Sentences with phrase «federal home visiting program»

The federal home visiting program, known as the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting program (MIECHV,) is a cornerstone of evidence - based policy.

House Republicans want to grow the reach of the federal home visiting program — Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV)-- by making states match the money dollar - for - dollar...

It certainly feels like a long time ago that child welfare advocates were brimming with confidence that a bipartisan reauthorization for Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting program (MIECHV)-- the $ 400 million - per - year federal home visiting program that supports programs pairing professionals with young moms — would sail through Congress.

Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation (OPRE) within ACF leads the research and evaluation for the Federal Home Visiting Program, including technical assistance contracts to support data and evaluation activities for tribal and state programs.

House Republicans want to grow the reach of the federal home visiting program — Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV)-- by making states match the money dollar - for - dollar with a combination of state, county and private funds.

Governor Baker and Oregon's Governor Brown sent a letter to Congress at the end of November asking for reauthorization of CHIP, funding for community health centers, and funding for a federal home visiting program.

As opportunities to grow home visiting programs come up, such as the new federal home visiting program, collaborative home visiting state systems provide the infrastructure to support high quality assessment, programming and model fidelity.

Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV) is a Federal Home Visiting Program designed to strengthen programs for families in at - risk communities.

To develop design options for conducting a national evaluation of the new federal home visiting program.

The presentation, «Early Findings from the Federal Home Visiting Program Evaluation: Results from the MIHOPE Report to Congress,» included an overview of the characteristics of families enrolling in MIHOPE programs and summarized the characteristics of local programs in MIHOPE.

They also made visits with U.S. Sens Blunt (R - MO), Roberts (R - KS), McCaskill (D - MO), Murray (D - WA), Cantwell (D - WA) and Rep. Yoder, (R - KS - 3) to talk about the reauthorization of the federal home visiting program, MIECHV.

In this role, Dr. Fountain Hanna oversees the first national home visiting Collaborative Improvement and Innovation Network (CoIIN) as well as awardee implementation of elevated standards for quality improvement in the Federal Home Visiting Program.

Much of her current work is related to the Federal Home Visiting Program.

In discussion of these projects, panelists will highlight process lessons learned, key partners, goals for building knowledge and aims for supporting the evolution of the federal home visiting program.

The federal home visiting program panel will describe recent projects to advance the program and build knowledge in the field, including:

The federal home visiting program currently provides grants to 47 states, the District of Columbia, five territories and three nonprofit organizations, including the Florida Association of Healthy Start Coalitions which administers MIECHV for the state of Florida.

The HV CoIIN aims to improve services provided by home visiting grantees to achieve better, faster results for low - income and other at - risk families served under the Federal Home Visiting Program

This time - limited learning activity targets for improvement four major areas of concern to the federal home visiting program, breast feeding, maternal well - being, child development and family engagement.

Launched in September 2013, through a three - year cooperative agreement with Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC), the Home Visiting CoIIN works to achieve breakthrough improvements in select process and outcome measures, including benchmark areas legislatively mandated for the Federal Home Visiting program, while reducing or maintaining program costs.

The program supports Federal Home Visiting Program grantees in the development, implementation, and evaluation of innovations to strengthen and improve delivery of coordinated and comprehensive high - quality voluntary services to eligible families.

«Today's legislation will ensure that funding for voluntary federal home visiting programs, currently set to expire at the end of September, will continue through March 2015.

Not exact matches

Evidence - Based Model Crosswalk to Benchmarks: Model Alignment With Benchmark (PDF - 641 KB) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services & Health Resources and Services Administration (2011) Describes the Affordable Care Act Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV), and how the act responds, through evidence - based home visiting programs, to diverse needs of children and families in at - risk communities through collaboration at the Federal, State, and community levHome Visiting Program (MIECHV), and how the act responds, through evidence - based home visiting programs, to diverse needs of children and families in at - risk communities through collaboration at the Federal, State, and communityVisiting Program (MIECHV), and how the act responds, through evidence - based home visiting programs, to diverse needs of children and families in at - risk communities through collaboration at the Federal, State, and community levhome visiting programs, to diverse needs of children and families in at - risk communities through collaboration at the Federal, State, and communityvisiting programs, to diverse needs of children and families in at - risk communities through collaboration at the Federal, State, and community levels.

