Not exact matches
Whooping cranes are protected by two
federal laws: the
Endangered Species Act and the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act.
Seeking a truce in a battle that has pitted a showy, pointy - tailed
bird against virtually every industry of the western United States,
federal officials today said they would implement a plan to protect the greater sage grouse without listing it as an
endangered species.
In 2015 the agency reversed course without adequate justification or explanation, finding that the
bird «did not warrant»
federal protection, so early the next year the Center and allies sued again for
Endangered Species Act protections for Mono Basin sage grouse.
Additionally, the
Federal Migratory
Bird Treaty and the
Endangered Species Act negatively implicate TVNR and creates the possibilitity of legal action against veterinarians engaging in TVNR.
HAHF argues that «the
Federal Migratory
Bird Treaty and the
Endangered Species Act negatively implicate TVNR and creates the possibilitity [sic] of legal action against veterinarians engaging in TVNR,» and that «the primary veterinarian medical malpractice carrier will not provide insurance coverage for illegal activies [sic].»
Wildlife laws exist at the
federal and state level that are designed to protect species such as migratory
birds, and those listed as
endangered or threatened.
Coastal development has contributed to the
bird's decline, and it's considered threatened by the
federal government and
endangered by the state of New York.
The agency enforces
Federal wildlife laws, administers the
Endangered Species Act, manages migratory
bird populations, restores nationally significant fisheries, conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, and helps foreign and Native American Tribal governments with their conservation efforts.
(Washington, D.C., January 8, 2014) The Ohio National Guard facility at Camp Perry, near Port Clinton in northern Ohio, is the focus of possible legal action by American
Bird Conservancy (ABC), a leading national bird conservation organization, and Ohio's Black Swamp Bird Observatory (BSBO), which today announced the intention to sue the Ohio National Guard in connection with violations of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and other federal laws concerning the planned installation of a wind turbine on the shores of Lake E
Bird Conservancy (ABC), a leading national
bird conservation organization, and Ohio's Black Swamp Bird Observatory (BSBO), which today announced the intention to sue the Ohio National Guard in connection with violations of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and other federal laws concerning the planned installation of a wind turbine on the shores of Lake E
bird conservation organization, and Ohio's Black Swamp
Bird Observatory (BSBO), which today announced the intention to sue the Ohio National Guard in connection with violations of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and other federal laws concerning the planned installation of a wind turbine on the shores of Lake E
Bird Observatory (BSBO), which today announced the intention to sue the Ohio National Guard in connection with violations of the
federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and other
federal laws concerning the planned installation of a wind turbine on the shores of Lake Erie.
They promote spending $ 22 billion just in
federal money during FY - 2014 on climate change studies; costly solar projects of every description; wind turbines that blight scenic vistas and slaughter millions of
birds and bats annually, while wind energy developers are exempted from
endangered species and other environmental laws that apply to all other industries; and ethanol programs that require millions of acres of farmland and vast quantities of water, fertilizer, pesticides and fossil fuel energy to produce a gasoline additive that reduces mileage, harms engines, drives up food prices... and increases CO2 emissions.
Millions of acres were placed off - limits to logging when the
bird was listed as threatened under the
federal endangered - species law.
Other problems with the LBWEG as perceived by HMANA include its failure to require that developers of industrial wind energy projects avoid known
bird migration pathways and daily movement flyways, avoid features of the landscape known to attract raptors (such as ridge lines and coastlines), avoid areas formally designated as Important Bird Areas and avoid documented locations of any species protected under the federal Endangered Species
bird migration pathways and daily movement flyways, avoid features of the landscape known to attract raptors (such as ridge lines and coastlines), avoid areas formally designated as Important
Bird Areas and avoid documented locations of any species protected under the federal Endangered Species
Bird Areas and avoid documented locations of any species protected under the
federal Endangered Species Act.