Sentences with phrase «federal formula grant»

The largest federal formula grant is allocated under Title I of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and flows to districts based primarily on the population of low - income students served.

States, school districts and schools that understand the full potential of federal formula grant programs can leverage significant resources to support their educational goals.

To see funding estimates for your state under Title I, IDEA and other federal formula grants, go to the U. S. Department of Education Budget Tables.

In this way, categorical funding is somewhat analogous to federal formula grants like Title I.

Not exact matches

It also serves as a combined application for federal funds under three (3) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) formula grant programs, including CDBG, HOME, and HESG.

For example, a high - poverty district with lots of Title I - eligible (poor) students weighted heavily in the targeted grants formula would continue to generate disproportionate federal funds for its state's total allocation.

The most appropriate role for the federal government may be to provide resources to states through categorical formula funding or a competitive grant program that would allow policy design to fit the local context rather than try to act as a national school board from Washington, DC.

A natural federal role is to provide resources to support such varied efforts through formula funding or competitive grant programs.

First, because federal and state funds are often distributed through a variety of formula and restricted grant programs, schools are limited in how they can spend certain pots of money.

The report shows how to turn the great majority of federal funding distributed to states and districts — Title I and Title II grants — into investments likely to pay off in educational and economic benefits, by reinventing such formula grants as targeted tools that extend excellent teachers» reach in financially sustainable ways, and more effectively direct funds to the students who need them most.

In addition, under Sections 2102 and 2103 of the Act (Title II, Part A), states may use federal funds provided through formula grants for supporting effective instruction to carry out in - service training for school staff to help them understand when and how to refer students affected by ACEs for appropriate treatment and intervention services.

In turn, the PPSF gives dollars to schools based on a formula that accounts for several factors: PTA funds, local school foundation funds, previous equity grants, federal Title I funds, and student demographics.

From the initiation of federal aid to local school districts in 1965, Democratic administrations had insisted on formula grants, which distributed federal money to schools and districts based on the proportion of students who were poor, not on a competition among states.

The Rural Education Initiative is designed to address the unique needs of small, rural local education agencies (LEAs) that frequently lack the personnel and resources needed to compete effectively for Federal competitive grants and receive formula grant allocations under other programs in amounts too small to be effective in meeting their intended purposes.

I am referring to the proposed radical shift away from formula driven grants — the traditional mechanism for distributing federal education funds — to competitive funding.

Although we appreciate the $ 300 million in new Title I funds to reward successful schools, we are concerned about a significant shift in support toward competitive grant programs and away from the formula programs, notably Title I and IDEA, which provide the vast amount of federal support for K — 12 schools and students.

If the past use of this money is an indicator, however, it is likely that the federal investment in improving teaching under this formula grant will not actually lead to any meaningful change in the quality of instruction in the nation's classrooms.

Distribution: These federal funds are granted to state educational agencies, which then distribute funds to school districts by formula.

The program ended when Congress failed to appropriate funds for its continuation in the 2015 federal spending bill.14 In some sectors, there is increased debate about whether federal funds for education are best allocated through formulas or competitive processes, with opponents of competitive grants citing a desire to reduce federal influence in favor of state and locally - driven education policies.

In addition to formula allocations, at times the federal government makes discretionary awards through competitive grant processes.

Federal funds, which comprise the smallest share of school funding, are delivered almost exclusively through formula grants targeting specific populations of students or particular programs.

That act, adopted in 2010 as part of a state effort to qualify for federal Race to the Top grant funding, established a formula for the state superintendent of public instruction to use in creating a list of 1,000 underachieving schools on what's now called the «open enrollment list,» starting with the lowest - achieving schools on California's Academic Performance Index.

In the round - two scramble for $ 3.4 billion in federal Race to the Top Fund grants, the need for school district and union buy - in — a relatively small, but important part of any winning formula — poses a policy puzzle for the competing states.

Decreases federal support for job training and employment service formula grants for youth and adults;

Several points that I felt were imperative: 1) Everyone at the federal level knows that the current law is disliked and must change, 2) There is a recognized effort to make the language and details of the next ESEA reauthorization more user - friendly — all stakeholders of a school community should be able to understand the legislation and be vested in the success of schools, and 3) Legislators are seeking the right balance between formula funding and competitive grants — one area of consideration is the consolidation of educational programs or initiatives, which will allow federal monies to be used more effectively to help schools and children.

In education, for example, the President's proposed budget eliminates 17 different federal programs that total $ 4.4 billion at the primary and secondary levels, including Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (known as SEED), and 21st Century Community Learning Centers, which are formula grants for out - of - school time programs in high - poverty, low - performing scGrants (known as SEED), and 21st Century Community Learning Centers, which are formula grants for out - of - school time programs in high - poverty, low - performing scgrants for out - of - school time programs in high - poverty, low - performing schools.

Under the FAST Act, rural transit providers are receiving increased federal formula funding under Section 5311, Formula Grants for Rural Areas, and the Tribal Transit Formula, of up to $ 35 million per year, from $ 30 mformula funding under Section 5311, Formula Grants for Rural Areas, and the Tribal Transit Formula, of up to $ 35 million per year, from $ 30 mFormula Grants for Rural Areas, and the Tribal Transit Formula, of up to $ 35 million per year, from $ 30 mFormula, of up to $ 35 million per year, from $ 30 million.

Adams / Central Mixed Use Development, Permanent Public Art Installation, Los Angeles, CA Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX Bibi Space Gallery, Daejon, South Korea Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, CA Harvey Universal Inc., Los Angeles, CA Jarrow Formulas Inc., Los Angeles, CA Luxe Hotel, Los Angeles, CA Museum of Art and History, Permanent collection, Lancaster, CA Tsuge Cafe, Tokyo, Japan United States Federal Courthouse, Los Angeles, CA Wallach Glass Studio, Santa Rosa, CA PRIVATE COLLECTIONS Estate of Betty Asher, donated, Los Angeles County Museum of Art Sam Alexander Carol April Phillip Bialeck Sheila Baird Gerald E. Buck Collection Tony and Cindy Canzoneri Robert and Maureen Carlson Rick Morris and Lisa Cliff Norm DuPont Jeff Ehrlich Merrill Francis Mark Frankel Arnold and Homeira Goldstien Joni Gordon Jonathan and Nancy Glaser David Grant Barbara Horwitz Dr. Todd Hutton Anne Hutton Ken Kaplan Doug Kennedy Marianne Kim, Daejon, Korea Neil and Pamela Kramer Shuji Kato and Kazumi Kua, Tokyo, Japan Jeffrey Kurland Marilyn Lasarow and Judge William Lasarow Dr. Richard Lasarow David Loomstein David Nash Gina Posalski Jarrow Rogovin John and Elsie Sadler Ralph Perl and Rhoda Shapiro Dr. Kumiko Saito, Hayama, Japan Junko Saito, Hayama, Japan Susan Sauvageau George and Kay Sherman Joannie Stern Steve Sztopek Brad and Cynthia Theil Sue Tsao DeWain Valentine

For the first time, there was a federal statute setting forth terms and conditions, with authority to make grants, for provision of civil legal services, including formulas based on population and access.

State aid for early - childhood education, which is part of the statewide funding formula for aid to education, will support the additional expansion of seven classrooms and will continue to support the expanded preschool program when Rhode Island has expended funds from the federal grant.