Not exact matches
The report, conducted by the Center on Education
Policy, a Washington - based research organization that tracks implementation of the
federal law, found that
schools and districts are better aligning instruction and state standards, that test scores are rising, and that the number of
schools labeled «in need of
improvement» is holding steady.
Frequent topics include
school improvement, leadership, standards, accountability, the achievement gap, classroom practice, professional development, teacher education, research, technology and innovations in teaching and learning, state and
federal policy, and education and the global economy.
There is growing
policy; fiscal and practical support for prosocial educational and
school climate
improvement efforts from
federal agencies, state departments of education and large and small districts across America.
There is growing
policy; fiscal and practical support for prosocial educational and
school climate
improvement efforts from
federal agencies, state departments of education and large and small distri... Read More...
In higher - performing districts, leaders did not expect
improvement in lowperforming
schools to occur merely by means of inputs required under
federal and state
policies (e.g.,
school choice, tutoring, prescribed needs assessments and schoolimprovement planning, curriculum audits, advice from external consultants).
Much will change in practice and
policy as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) replaces the law, regulations, and guidance established through NCLB; but two elements of the new legislation stand out: the shift away from
federal mandates toward greater state and local authority, and the emphasis on evidence - based
school improvement practices.
Advocates for parent and community engagement see the newly revised
federal K - 12 law as an opportunity to expand their impact on states» academic goals, plans for
school improvement, and other areas of
policy.
What is needed instead is a fundamental shift in direction in
federal education
policy, and ESSA is not it; therefore every family that can afford it should opt out of state
schooling whenever possible until No Child Left Behind's failed strategy for social
improvement via annual testing and publishing the results is abandoned entirely, and until Sacramento gets serious about subsidiary devolution, which implies that assessing and reporting on the results of local
schools should be left to the local districts, whose citizens may have different priorities and values that the state and
federal governments should learn to respect.
This brief examines why
policies known as «last in, first out» may disproportionately affect
schools receiving
federal School Improvement Grants.
State education agencies (SEAs) are required by
federal policy to provide a statewide system of intensive and sustained support to Title I
schools and districts identified as in need of
improvement due to persistently low student performance.
These profiles illuminate how
federal policies and programs can accelerate
school improvement by highlighting the experiences of New Leaders in the field.
Instructional Leadership, Defined Despite 30 years of research showing the direct and indirect impact
school principals have on student achievement and
school improvement,
federal policy has largely overlooked the vital role of the principal as instructional leader.
Many of the
federal requirements in the areas of accountability, assessments, and
school improvement have changed, with many of the decisions about these
policies now to be made at the state or local level.
At the start of the 21st century, new state and
federal accountability
policies — with their widely publicized results on standardized tests and penalties for
schools that failed to meet
improvement targets — led central - office administrators to closely manage
schools.
Duncan's
policies, which have often relied on competitive grant programs, but he disagrees with Duncan's prescriptive turnaround plans — currently in effect in districts that have taken
federal School Improvement Grants.
The national
policy landscape surrounding academic standards, assessments, accountability, and
school improvement is in many respects more chaotic than ever as states transition away from strong
federal systems and requirements under NCLB and once again take the lead role in defining and enforcing accountability measures for public
schools.
Decades of research confirms that positive parental involvement is critical for students» success in
school, and
federal policy mandates effective programs at all
school levels; however, parent involvement often remains on the back burner of
school improvement initiatives.