Sentences with phrase «federal judicial branch»

Suppose there is open conflict between an executive administration and the federal judicial branch.

A pretty large volume of the entire U.S. Court of Appeals docket involves sentencing decisions where guilt is not disputed, and surely panel sentencing in cases with potentially long sentences would reduce that and might even be money saving for the federal judicial branch as a whole despite the extra effort invested at the trial court level, in addition to furthering justice by balancing out extreme stances.

Not exact matches

If the branches of the federal government are truly coequal, if the President and Congress are not subordinated to the Court by the Constitution (except insofar as the Court might declare them to be), then the theme of «judicial restraint» that runs wistfully through your symposium is less an appeal for the impossible than a misconstrual of the problem.

What we object to is, first, the judicial manufacture of constitutional law to displace without constitutional warrant the duly enacted judgments of the people and their elected representatives, and, second, the idea of judicial supremacy that treats the executive and legislative branches of the federal government as impotent to do anything but bow down before unconstitutional exercises of judicial power, however blatant and destructive of the constitutional order.

In November 2013, Senate Democrats used the nuclear option to eliminate filibusters on executive branch nominations and federal judicial appointments other than those to the Supreme Court.

The answer is that since November 2013 a simple majority has sufficed because of the Senate's decision to end the use of the filibuster in respect of all nominees to Federal judicial and executive branch positions other than to the Supreme Court itself.

This vesting clause, along with the Executive and Judicial Branches deliniates a clear separation of powers in the federal government.

Judicial review is the power of the Court to examine federal legislation, federal executive, and all state branches of government, to decide their constitutionality, and to strike them down if found unconstitutional.

Fellows in the judicial branch are found at the Federal Judicialjudicial branch are found at the Federal JudicialJudicial Center.

Fellows serve yearlong assignments in the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the federal government in Washington.

Join us on October 8 at 2:00 EST for a one - hour live chat session where you'll learn how fellows impact science policy initiatives on Capitol Hill, in federal agencies, and the judicial branch — and how you can apply your science and engineering background to transform your career.The entire hour will be devoted to answering your questions.

Join us on August 20 at 2:00 p.m. ET for a one - hour live chat session where you'll learn how fellows impact policy initiatives on Capitol Hill, in federal agencies, and the judicial branch — and how you can apply your social science background to transform your career.

Shubha Ghosh, was the 2014 - 15 Judicial Branch Fellow at the Federal Judicial Center (FJC).

THE US Congress, according to the Constitution we hold sacred over here, is one of three branches of the federal government (the other two being the executive and judicial branches).

With yearlong placements in Washington, DC in the executive, judicial, and legislative branches of federal government, the Science & Technology Policy Fellowships fosters a network of STEM leaders who understand government and policymaking, and are prepared to develop and execute solutions to address today's pressing challenges.

Syl Sobel, an attorney and a former newspaper reporter, is currently the director of communications for the Federal Judicial Center — the agency responsible for education, training, and policy research for the judicial branch of the U.S. govJudicial Center — the agency responsible for education, training, and policy research for the judicial branch of the U.S. govjudicial branch of the U.S. government.

The Judicial Branch consists of the U.S. court system, the Supreme Court and other federal courts.

My embarrassment crested yesterday when I actually read some of the endless stream of two - dimensional media polls asking people to weigh in on what various members of Terri Schiavo's family should do — as well as what the medical profession, Congress, and the executive and judicial branches of federal government should do.

My reply was: «You're a federal judge with lifetime tenure telling me, an executive branch creature, that I tout «judicial independence» so that I can do what I want.»

Todd & Weld filed suit on behalf of Judge Kendall in federal court challenging the removal proceedings as unconstitutional on separation of powers grounds as an illegal encroachment by the legislative and executive branches of government on the inherent right of the judicial branch of government to monitor and review judicial conduct.

The court system of Canada forms the judicial branch of the federal, provincial and territorial governments and is independent of the legislative and executive branches of government.

The executive branch in each Canadian jurisdiction (provinces, territories, federal) is free to enact its own copyright and licensing policy in relation to the work product of its public servants, and so does in a variety of ways, some more permissive than others (see Noel Cox, «Copyright in Statutes, Regulations, and Judicial Decisions in Common Law Jurisdictions: Public Ownership or Commercial Enterprise?»

The federal government, made up of three branches: the legislative, executive and judicial, runs on a system of checks and balances.

Paul has over 25 years of experience in all aspects of court technology development from programming, project management and coordinating data exchanges with other branches of the federal government to supporting improved judicial business processes.

In the United States the Judicial branch or the Supreme Court interprets and applies laws, while federal courts manage cases involving federal law.

In a society where only 26 percent of adults can name all three branches of the federal government and a third can not even name one, Colorado's judicial branch has sought to improve its citizens» civics knowledge through Our Courts Colorado.

«But even if that possibility, or some would argue that probability, will occur, that's why we have the judicial branch [of the federal government],» he says.

The judicial tribunals on which this book focuses are the same executive branch organizations that, as noted above, were called «judicial tribunals» in the McRuer Report; the same organizations that, in 1990, Ed Ratushny's Report on the Independence of Federal Administrative Tribunals and Agencies described as «tribunals which are adjudicative» and for which it recommended the label «tribunal» be exclusively reserved; and the same organizations that in 1991 the late Chief Justice of Canada Antonio Lamer, in a keynote speech to the conference of the Council of Canadian Administrative Tribunals, referred to as bodies that are «created to operate essentially as adjudicators... in a manner that is similar to the function of the judiciary... [and] expected to dispense justice in the same sense as the courts of law.»

As another example, federal law requires the judicial branch to keep and publish statistics regarding a variety of matters related to its business in an annual or periodic report, but does not specify every fine detail of how this must be done or what must be included in these reports, and this makes it necessary, in practice, for federal courts to require «cover sheets» classifying all new cases filed in federal court of all litigants commencing new cases.

Federal government jobs are available in the legislative, judicial and executive branches of government in all 50 states, in the U.S. territories and beyond.