Sentences with phrase «federal research spending into»

Under President Donald Trump's 2018 budget proposal, federal research spending into all three areas — and many others — would decline abruptly.

Not exact matches

«Depending on whether you're a Republican or a Democrat, passage of the Scientific Research in the National Interest Act (HR 3293) is either a simple reminder that federal dollars should be spent wisely, or an unwise and unwarranted intrusion into NSF's grantsmaking process.»

Assuming the winner didn't capture a majority of the vote, second place would have been good enough to get Westin into a May runoff for the chance to unseat Representative John Culberson, a nine - term Republican who chairs a spending panel that shapes the budgets of several federal research agencies.

But new federal spending initiatives, such as the Canada Research Chairs and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) infrastructure grants, are breathing new life into scientific research inResearch Chairs and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) infrastructure grants, are breathing new life into scientific research inresearch in Canada.

All federal spending on research and development (about $ 140 billion in 2015) fits into the relatively small «discretionary spending» portion of the federal budget.

Despite a recent budget proposal from the Obama administration to increase spending on federal R&D by 7 % next year, dollars flowing to research have largely been flat in recent years, and declining when inflation is taken into account.

«Rather than inject politics into this process, our discussion today should instead concentrate on how to safeguard the often unexpected process of discovery inherent in scientific inquiry, while ensuring that federal dollars spent on research remains completely and fully accountable taxpayers.»

The federal, Ontario and Quebec governments say they will spend $ 200 million to help fund research into 5G wireless technology, the next - generation networks with download speeds 100 times faster than current ones can handle.

We've spent years on federal research and more time getting Reading First underway, only to have it turn into another political football.

Puzzlingly, lack of research evidence has not stimulated rigorous research (funded by the federal government or the nation's many foundations, for example) into why so little if any progress occurred and how federal money was actually used by the schools or departments of education that spent it.

Such a dilemma brings to question the debate over government subsidies, as well as the billions of dollars in federal spending that gets dumped into the research well.