The only windfall from
federal fossil fuel production is enjoyed by oil, gas, and coal executives.
In particular,
federal fossil fuel production and exploration subsidies in the US have grown in value by 45 percent since President Obama took office in 2009.
The cost of annual
federal fossil fuel production subsidies is equivalent to the projected 2018 budget cuts from Trump's proposals to slash 10 public programs and services that benefit some of the nation's most vulnerable children and families.
Not exact matches
Michael Gerrard, director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia Law School, said he's also expecting to see «a lot more litigation about
fossil fuel extraction, especially on
federal lands and waters,» as the Trump administration seeks to expand domestic energy
production.
«There's no doubt at all that the BLM leases significant areas for the
production of
fossil fuels, and there are certainly greenhouse gases associated with the
production and consumption of those
fuels,» Muller said, adding that
federal government is trying to reduce some of those emissions.
Even after decades of increasingly dire warnings, the US has still not passed comprehensive
federal legislation to combat global warming; Canada has abandoned past pledges in order to exploit its emissions - heavy tar sands; China continues to depend on coal for its energy
production; Indonesia's effort to stem widespread deforestation is facing stiff resistance from industry; Europe is mulling pulling back on its more ambitious cuts if other nations do not join it; northern nations are scrambling to exploit the melting Arctic for untapped oil and gas reserves; and
fossil fuels continue to be subsidized worldwide to the tune of $ 400 billion.
While the majority of Americans want stronger U.S. action on climate change, policies at the state and
federal level continue to underwrite the ongoing exploration and
production of
fossil fuels.
One third of US
fossil -
fuel production is from
federal lands, so remaining
fossil -
fuel production could be reduced substantially simply by letting the current leases run out, without establishing new ones.
This paper examines the implications for U.S.
fossil fuel production and global CO2 emissions of ceasing to issue new
federal leases for
fossil fuel extraction and not renewing existing leases for resources that are not yet producing.
Federal law controls
fossil fuel production, and Congress has encouraged oil and gas development, they said in court documents.
When asked if reducing
fossil fuel production on
federal lands would simply shift
production to private land or foreign sources, Merkley said:
Rather than finding ways to curtail
fossil fuel production in line with the demands of climate science, the U.S.
federal government, under President Obama's «All of the Above» energy strategy, is currently channeling more than $ 5 billion each year in exploration subsidies to actually expand proven reserves, leading to the discovery of
fossil fuels that we know we should never burn.
As a first step, we should dismantle the web of policies that overwhelmingly favors
fossil -
fuel production and use and actively discriminates against new technologies and practices that would reduce harmful emissions... The second step is to institute
federal, state, and local policies that reverse the disincentives created by the existing policy structure and force users to pay the costs of extracting, transporting, and burning
fossil fuels.
«The Energy Policy Act of 2005 similarly speaks directly to the
production of
fossil fuels... («The purpose of this section is to promote natural gas
production from the natural gas hydrate resources on the outer Continental Shelf and
Federal lands in Alaska»); id.
Chevron's filing also cites numerous statutes that refute the plaintiffs» claims that
fossil fuels unreasonably interfere with public rights, including the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1992, the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Mining and Minerals Policy Act, the Coastal Zone Management Act, and the
Federal Lands Policy Management Act, all of which specifically call for the
production of oil and natural gas within the United States:
The
Federal government already hands fossil fuel companies more than $ 7 billion a year in corporate subsidies related to their production on federal lands and
Federal government already hands
fossil fuel companies more than $ 7 billion a year in corporate subsidies related to their
production on
federal lands and
federal lands and waters.
During the budget standoff, he put up a petition to stop
fossil -
fuel production on
federal lands.
If the landfill owners wanted to use the natural gas to generate electricity instead, thereby preventing the methane from entering the atmosphere and displacing the
fossil -
fueled production of electricity, they would have to go through a costly and lengthy process of obtaining permits from regional, state, and
federal officials as well as producing environmental impact reports.