Sentences with phrase «federal school choice»

At the same, time, the budget would increase investment in federal school choice programs.

As is so often the case, the most vocal opponents of federal school choice are right for the wrong reasons.

So far, DeVos has largely remained silent on her plans for any major policy shifts, but we asked a group of experts across the ideological spectrum to discuss what changes might be in store for federal school choice policy and for the Office for Civil Rights.

One thing seems certain, a month into DeVos» tenure: Any changes her administration does make to limit the work of the Office of Civil Rights or expand federal school choice programs will be closely followed and scrutinized by her allies and her detractors.

The 74 Don't Believe the Hype: Local Education Advocates Say They See Little Change in DeVos's Views on Federal School Choice Program

Tom Carroll and Neal McCluskey discuss whether a federal school choice tax credit program is a good idea here.

On Tuesday, April 25th, the Fordham Institute, Education Next and the Hoover Institution hosted two discussions on what a $ 20 billion federal school choice tax credit program could look like.

RH: When he was a candidate, President Trump talked about launching a big federal school choice initiative.

On Tuesday, April 25th, the Fordham Institute, Education Next and the Hoover Institution hosted two discussions on what a $ 20 billion federal school choice tax - credit program could look like.

Not exact matches

Issued by the government, federal student loans are most students» first choice to pay for school.

High school lunch programs have offered students a choice of foods since federal legislation mandated it in 1975.

The bill has met with opposition in Congress in part because it presents the terrible choice of increasing school food spending at the expense of SNAP, i.e., the federal food stamps program.

The kids tell me the food sucks now lol but they do nt see the bigger picture either... while it was a different era for us when us parents were in school; the fundamental rights shouldve remained the same... which is give the kids their choices... the Federal Gov can INCLUDE nutritious items on the free lunch menus while including more choices for them instead of reducing them to avoid social stigmas within the student body of the schools... Kids can be so cruel... Ive lived that first hand... I'm wondering who to contact to protest these changes.

Of particular note was Vilsack's announcement of an additional $ 8 million in federal funding for schools to assist with professional training as well as implementation of the «Smarter Lunchroom» techniques, which are proven to nudge kids into making healthier choices.

President Donald Trump on March 16 took the first step to make good on his campaign promise to shift federal tax dollars from traditional public schools to a «choice» program that promotes charters, private and religious schools.

Federal policy should encourage school choice, require baseline achievement standards to receive Federal money and promote academic innovation by the states.

Now that the researchers have extensive data on children's physical activity patterns and lunch choices, the investigators are seeking federal funding to create feasible and sustainable school interventions based on their findings.

«Federal school lunch guidelines lead to healthier choices, study shows.»

Recent federal recommendations against offering the inhaled nasal influenza vaccine due to lack of effectiveness could lead to more flu illness in the U.S. if the inhaled vaccine becomes effective again or if not having the choice of the needle-less vaccine substantially reduces immunization rates, according to a new analysis led by University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine scientists.

Increasing numbers of U.S. students, over time, are attending public schools of choice rather than their neighborhood schools, a federal study concludes.

A team of conservative legal scholars last week filed a complaint charging that two Southern California school districts fail to offer students school choice as required under federal law and asked the U.S. Department of Education to withhold the districts» federal funds.

The Federal government offers Magnet Schools Assistance grants to districts as a way to promote this more positive school choice option that meets the unique needs of the learners who attend them.

The Los Angeles Unified and Compton Unified school districts haven't adequately notified parents of their school choice rights, and they haven't provided enough options for the children currently attending schools defined as in need of improvement under the federal No Child Left...

States should seize the possibilities for more innovative approaches to school improvement posed by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), which replaces a law much criticized for its heavy - handed federal role and for focusing schools heavily on teaching for low - level multiple - choice tests in reading and math to the neglect of other subject areas and higher - level skills.

What's more, schools that don't make AYP have to set aside a portion of their federal Title I dollars for tutoring and school choice.

On average, participating low - income students are performing better in reading because the federal government decided to launch an experimental school choice program in our nation's capital.

