The National School Lunch program exists to serve low - income children (those receiving
federal meal subsidies), and among that group, participation has actually increased.
Another way to assess whether the price charged for a paid meal is sufficient is to compare it (after adding
the federal meal subsidy) to the federal reimbursement for free meals.
SFAs would be well served by setting paid meal prices at a level that, when combined with
the federal meal subsidy, at least covers the cost of producing the meal.
Not exact matches
Prices for paid
meals should be brought to levels that, when combined with the
federal subsidy, actually cover the cost of providing those
meals.
Students who do not qualify for free or reduced price
meals because their family income exceeds 185 percent of the poverty line may purchase «paid»
meals, which receive a modest
federal subsidy that supplements the price their parents pay for such
meals (see Table 1).
It could do so by requiring school districts that charge lower prices to increase prices gradually so that, when combined with the
federal subsidy provided for such
meals, they eventually at least equal the
federal reimbursement level for free
meals.
If the price charged for paid
meals, combined with the
federal per -
meal subsidy, covered the costs of these
meals (or equaled the
federal per -
meal reimbursement for free
meals), more funds could be put toward providing more nutritious
meals, providing better compensation and professional support to food service staff, or other improvements that would benefit children.
To the
federal subsidies already in place, it added 10 cents for every breakfast, 10 cents for every lunch and a five - cent bonus for every lunch
meal that contains a locally - grown component.
What is the city of Houston doing to support school
meals, other than relying on the
federal subsidy?
Especially in districts with large numbers of needy students,
federal subsidy dollars can more than pay for breakfast, meaning extra cash to help support the entire
meal program.
This effect of including
federal funds reflects the fact that the bulk of
federal education dollars are allocated based largely on the income profile of the communities schools serve, primarily through
federal subsidies for free and reduced price
meals and under Title I of the ESEA.19 But because
subsidies for school lunch programs are the largest source of
federal funds flowing to schools, those concerned with equity must determine how expenditures of those non-instructional funds are considered.