Sentences with phrase «federal land cases»

Trump has also not tipped the balance in the 10th Circuit, where federal land cases might be heard, and which includes Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Kansas and Oklahoma.

Not exact matches

That article landed Manafort in hot water with prosecutors and the judge presiding over the federal criminal case against him.

The state would drop that lawsuit as part of the settlement agreement with the Oneidas, and that dismissal would require the approval of the federal judge in the trust land case.

The federal government also opposes allowing the Cayugas in the Oneida land case.

Previous Spring Valley Mayor Noramie Jasmin remains in jail on federal corruption charges stemming from the «Corridor of Corruption» case that also landed Malcolm Smith, Jay Halloran and other major figures in prison.

«On the other hand, the Chief of Army Staff (COAS) is responsible for all land operations and will continue to exercise that role and as may be directed by the President, Commander - in - Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria through the Minister of Defence, the CDS or directly to the COAS as the case may be.

As such, any cases that are brought to Federal Judiciary will be tried by lower Federal judges (circuit courts I assume) and then the circuit court decision on the case will be the law of the land until (at some point in indeterminate future) SCOTUS is re-constituted and overturns one of those decisions.

The case arose as an outgrowth of the Northwest Forest Plan, a 1994 deal that allows logging on federal lands but reduces some of the industry's destructive practices.

The case stems from two 2004 federal lawsuits brought by seven states and several land - trust groups alleging that emissions from five major power companies could cause harm by contributing to global warming.

According to legal observers, the outcome of the case, Lawrence County v. Lead - Deadwood School District No. 40 - 1 (Case No. 83 - 240), could affect school finances in many Western states, where millions of acres of land are owned by the federal government and thus are not subject to property taxes, a major source of school revecase, Lawrence County v. Lead - Deadwood School District No. 40 - 1 (Case No. 83 - 240), could affect school finances in many Western states, where millions of acres of land are owned by the federal government and thus are not subject to property taxes, a major source of school reveCase No. 83 - 240), could affect school finances in many Western states, where millions of acres of land are owned by the federal government and thus are not subject to property taxes, a major source of school revenue.

The federal government, which is administered by several agencies that include the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Reclamation, the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, the U.S. National Park Service, the Utah State Department of Wildlife Resources, the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and in some cases the Utah State Department of State Parks, owns approximately 64 percent of the state of Utah The Bureau of Land Management manages approximately 36 percent of the land, making it the largest single landowner in the stLand Management, the Bureau of Reclamation, the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, the U.S. National Park Service, the Utah State Department of Wildlife Resources, the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and in some cases the Utah State Department of State Parks, owns approximately 64 percent of the state of Utah The Bureau of Land Management manages approximately 36 percent of the land, making it the largest single landowner in the stLand Management manages approximately 36 percent of the land, making it the largest single landowner in the stland, making it the largest single landowner in the state.

Some federal cases are of the less serious variety, due to jurisdictional issues — such as Native - American Nation Indian Reservations or federal lands.

LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc., representing Fidelity National Financial, Inc. in its contested acquisition of Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company and Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, which required approval of the Bankruptcy Court administering the parent holding company, the Nebraska state court administering the rehabilitation cases of the target companies, three state insurance commissioners and the Federal Trade Commission.

Michael Muse - Fisher represents public and private companies in a variety of state, federal and administrative cases involving contract disputes, commercial litigation, licensing and intellectual property matters, eminent domain / inverse condemnation, government tort liability, breach of fiduciary duty, as well as land - related torts.

By applying our in - depth knowledge of the Jones Act, the OCS Lands Act, the Longshore Act and other federal regulations, we will secure the best possible outcome in your case and help fight for fair compensation for your injuries, including:

* Canadian Criminal Cases — 1898 to present * Dominion Law Reports — 1912 to present * Labour Arbitration Cases — 1948 to present * Land Compensation Reports — 1971 to present * Ontario Municipal Board Reports — 1972 to present * Alberta Decisions, Civil Cases — 1979 to 2007 * Alberta Decisions, Criminal Cases — 1979 to 2007 * All - Canada Weekly Summaries — 1977 to present * British Columbia Decisions, Civil Cases — 1977 to present * British Columbia Decisions, Criminal Cases — 1977 to 2007 * British Columbia Labour Arbitration Decisions — 1982 to present * British Columbia Labour Relations Board Decisions — 1979 to present * Canadian Labour Arbitration Summaries — 1986 to present * Charter of Rights Decisions * — 1961 to 2007 (* includes Bill of Rights) * Federal Court of Appeal Decisions — 1980 to 1999 * Manitoba Decisions, Civil Cases — 1978 to 1999 * Manitoba Decisions, Criminal Cases — 1978 to 1999 * Saskatchewan Decisions, Civil Cases — 1980 to 2007 * Saskatchewan Decisions, Criminal Cases — 1980 to 2007 * Supreme Court of Canada Decisions — 1978 to present * Weekly Criminal Bulletin — 1977 to present

Some federal cases are of the less serious variety, due to jurisdictional quirks — such as Indian Reservations or federal lands.

