Sentences with phrase «federal poverty limits»

Cost - sharing - reduction payments are made to insurers to offset some of their costs for providing discount insurance plans to Americans who earn up to 200 % of the federal poverty limit.

Families earning up to 130 percent of the federal poverty limit ($ 29,055 for a family of four) would get the full amount of state aid per child.

Previously, Senate Republicans had opposed a push to increase the income limits to 300 percent of the federal poverty limit — which would match the limits for families in the separate Milwaukee and Racine voucher programs.

Also known as exchanges, these marketplaces are intended to be a portal to affordable health insurance for families earning between 100 - 400 percent of the federal poverty limit.

While the ACA has helped numerous families with lower incomes and pre-existing conditions, it has created some adverse effects for individuals who earn more than 400 percent of the Federal Poverty Limit (FPL)-- where the subsidies drop off — and those who live in certain states.

Not exact matches

In Alabama, a family must have income less than 18 percent of the Federal Poverty Guideline ($ 3,562 for a family of three in 2014) for the parent to receive Medicaid coverage, while the limit in Alaska is 134 percent of the FPG, or $ 33,152 (Alaska's FPG is higher than that of the continental U.S.).

The income limits vary widely, from 100 % of the federal poverty guidelines (which in 2009 stood at $ 22,050 for a family of four) to over 300 % of the guidelines, according to Rich Sagall, MD, president of NeedyMeds, an online clearinghouse of information for people who can not afford medicine.

As the article notes, schools in the MPCP cater to low - income, minority families; the program is limited to Milwaukee families within 300 percent of the federal poverty line, most of whom are African American or Hispanic.

In the principles, the groups highlight the important and historic role the federal government has played during the 50 years since the ESEA was originally passed in promoting educational opportunity and protecting the rights and interests of students disadvantaged by discrimination, poverty, and other conditions that may limit their educational attainment.

The current limit is 185 percent of the federal poverty level, which is $ 44,955 for a family of four in 2017 - 18.

The income limit for the tax credit scholarship recipients» families will be 300 percent of the federal poverty line, and a recipient can stay in the program if the family income rises to 400 percent.

The Assembly Speaker this week told a Capitol insider that «anything's possible» when it comes to raising income limits for voucher school eligibility to 300 percent of the federal poverty level, ($ 73,800 for family of four).

Qualifying students must reside in counties with more than 285,000 people and meet the income limit of 175 % of the Federal Poverty Level.

The proposed North Carolina's school voucher bill inserted into the House budget proposal also originally set the household income limit as high as 300 percent of the federal poverty level.

In Wisconsin, the governor raised the income eligibility limit on school vouchers in 2012 to 300 percent of the federal poverty level (again, that's $ 70,650 for a family of four), and families were no longer held to any income limits after the first year of receiving vouchers.

The author of the policy memo recommends that Wisconsin policymakers maintain the income threshold for voucher program participation at 185 percent of the federal poverty level, instead of increasing it to the proposed 300 percent income limit.

Currently, the program is limited to families who earn a combined income of 185 percent of the federal poverty level, or $ 45,263 for a family of four.

The committee also voted to raise the income limits for the statewide private voucher program to 220 percent of the federal poverty level.

Changes to family income eligibility — The measure drawing the most media attention calls for raising the family income eligibility limits for the statewide private voucher program from 185 percent of the federal poverty level to 220 percent, beginning in the 2018 - 19 school year.

Statewide Voucher Program — Income Eligibility Limit: Increase the annual family income eligibility level, beginning in the 2018 - 19 school year, so that a pupil could participate in the statewide voucher program with a family income of less than 220 percent of the federal poverty level rather than less than 185 percent of FPL as under current law.

ESEA was developed in response to the demands of communities during the civil rights movement that more be done by the federal government to address poverty and limited educational opportunity for people of color.

The federal law has its roots in civil rights reform, when its first iteration, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, was passed in 1965 to address poverty and limited educational opportunities for people of color.

And he's done it with limited funds in a district where 90 percent of the population lives at or below the federal poverty level.