Some of the recently developed home visiting programs have proliferated, encouraged by federal, state / provincial, local, and private support.

Federal and state policymakers should ensure that adequate funding is available to integrate health screenings and services into other programs reaching infants and toddlers, including child care settings, nutrition services, home visiting programs, and foster care homes.

The Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) Program provides federal funds for states and Tribal entities to support voluntary, evidence - based home visiting services during pregnancy and to parents with young children up to 5 years Home Visiting (MIECHV) Program provides federal funds for states and Tribal entities to support voluntary, evidence - based home visiting services during pregnancy and to parents with young children up to 5 yeVisiting (MIECHV) Program provides federal funds for states and Tribal entities to support voluntary, evidence - based home visiting services during pregnancy and to parents with young children up to 5 years home visiting services during pregnancy and to parents with young children up to 5 yevisiting services during pregnancy and to parents with young children up to 5 years old.

Eight existing home visiting programs met the minimal legislative threshold for federal funding: Early Head Start, the Early Intervention Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low rathome visiting programs met the minimal legislative threshold for federal funding: Early Head Start, the Early Intervention Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low ratHome Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low rating.

MIECHV is the federal program that supports states in implementing evidence - based home visiting programs for at - risk families.

Another option is for SEOG and the other campus - based aid programs (federal work study and Perkins loans) to be recast as an emergency aid program that colleges could use to help students with unexpected expenses such as an extra trip home to visit a sick relative, or for «completion grants» to students facing relatively small financial barriers to finish their degrees.

To participate in the home visit project, a school must be eligible under the federal Title I grant — provided to support large populations of disadvantaged students — and at least half of its teaching staff must indicate at least an interest in learning more about the program for the school to be selected, Levasseur said.

PUBLIC / CORPORATE COLLECTIONS Planet Fitness Achenbach Collection, Fine Art Museums of San Francisco, CA Rosewood Sand Hill, Palo Alto, CA Brooklyn Union Gas, Brooklyn, NY Chatham Imports, New York Champion International, New York Cleary Gottlieb, New York Cowan, Liebowitz & Lachman, New York Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Washington, DC Fogg Art Museum, Cambridge, MA Richard L. Nelson Gallery & The Fine Arts Collection Rosenthal & Rosenthal, New York Milbank, Tweed, Hadley and McCloy, New York Prudential Insurance Company Newark, New Jersey Bingham, Dana & Gould, Attorneys, Boston, Massachusetts Lee & Silva Terry, The Metro Companies, Atlanta, Georgia Long Island University, C.W. Post Campus, Brookville, New York Wynn Kramarsky, New York UCLA Hammer Museum, Los Angeles Crocker Art Museum, Sacramento, CA Jones Day, Ohio The Mansion at Turtle Creek, Texas Rosewood Sand Hill Project, Palo Alto, CA Achenbach Foundation for Graphic Arts at the California Palace of the Legion of Honor, San Francisco, CA VISITING ARTIST Brandeis University, Waltham, MA Union College, Schenectady, NY Maryland Institute College of Art - Sculpture Program, Baltimore, MD Maryland Institute College of Art - Mount Royal Graduate Program, Baltimore, MD Amherst College, Amherst, MA Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA Middlebury College, Middlebury, CT Parsons School of Design, New York Empire State College, New York State University of Arkansas, Jonesboro, AK Brooklyn College, NY Rhode Island School of Design, Providence, RI School of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, MA Bennington College, Bennington, VT California State University, Sacramento and Stanislaus, CA University of Iowa, Iowa City, IO Anderson Ranch, Snowmass, CO Pont - Aven School of Art, France Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA Kansas City Art Institute, Kansas City, MO Purdue University, Indiana Virginia Commonwealth University University of California, Riverside Lafayette College, Easton, PA University of Oregon - Eugene, Eugene, Oregon Haverford College, Haveford, PA Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA

ASTHVI membership is open to state and tribal officials administering federal or state - funded home visiting programs.

The Maternal, Infant, Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program is the main source of federal funding for home visitHome Visiting (MIECHV) program is the main source of federal funding for home vVisiting (MIECHV) program is the main source of federal funding for home visithome visitingvisiting.

