Jack engineered a successful summary judgment in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida for a large Washington, DC communications law firm in a $ 100 million
federal legal malpractice claim involving Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations.
Not exact matches
[2] Prior to Gunn, state and
federal courts applying this test frequently applied
federal jurisdiction over state - law
claims with embedded patent issues, including breach of contract
claims involving patent licenses, defamation, and
legal malpractice claims.
Minton asserted a
legal malpractice claim in Texas state court after a
federal court ruled that his patent was invalid due to a statutory bar, alleging that his attorney, Gunn, failed to timely raise the experimental use exception.
In this groundbreaking case, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that the trial court correctly dismissed a
legal malpractice suit against the attorney and his law firm because the underlying product liability
claim plaintiffs» asserted should have been pursued was statutorily preempted under the
federal Medical Device Act («MDA»).
Lipson Neilson Enjoys Hard Fought Victory:
Federal Court Dismisses Multi-Million Dollar Trade Secret
Claim Against Altair Engineering, Inc. and Key Employee
Legal Malpractice Summary Dismissal Victory by Phillip E. Seltzer and Samantha Heraud
Represented a law firm in state and
federal court proceedings against litigation trust, multiple plaintiff groups, and an investor class bringing
claims for securities fraud and
legal malpractice