Sentences with phrase «federal privacy statute»

Court essentially holds «no harm, no foul» in case involving violation of federal privacy statute.

Not exact matches

In reviewing requests for additional data, consideration is given to access permitted by statute and federal law, privacy concerns, security procedures, the availability of staff to monitor the data release and the perceived benefits.

The FIPPs are a widely accepted framework that is at the core of the Privacy Act of 1974 and areare mirrored in other statutes, federal policy and guidance.

Canadian banks recognized immediately that such a system would violate all manner of federal and provincial financial privacy rules, and violate non-discrimination statutes in the Charter.

You will not, and will not allow or authorize others to, use the Services or the Sites to take any actions that: (i) infringe on any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other proprietary rights or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violate any applicable law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including those regarding export control); (iii) are defamatory, trade libelous, threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, stalking, harassment, abusive, tortuous, hateful, discriminatory based on race, ethnicity, gender, sex or disability, pornographic or obscene; (iv) interfere with or disrupt any services or equipment with the intent of causing an excessive or disproportionate load on the Animal League or its licensors or suppliers» infrastructure; (v) involve knowingly distributing viruses, Trojan horses, worms, or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines; (vi) involve the preparation and / or distribution of «junk mail», «spam», «chain letters», «pyramid schemes» or other deceptive online marketing practices or any unsolicited bulk email or unsolicited commercial email or otherwise in a manner that violate the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (CAN - SPAM Act of 2003); (vii) would encourage conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, federal or international laws, rules or regulations; (viii) involve the unauthorized entry to any machine accessible via the Services or interfere with the Sites or any servers or networks connected to the Sites or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Sites, or attempt to breach the security of or disrupt Internet communications on the Sites (including without limitation accessing data to which you are not the intended recipient or logging into a server or account for which you are not expressly authorized); (ix) impersonate any person or entity, including, without limitation, one of the Animal League's or other's officers or employees, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (x) forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any information transmitted through the Sites; (xi) collect or store personal data about other Animal League members, Site users or attempt to gain access to other Animal League members information, or otherwise mine information about Animal League members, Site users, or the Sites; (xii) execute any form of network monitoring or run a network analyzer or packet sniffer or other technology to intercept, decode, mine or display any packets used to communicate between the Sites» servers or any data not intended for you; (xiii) attempt to circumvent authentication or security of any content, host, network or account («cracking») on or from the Sites; or (xiv) are contrary to the Animal League's public image, goodwill, reputation or mission or otherwise not in furtherance of the Animal Leagues stated purposes.

She has defended both individual and class action litigation brought under various state and federal consumer fraud and privacy statutes.

* Reporting obligations may come from federal law, especially where there is no provincial private - sector privacy statute.

A former healthcare corporate counsel, compliance, and privacy officer for a publicly traded healthcare company, Robert Slavkin represents a variety of clients within the healthcare sector, providing guidance on complex issues and compliance with all appropriate federal and state statutes and...

We provide advice and guidance in the application of federal and provincial privacy statutes and the development of privacy procedures and policies.

These most recent laws, regulations, and legislative proposals come against the backdrop of decades of privacy - enhancing statutes passed at the federal level to enact safeguards in fields ranging from government data files to video rental records.

In addition to the disclosures explicitly permitted in the statute, the Privacy Act permits agencies to disclose information for other purposes compatible with the purpose for which the information was collected by identifying the disclosure as a «routine use» and publishing notice of it in the Federal Register.

Many commenters raised questions about how different federal statutes and regulations intersect with the privacy regulation.

There are three exceptions to this general rule of preemption: State laws that the Secretary determines are necessary for certain purposes set forth in the statute; state laws that the Secretary determines address controlled substances; and state laws relating to the privacy of Start Printed Page 82471individually identifiable health information that are contrary to and more stringent than the federal requirements.

As discussed above, our reading of the statutes together is that the effect of section 264 (c)(2) is only to leave in place state privacy protections that would otherwise apply and that are more stringent than the federal privacy protections.

Even with respect to state laws relating to the privacy of medical information, the statute shields such state laws from preemption by the federal standards only if they are «more» stringent than the related federal standard or implementation specification.

This approach is a key component of the final Privacy Rule, and it adheres to section 4 (a) of Executive Order 13132, which expressly contemplates preemption when there is a conflict between exercising state and federal authority under federal statute.

PIPEDA — we call it — is enforced by the federal Privacy Commissioner then, British Columbia, Alberta and Quebec have each passed their own privacy stPrivacy Commissioner then, British Columbia, Alberta and Quebec have each passed their own privacy stprivacy statutes.

In addition to privacy provisions in federal laws, such as the Gramm - Leach - Bliley Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act, there are now varying privacy statutes in 25 states.

In general, the laws, rules and regulations that apply to our business practices include, without limitation, the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the federal Fair Housing Act, the Dodd - Frank Act, and federal advertising and other laws, as well as comparable state statutes; rules of trade organization such as NAR, local MLSs, and state and local AORs; licensing requirements and related obligations that could arise from our business practices relating to the provision of services other than real estate brokerage services; privacy regulations relating to our use of personal information collected from the registered users of our websites; laws relating to the use and publication of information through the Internet; and state real estate brokerage licensing requirements, as well as statutory due diligence, disclosure, record keeping and standard - of - care obligations relating to these licenses.