The main source of federal funding for home visiting — the Maternal, Infant, Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program — is scheduled to expire in September 2017, unless the U.S. Congress takes action to reauthorizehome visiting — the Maternal, Infant, Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program — is scheduled to expire in September 2017, unless the U.S. Congress takes action to reauthovisiting — the Maternal, Infant, Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program — is scheduled to expire in September 2017, unless the U.S. Congress takes action to reauthorizeHome Visiting (MIECHV) program — is scheduled to expire in September 2017, unless the U.S. Congress takes action to reauthoVisiting (MIECHV) program — is scheduled to expire in September 2017, unless the U.S. Congress takes action to reauthorize it.

Pre-term birth to mothers enrolled during pregnancy is one of the new federal performance measures that will be reported annually for MIECHV - funded home visiting programs.

The Maternal, Infant, Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program is the main source of federal funding for home visiting in IllinHome Visiting (MIECHV) program is the main source of federal funding for home visiting in IVisiting (MIECHV) program is the main source of federal funding for home visiting in Illinhome visiting in Ivisiting in Illinois.

The federal Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program helps fund these services in all 50 states.

Given the high level of federal and state investment in evidence - based home visiting programs, identifying the extent to which home visiting programs provide value for families and children, even if the families do not complete the program, is important for demonstrating home visiting as a sound investment.

If the federal Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program was reauthorized with increased funding, states would serve significantly more families, build infrastructure, create jobs, and generally strengthen services in their states and communities, according to a new survey by the National Home Visiting Resource Center (NHVRC).

The federal Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program, which supports the implementation of Healthy Families Florida, Nurse - Family Partnership and Parents as Teachers in 21 high - need communities, accounted for 1,500 of the families served and 15,500 of the home visits provided in the state during this perHome Visiting (MIECHV) program, which supports the implementation of Healthy Families Florida, Nurse - Family Partnership and Parents as Teachers in 21 high - need communities, accounted for 1,500 of the families served and 15,500 of the home visits provided in the state during this perhome visits provided in the state during this period.

The National Home Visiting Coalition is calling for a Day of Action on Tuesday, September 19 to urge federal lawmakers to reauthorize the Maternal, Infant & Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program before it expires at the end of the month.

Colorado relies on federal funding to support four evidence - based home visiting programs across the state.

However, existing federal and state performance measures do not measure all of the ways participation in home visiting programs is related to positive outcomes for children and families.

It provides support for federal, state, and community governments to implement established and proven home visiting programs for at - risk children.

Importantly, states were required to spend at least three - quarters of the federal funds on home visiting models that met federal standards of evidence - based effectiveness.1 As many policy scholars have noted, that a national initiative brought the importance of evidence - based practice to the forefront of public policy is a triumph for social science and demonstrates the importance of rigorous program evaluation.2 With that triumph, however, comes a responsibility to ensure that the public's expectations for success of these programs are consistent with what researchers understand about the empirical evidence — will the same positive outcomes found in programs» randomized controlled trials emerge when those programs are taken to scale?

The purpose of this paper is to review the evidence base for three widely - used home visiting programs that have met the federal criteria for evidence - based to highlight the limits to both the internal and external validity of the evidence and to provide a case study as a point of comparison using data from a large, statewide implementation effort.

Texas is also the recipient of federal funding through Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV), which supports the Texas Home Visiting Program (THV).

However, existing performance measures do not measure all of the ways participation in home visiting programs is related to positive outcomes for children and families.Given the high level of investment at the federal and state level into evidence - based home visiting programs, identifying the extent to which home visiting programs provide value for families and children even if they do not complete the program is important for demonstrating home visiting as a sound investment.

The Secretary's Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality (SACIM) issues recommendations and a framework for a national strategy to reduce infant mortality and reaffirms need for continued federal investment in Medicaid; Title Vl MCH Services Block Grant; Healthy Start; Title X Family Planning Program; Community Health Centers; Maternal, Infant, Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) Program, and WIC.

As part of the federal Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV), Family Connects is now being implemented across the country including several new communities in Texas.

Eight existing home visiting programs met the minimal legislative threshold for federal funding: Early Head Start, the Early Intervention Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low rathome visiting programs met the minimal legislative threshold for federal funding: Early Head Start, the Early Intervention Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low ratHome Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low rating.