Creation science vs. evolution, Genetic engineering, Homelessness, Euthanasia & assisted suicide, Pledge of Allegiance, Endangered Species, Organ Donation, Aging Population, Civil Rights, Racial Profiling, Drunk driving, Human Rights, World population, Children's rights, Alcohol & drinking, Gay Marriage, Disabilities Act, Acid Rain, Gangs, Drunk Driving, Animal Experimentation, War On Drugs, Language Policy, Famine Relief Efforts, Intellectual Property, Creationism, Moral Decisions, Civil rights, Organ & body donation, Nuclear proliferation, Sweatshops, Tobacco, American Education Reform, Cameras in Courtrooms, Sex Education, Missile Defense System, Adoption, City Curfews, Legal System, Civil Liberties, Bilingual Education, Global warming, Violence in schools, Legalization of marijuana, Immigration, Violence, Juvenile Crime, Social Welfare, Peace, Space Exploration, Physician - Assisted Suicide, Consumer Protection, Islamic Fundamentalism, Fathers» / Mothers» Rights In Divorce, Racial profiling, AIDS, Censorship, Environmental protection, Gun control, Affirmative action, Islamic Fundamentalism, Human Cloning, Minimum Wage, Dating Campus Issues, Campaign Finance Reform, Immigration, Garbage And Waste, Iraq, Fat Tax On Food, Federal Deficit, Family Violence, Agriculture Technology, Afghanistan, Smoking, Animal rights, Gender issues, Ethnic Violence, Intellectual Property, Foreign Policy, Dieting, Drug Policy, Social Welfare, War Crimes, Bilingual Education, Surrogate Mothers, Health Care System, Peer Pressure, Human Cloning, Speed Limits, Poverty, Same sex marriage, Homosexuality, Government vs. religion, Famine, Cuba, Amnesty, Endangered Oceans, Gay Rights, Legal System, Learning Disabilities, Islamic Fundamentalism Oceans, Living Wills, Biodiversity, Bio Fuels, Fraud, Garbage And Waste, Africa Aid, Women in the Military, Minorities, Pro Choice Movement, Zero Tolerance, Hate Crime, Antarctica Research, Gay Parents, Medical Ethics, Homeland Security, Terrorism, Binge drinking, Abortion, Welfare, Prayer in schools, Gangs, Death Penalty, Depression, Race Relations, Climate Change Policy, Agricultural Policy, Domestic Violence, Endangered, Endangered Species, Mass media Regulation, Conserving The Environment, Government Deregulation, Food Safety, Addiction, Gay Marriages, Academic Dishonesty, Organized Crime, Women's Rights, Chain Gangs, Anorexia Treatment, Water Pollution, Internet Hate Speech, Airline Safety Rules, Polygamy, Oil Spills, Legal System, Youth Violence, Computer Games.

While most agencies rely on the federal poverty line, it is not as precise as income limits published by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

This relatively high percentage helps close the gap that often exists between the federal poverty line and HUD's more flexible and location - sensitive income limits.

The Income - Based Repayment Plan limits payments to 15 % of discretionary income, which is defined as the amount your adjusted gross income exceeds 150 % of the federal poverty level.

Grants are made not only to families whose ability to pay veterinary costs is extremely limited, but also to those of somewhat more substantial means, up to 200 % of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, who may need only minor subsidy to meet the veterinary expenses.

Those experiencing chronic renal failure must have a household income of less than 150 % of the Federal Poverty Guideline and resource limits of $ 4,000 (for an individual) or $ 6,000 (for a couple).

There is a limit to how much you'll have to pay back if you make less than 400 % of the federal poverty line.

The Maryland legislature directed the state to extend coverage to individuals with an income of up to 200 % of the federal poverty level; the state currently has a more limited expansion that extends coverage only to women following a Medicaid - funded delivery.

It also permanently extends the Qualified Individual program, which pays Medicare Part B premiums for over 400,000 beneficiaries with incomes between 120 and 135 percent of the federal poverty level who have limited assets.