In 2006, the USDA required all school districts receiving
federal funding for school meals to create a wellness policy that addressed food - related policies, nutrition education, and physical activity.
And its conclusions make it all the more dismaying that the pending Child Nutrition Reauthorization in Congress does not include any meaningful raise in
federal funding for school meals.
One important point in the piece:
federal funding for school meals is highly unlikely to increase under Trump — and, indeed, it could well be slashed.
Not exact matches
It is presenting these
meals under the supervision of the National
School Lunch Program, which provides
federal funding in exchange
for meeting certain requirements.
By increasing children's participation in
federal school breakfast and summer
meals programs, the No Kid Hungry North Carolina program could not only offer kids more food but also could garner more
federal funds for the state, according to WRAL.
There is an obvious disparity between the
funds made available by the
federal government to support free
meals for low - income students and the revenue collected by
school districts (from
federal «paid»
meal reimbursements and student payments) to support the very same
meals when served to children at higher income levels.
By placing some parameters on
school food budgets as part of reauthorization legislation, Congress could generate
funds for the
meals programs and ensure that
federal funds are spent on the purposes that it intends.
The loss of
federal funds has stung city
school officials, who started the program with the idea that they would get
federal money to help pay
for the free
meals, which are being served from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at various elementary
schools during the strike.
I get it that JO has brought more attention to the
school food issue, but it is so often the wrong kind of attention, the kind that seeks to blame those lowest on the food chain — the cafeteria ladies, the local
schools, the local nutrition director —
for problems which are coming from the top — the criminally low
Federal funding that forces
schools to rely on cheap processed food; the thicket of government regulation which must be followed no matter how senseless, and hoops which must be jumped through to get the pitifully low reimbursement; the lack of ongoing
Federal funds to pay
for equipment repair or kitchen renovation, forcing
schools to rely on preprocessed food instead of scratch cooking, unless they can pass the hat locally to pay
for a central kitchen to cook fresh
meals.
And I know that
schools have huge incentives
for having more kids on the list to receive the free
meals as that allows them more
federal funding.
The number of students who qualify
for a free or discounted
meal based on income levels also matters because
schools and entire
school systems may qualify
for grants and other
federal funding based on the reported level of need among students.
Nearly all high - poverty
schools that are eligible
for community eligibility also are eligible to receive
federal funding for afterschool
meals.
In the meantime, while the pending child nutrition legislation in Congress seeks to raise
federal reimbursement
for school meals by a mere six cents — rather than the one dollar advocated by reformers like Chef Ann — we need to exploit every opportunity to bring more
funds to
schools.
This
funding can come in the form of a state reimbursement
for free and reduced price
meals paid on top of the
Federal reimbursement;
for example, the state of California is supposed to give
schools an extra.219
for every
meal served to a qualifying low income child (in fact, due to the ongoing budget crisis in California, that reimbursement has not always been paid
for every qualifying
meal in recent years.)
Many public
schools still do not provide free or reduced cost
meals to students eligible to receive them, even though
federal funding is available
for those
meals.
As
school meal participation increases,
school districts draw down the associated additional
federal and state -
funded reimbursements
for meals served.
The Act provides
funding for schools to meet the
federal school nutrition requirements
for school meals.
After months of negotiations, Los Angeles Unified has agreed to repay over $ 55 million
for a series of internal misallocations involving
federal school meal funding.
The Healthy, Hunger - Free Kids Act (HHFKA) provides
funding for six major
federal school meal and child nutrition programs:
HHFKA provides
funding for federal school meal and child nutrition programs.
This effect of including
federal funds reflects the fact that the bulk of
federal education dollars are allocated based largely on the income profile of the communities
schools serve, primarily through
federal subsidies
for free and reduced price
meals and under Title I of the ESEA.19 But because subsidies
for school lunch programs are the largest source of
federal funds flowing to
schools, those concerned with equity must determine how expenditures of those non-instructional
funds are considered.
Federal program
funds are distributed through VDOE to participating
school divisions and residential child care institutions
for meals and snacks served to students.