Sentences with phrase «federal poverty standards»

At study entry, 46 % of the families lived below federal poverty standards, and 90 % fell into the federal low - income category.

At the first assessment, PCs in the sample worked an average of 39.9 h per week, and 42.3 % lived below federal poverty standards, with a majority living below 150 % of the poverty threshold, and median monthly family income was $ 1,710.

The percentage is calculated by a formula that compares your family size, monthly income, and your monthly loan repayment amount to current federal poverty standards.

Not exact matches

The self - sufficiency standard differs from the federal poverty measure by factoring in a range of costs, family composition and geography.

Communities of color and those with low education and high poverty and unemployment face greater health risks even if their air quality meets federal health standards, according to the article published online in the scientific journal Environmental Health Perspectives.

These include a relatively standard set of student and family demographics: an indicator for whether anyone in the family received free or reduced - price meals at school in the past year, the family's income as a percentage of the federal poverty line, whether the child was born in the United States, whether the child lives with a single mother, and the highest level of education either parent has attained.

Others include the 1975 civil rights law mandating public education for special needs children, the bilingual education act of 1968, and the original civil rights education law, which passed in 1965 as part of President Johnson's war on poverty and mandated federal funding to states, equal access for all children, and higher standards.

The Problem of Head Start Nowhere is resistance to structured, curriculum - based, standards - and - assessment - driven early education clearer than in the big, iconic, federal early - childhood program known as Head Start, a legacy of Lyndon Johnson's mid-1960s declaration of war on poverty.

To complete her analysis, Cascio compared the academic outcomes of preschoolers who qualified for federal free - or reduced - price lunch programs, a standard measure of poverty, in states that offered universal preschool to similar preschoolers in states that offered only targeted preschool.

Doesn't faze the rich communities any, but for the rest of us, it's killing the middle class and still not generating enough funding for teachers and schools to keep pace with rising standards, a reform agenda gone awry, unfunded state and federal mandates, and ever increasing student poverty.

Gingrich, Sharpton and Duncan also visited Delaplaine McDaniel Elementary School in Philadelphia, a high - poverty school run by the district that met federal education standards for several consecutive years.

Unlike some voucher programs, LSP is «double targeted,» Wolf said; in order to be eligible for the funds, a student's family must make less than 250 percent above the federal poverty level — approximately $ 61,500 for a family of four — and be enrolled in a public school receiving a letter grade of «C» or below according to state standards.

The 21st Century Community Learning Centers (CCLC) Program provides federal funding for the establishment of community learning centers that provide academic, artistic and cultural enrichment opportunities — during non-school hours — for students, particularly those who attend high poverty and low - performing schools, to meet state and local standards in core academic subjects such as reading, math and science.

As we demonstrated in our 2015 analysis of the Common Core debate on Twitter, the dispute about the standards was largely a proxy war over other politically - charged issues, including opposition to a federal role in education, which many believe should be the domain of state and local education policy; a fear that the Common Core could become a gateway for access to data on children that might be used for exploitive purposes rather than to inform educational improvement; a source for the proliferation of testing which has come to oppressively dominate education; a way for business interests to exploit public education for private gain; or a belief that an emphasis on standards reform distracts from the deeper underlying causes of low educational performance, which include poverty and social inequity.

Children living below 100 % of the federal poverty line are twice as likely as children with family incomes over 200 % of the poverty line to attend schools with low academic standards (20 % versus 10 %).

Using data from the 2012 - 2013 school year, the study determined that 51 percent of all students in pre-kindergarten through 12th grade were eligible under the federal program for free and reduced - price lunch, a standard measure of the number of children living in poverty.

You've got a partial financial hardship id your annual federal student loan payments calculated under a ten - year standard repayment plan are greater than 15 % of the difference between your adjusted gross income (and that of a spouse, if you're married and file taxes jointly) and 150 % of the poverty guideline for your family size and state.

The federal poverty guidelines are the second component of this equation, and they're used to estimate costs of associated with a minimum standard of living in the United States.

The federal poverty guidelines are used to estimate the cost of maintaining a minimum standard of living in the United States for the purposes of determining eligibility for certain federal programs.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services determines the federal poverty level (FPL) every year, and these values are used to set the eligibility standards for Medicaid.

The reasoning behind this proposition is that: A) EBHV programs are designed to serve women categorized as «at - risk» due to a variety of demographic factors, including single - parent household status, age at time of first pregnancy, being categorically undereducated, under or unemployed, and meeting federal standards of living at or below the poverty line; B) these programs serve women during pregnancy and / or shortly after the birth of their children, offering an excellent chance for the early prevention of trauma exposure; and C) intervention services are provided at the same times that attachment (whether secure or insecure) is being developed between mothers and children, providing the opportunity that generational risk may be mitigated.

In 2015, 77 percent of families served by MIECHV - funded programs had incomes at or below the federal poverty level, and 46 percent of families were living in extreme poverty — at or below 50 percent of that guideline.11 The majority of those served by home visiting were young mothers, 39 percent were single mothers, and 43 percent were women of color.12 Through this targeting, home visiting programs aim to help families meet basic living standards when existing supports or income from work is falling short.