Not exact matches
As I understand it, because the Trump proposal is only looking (right now) at discretionary spending, it has no effect on the mandatory funding of
federal school meal programs,
including the lunch and breakfast
program.
Every district participating in the
federal meals program is required to have a written policy that
includes nutrition guidelines for all foods available at
school (hello, birthday cupcakes!)
But, at least at present, the ultimate check is a triennial audit by the state agencies overseeing
federal school meal programs; this audit covers hundreds of items, everything from food safety to sanitation, and also
includes determining whether a district has a wellness policy in place that's being enforced.
Still another policy called for by SNA would extend the comment period on the «Smart Snacks in
Schools» standards which, for the first time ever, will (beginning July 1st) impose some regulations on «competitive foods» sold at
school outside of
federal meal programs,
including at a la carte snack bars, vending machines, and student stores.
Participate in available
federal school meal programs, including the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program (including after - school snacks), Summer Food Service Program, Fruit and Vegetable Snack Program, and Child and Adult Care Food Program (including sup
school meal programs,
including the
School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program (including after - school snacks), Summer Food Service Program, Fruit and Vegetable Snack Program, and Child and Adult Care Food Program (including sup
School Breakfast
Program, National
School Lunch Program (including after - school snacks), Summer Food Service Program, Fruit and Vegetable Snack Program, and Child and Adult Care Food Program (including sup
School Lunch
Program (
including after -
school snacks), Summer Food Service Program, Fruit and Vegetable Snack Program, and Child and Adult Care Food Program (including sup
school snacks), Summer Food Service
Program, Fruit and Vegetable Snack
Program, and Child and Adult Care Food
Program (
including suppers).
To continue to keep Chinese - processed chicken out of
school meals and other
federal child nutrition
programs, this provision will need to appear in subsequent annual appropriations bills, or it will need to be
included in the five - year child nutrition reauthorization bill in 2015.
But now Representative DeLauro has just introduced the Safe Chicken and Meat for Children Act of 2015 which, if passed, will permanently ban Chinese meat and poultry from
federal child nutrition
programs,
including school meals.
Advocates can expand the Afterschool
Meal Program and obtain federal reimbursement using proven outreach strategies, including promoting the program, building relationships with afterschool and out - of - school time provider networks, connecting sites to available community resources, and working closely with the state
Program and obtain
federal reimbursement using proven outreach strategies,
including promoting the
program, building relationships with afterschool and out - of - school time provider networks, connecting sites to available community resources, and working closely with the state
program, building relationships with afterschool and out - of -
school time provider networks, connecting sites to available community resources, and working closely with the state agency.
Senate Republican leaders indicated last week that they may not
include provisions in their welfare - reform bill that would convert the
federal school -
meals and child - nutrition
programs into block grants, as its House counterpart would do.
This effect of
including federal funds reflects the fact that the bulk of
federal education dollars are allocated based largely on the income profile of the communities
schools serve, primarily through
federal subsidies for free and reduced price
meals and under Title I of the ESEA.19 But because subsidies for
school lunch
programs are the largest source of
federal funds flowing to
schools, those concerned with equity must determine how expenditures of those non-instructional funds are considered.
We are talking with people in Maryland who have benefitted or are currently benefitting from the
federal nutrition
programs, including SNAP (called the Food Supplement Program or FSP in Maryland and formerly known as Food Stamps), WIC, School Breakfast Program, the Afterschool Meal Program, and the Summer Nutrition P
programs,
including SNAP (called the Food Supplement
Program or FSP in Maryland and formerly known as Food Stamps), WIC,
School Breakfast
Program, the Afterschool
Meal Program, and the Summer Nutrition
ProgramsPrograms.
Expanding the
federal school breakfast and lunch
program in order to provide free
meals to all students —
including in the summer months — would reduce childhood hunger and improve children's health and academic outcomes.
The Academy advocates to protect and expand
federal anti-poverty and safety net
programs,
including those that provide health care (and access to health care through Medicaid and CHIP), early education (such as Head Start and Early Head Start), quality child care, affordable housing and home visiting, as well as critical nutrition assistance
programs like WIC, SNAP,
school meals, and summer feeding
programs.