Regulations and guidance can create a «safe place» for forward - leaning state and local leaders that want to align their federal funds with their own decisions — and dollars — by which to expand school choice.

I do expect the administration to make an effort to act on President - elect Trump's campaign proposal to devote 20 billion federal dollars to expanding school choice for low - income students, but it's a bit hard to see a Republican Congress either approving that much new spending or even redirecting existing funds on which districts currently rely.

And to receive federal dollars, districts must give parents the freedom to use this information to select the school of their choice — traditional public, charter, or private.

One sensible move is to embrace full Title I portability, so that states can use federal funds to help low - income students attend the district, charter, or private school of their choice.

The unprecedented public interest in the DeVos nomination reflects great interest in how Congress and the Trump administration might try to promote school choice via the federal role.

The president's first budget proposal, released in May, includes an increase of nearly $ 200 million for the federal Charter Schools Program and a package of other choice - friendly programs.

Make it easier for states to expand school choice: As states increasingly adopt choice - based models, ranging from Nevada's Education Savings Accounts to Louisiana's «course choice» programs, Congress should adapt funding requirements to ensure that federal funds serve the intended beneficiaries without tying states» hands.

The research represents each level of government — federal, state, and district — and focuses on state - federal relationships and the effects of school choice and supplemental education services on school districts.

Lawmakers considering portability or other federal voucher programs must understand that the concept of federal dollars going into a «backpack of cash» that follows eligible students to the schools of their choice, whether public or private, is only part of the story.

The Republican candidates all stress accountability and favor school choice, though they prefer leaving the federal government out of education policy decisions.

The implementation of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA); debates about a potential large - scale federal school - choice initiative; and deep disagreements about civil rights enforcement continue to captivate — and roil — all of us involved in education policy, in D.C. and around the nation.

Although the administration has proposed cutting the U.S. Department of Education's budget by 13.5 percent, it seeks a $ 1.4 billion federal investment in school choice.

• School choice — a strong effort to provide additional federal funds to states that allow funding to follow students to their public or private school of cSchool choice — a strong effort to provide additional federal funds to states that allow funding to follow students to their public or private school of cschool of choice.

Knowing this, Duncan designed Race to the Top, an ingenious program that gave states the chance to dip into a $ 4.35 billion pot of federal money if they adopted certain accountability and school choice policies.

Tom Carroll wrote in more detail about how a tax credit scholarship program could work in «A Federal Scholarship Tax Credit: The Only Fifty - State School - Choice Option.»

The strategies of that era — including high academic standards for all students, measuring academic progress, improving teaching, and introducing school choice to a monopoly system — found reinforcement in federal law with the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001.

Other federal officials are talking about school choice as well.

The New Normal for Federal Education Spending (3/4/10) Choice and Residential Segregation (2/23/10) Studies Find No Effects (1/7/10) Focus of School Reform Shifting to Teachers (12/17/09) Are Middle Schools or Middle Schoolers the Problem?

In October 2002, the federal Department of Education distributed nearly $ 24 million in grants to Arkansas, Florida, Minnesota, and districts in six other states to expand their public school choice programs.

• Leverage federal, state, and private dollars into systems to equalize funding, pay for school start - ups and human capital training, and develop new information and enrollment systems to help families navigate their choices and become savvy school choice consumers.

The federal No Child Left Behind Act, which President George W. Bush signed into law last year, represented a victory for the advocates of public school choice: the law rejected funding for private school vouchers, but did mandate that districts allow children in persistently failing schools to transfer to public schools that perform better.

In Kansas City in the late 1980s and early»90s, African American parents were justifiably irate when the federal court's integration plan denied their children access to the magnet schools of their choice because so many seats had been set aside for white children — who did not show up in sufficient numbers to fill them.

The law has split the Right between those who cheer accountability and those who jeer federal overreach and insufficient attention to school choice.

Well - functioning school choice requires a federal role in gathering and disseminating high - quality data on school performance; ensures that civil rights laws are enforced; distributes funds based on enrollment of high - need students in particular schools; and supports a growing supply of school options through an expanded, equitably funded charter sector and through the unfettered growth of digital learning via application of the U.S. Constitution's commerce clause.