the table for the combined fuel economy and CO2
federal rules, brought auto makers to the front lines in the war against climate change.
3) As I mention in the blog, every major manufacturer in the world will be making EVs by 2020 because they are being forced to by
Federal and California
emissions rules.
Yesterday, six Senate Republicans joined with most of the Democrats to defeat a bill that would have blocked new
federal rules limiting coal plants» mercury pollution and toxic
emissions.
Upon Mr. Pruitt's confirmation, the Trump administration intends to waste little time issuing directives scaling back high - profile EPA regulations, including a
rule cutting carbon
emissions from power plants and another bringing more bodies of water under
federal jurisdiction, according to several people close to the administration.
This includes announcing a withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement, repealing the Clean Power Plan, rolling back vehicle fuel economy standards, attempting to rescind
rules on methane
emissions from oil and gas production on
federal lands, ending the moratorium on coal leasing on
federal lands, and opening additional offshore areas to oil and gas leasing.
The
federal government has proposed
rules to control
emissions and set a target of achieving a 40 -45-percent reduction below 2005 levels by 2020 — something we can do at bargain prices.
John M. Deutch, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and a former director of central intelligence, said there was little point in criticizing oil companies without first establishing
federal rules that set a price on carbon dioxide
emissions.
A 6 - 2 majority of justices issued a decision upholding
federal agency
rules to control coal - fired power plant
emissions from 28 states.
On Tuesday, a three - judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
ruled that the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, must consider the impact of greenhouse gas
emissions that will result from construction of three new interstate pipelines in the Southeast.
In 2011's AEP vs. Connecticut, the Supreme Court
ruled that individuals may not file nuisance lawsuits regarding carbon
emissions under
federal common law because carbon
emissions are already regulated by the Clean Air Act.
EPA and DOT recently proposed
rules to implement the Obama Administration's May announcement that
federal standards for fuel economy and greenhouse gas
emissions from vehicles would be set to «harmonize» with California's groundbreaking greenhouse gas standards by 2016.
In a January 11, 2011 letter to Chairman Issa, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers reported that «CARB intends to pursue the development of its own separate
rules for MY 2017 - 2025 light duty GHG
emission regulations early this year — more than a year ahead of the
federal rule [emphasis in original].»
According to the 2010 report, «Impact of EPA
Rules on Power Markets,» by Credit Suisse, tougher federal air pollution rules that will be coming in the next few years could prompt electricity companies to close as many as 1 in every 5 coal - burning power plants in America, primarily facilities more than 40 years old that lack emissions cont
Rules on Power Markets,» by Credit Suisse, tougher
federal air pollution
rules that will be coming in the next few years could prompt electricity companies to close as many as 1 in every 5 coal - burning power plants in America, primarily facilities more than 40 years old that lack emissions cont
rules that will be coming in the next few years could prompt electricity companies to close as many as 1 in every 5 coal - burning power plants in America, primarily facilities more than 40 years old that lack
emissions controls.
While the
federal government is taking steps to reduce these
emissions, soon - to - be-proposed
rules from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) don't go far enough.
We already know that coal is being phased out, primarily through market forces, but also through
federal greenhouse gas
emissions limits imposed by President Obama's EPA, for both new power plants (the
rules are already in place) and existing power plants (the
rules are still being negotiated).
In a highly anticipated decision, the German
Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) in Leipzig has
ruled that cities can ban highly polluting diesel cars if necessary to achieve NO2
emission limits.
The
rule represents one of the most significant steps the
federal government has ever taken to curb the nation's greenhouse gas
emissions, which are linked to climate change, and the draft is sure to spark a major political and legal battle.
By getting ahead of potential future
federal rules addressing methane
emissions, states can help companies accelerate the learning curve and reduce future compliance costs.
Under a business - as - usual scenario that includes
rules already passed at the
federal level, HFCs are forecast to contribute 71 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent
emissions annually in the state by 2030.
With a low - end warming comes low - end impacts and an overall lack of urgency for
federal rules and regulations (such as those outlined in the President's Climate Action Plan) to limit carbon dioxide
emissions and limit our energy choices.
With the help of
federal bureaucrats willing to violate the cardinal
rule of bureaucracy — by surrendering regulatory power to the marketplace —
emissions trading would become one of the most spectacular success stories in the history of the green movement.
In his order on Tuesday, Pruitt was expected to declare that the Obama - era
rule exceeded
federal law by setting
emissions standards that power plants could not reasonably meet.
Environment Minister Jim Prentice has been consulting with provinces on the pending
federal regulations, and has encountered resistance from outside Alberta that its industry would either be bound by different
rules than others, or would be allowed to increase
emissions to the detriment of other sectors.
State
rules on greenhouse gas
emissions don't conflict with
federal mileage standards and automakers should be able to develop the technology to meet them, a
federal judge
ruled.
The nation's highest court
ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency held the authority to regulate greenhouse gas
emissions, not
federal judges.
Federal rules building on existing Clean Air Act (CAA) authorities could provide an appropriate framework for reducing upstream methane
emissions.
Earlier this year, President Obama ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to look into possible new regulations for methane
emissions and ordered the Interior Department to ready new
rules for flaring methane from oil and gas production on
federal lands.
The groups are challenging EPA's decision to approve a
federal implementation plan for
emissions of haze - forming pollutants from the Danskammer coal - fired power plant under the Clean Air Act's regional haze
rule.
«Another duplicative
rule at a time when methane
emissions are falling and on top of an onslaught of other new BLM and EPA regulations could drive more energy production off
federal lands.
U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni on July 25 in Manhattan
ruled that
federal law does not preempt the state and its Public Service Commission (PSC) from using a zero -
emissions credit (ZEC) program designed to support cleaner energy options in New York.
A
federal judge in Vermont
ruled in September that the state
rules do not conflict with
federal mileage standards, and a Fresno court in December found that both California and the EPA are empowered to set limits on vehicle
emissions.
Again, these methane
emissions reduction trends can be traced to voluntary efforts — not the stringent and costly «one - size - fits - all»
federal rules that environmental groups insist are needed, despite the fact that they will provide little climate benefit.
«
Ruling on Mercury Emissions Is Appealed»: The Associated Press provides a report that begins, «The Bush administration has appealed a court ruling that the Environmental Protection Agency violated the federal Clean Air Act when it issued less stringent requirements to reduce mercury releases from power p
Ruling on Mercury
Emissions Is Appealed»: The Associated Press provides a report that begins, «The Bush administration has appealed a court
ruling that the Environmental Protection Agency violated the federal Clean Air Act when it issued less stringent requirements to reduce mercury releases from power p
ruling that the Environmental Protection Agency violated the
federal Clean Air Act when it issued less stringent requirements to reduce mercury releases from power plants.