• The opportunity to land a contract for federal public prosecutors; these tend to be geographically limited to where there are no federal Crown regional offices, or where it is otherwise not cost - effective for staff counsel to handle cases.

We also handle regulatory taking, eminent domain, and condemnation cases and represent clients in litigation under specialized federal statutes, such as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act and the Fair Housing Act.

Our real estate, land use, and environmental law litigators have won a number of landmark real estate cases in the state and federal courts.

In that case, McCaleb v Rose, the appellant argued that provincial enactments could no longer be excluded on the basis of federal jurisdiction over «lands reserved for Indians» following Tsilhqot» in.

The case presents a number of intriguing issues, among them the meaning of Article X, section 4 of the California Constitution and its application, if any, to lands for which title is derived from a provisional Mexican land grant confirmed by a federal patent issued in the 19th century.

Administrative law — Judicial review — Municipal law — Taxation — Real property tax — Payments made by Federal Crown in lieu of real property tax — Assessed value of Halifax Citadel — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister is unconstrained by the assessed value of the property determined by the assessment authority in determining the property value of a federal property for purposes of the PILT Act — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination of the Dispute Advisory Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu of taxes, representing 47 of 49 acres of the site, at $ 10 — Whether the Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective of assessed value — Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. Federal Crown in lieu of real property tax — Assessed value of Halifax Citadel — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister is unconstrained by the assessed value of the property determined by the assessment authority in determining the property value of a federal property for purposes of the PILT Act — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination of the Dispute Advisory Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu of taxes, representing 47 of 49 acres of the site, at $ 10 — Whether the Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective of assessed value — Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister is unconstrained by the assessed value of the property determined by the assessment authority in determining the property value of a federal property for purposes of the PILT Act — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination of the Dispute Advisory Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu of taxes, representing 47 of 49 acres of the site, at $ 10 — Whether the Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective of assessed value — Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. federal property for purposes of the PILT Act — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination of the Dispute Advisory Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu of taxes, representing 47 of 49 acres of the site, at $ 10 — Whether the Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective of assessed value — Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination of the Dispute Advisory Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu of taxes, representing 47 of 49 acres of the site, at $ 10 — Whether the Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective of assessed value — Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. M - 13.

Known as the Keewatin case, in Grassy Narrows First Nation v. Ontario (Natural Resources) the Supreme Court agreed with the lower court that Ontario did not need to consult with the federal government before taking up land in a tract included in Treaty 3 of 1873.

In his scathing critique of the DAICO, Preston Byrne writes: «I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here, because the SEC literally wrote a report about the original DAO scheme, likened it to a security, and cited as authority for this proposition not one but TWO cases relating to an infamous 1970s pyramid scheme that landed its promoter in federal prison for nearly a decade.»

The Full Federal Court found that the first judge had made a number of errors in his decision and have sent the case back for consideration by a new judge, leaving the Noongar peoples uncertain about the future of their rights over the land.

For the past year, between the Full Federal Court and the High Court decisions, the Northern Land Council, which represents the Traditional Owners in the case, has been issuing free permits to commercial fishermen to use the inter-tidal zone.

This requires that the notice specifying the land specify that a right, title or interest in the land is preserved, in which case it does not vest in the federal government.

-- any purpose (in the case of land subject to CLA lease), the federal minister thinks fit, including a number of specified purposes.80

In the upcoming Supreme Court case, the justices will look at whether landowners can sue the federal government if they believe their land is NOT covered under the law.

Bachelor Degree 1979, REOS Specialist, SFR Short Sales and Foreclosure Resource, Environmental Concerns Affecting Real Estate Transaction, Essentials of International Real Estate, Europe and International Real Estate, Asia / Pacific International Real Estate, The Americas International Real Estate, Investment and Financial Analysis of International Real Estate, Standards of Practice, Essential Real Estate Techniques, Real Estate Specialties, Case Studies in Acquisition Analysis, Commercial Contracts, Commercial Real Estate Investment and Development Analysis Course, Code of Ethics, Core Law, Accredited Buyers Representative, Appraising, Contracts, Real Estate Law Contracts, Law of Agency, Real Estate Finance, Real Estate Marketing, Real Estate Investments, Commercial Property Management, Sales Comparison, Cost Depreciation, and Income Approaches, Federal Income Tax Laws Affecting Real Estate, Zoning and Planning Subdividing of Land and Special Issues, Selling Skills and Management (Xerox), working on CCIM and on going Continuing Education.

You should consider structuring the disposition (sale) of your aircraft, aviation equipment or landing rights as a 1031 Exchange by exchanging qualified use aircraft, aviation equipment or landing rights («relinquished property») for other qualified use aircraft, aviation equipment or landing rights («replacement property») in order to defer your federal, and in most cases, state capital gain income tax liabilities.