Via the Los Angeles Times Running the schools was a lot simpler before there were
federal standards and accountability tests and a commitment to closing the achievement gap for disadvantaged students.
Not exact matches
The new
federal Every Student Succeeds Act, was endorsed by more than 35 civil rights organizations to ensure high
standards and accountability for the progress of all students, the official said.
The move toward federally imposed
accountability standards is necessary to ensure that
federal funds are enhancing educational opportunity, especially for poor
and minority students.
When it comes to the study of implementing education reforms, analysts tend to focus on the formal channels of implementation
and the
standard tools of public administration — for example, intergovernmental hand - offs (
federal to state to district to school), alignment of curriculum, assessment
and other components of the reform, professional development, getting incentives right,
and accountability mechanisms.
For one thing, in getting a waiver from the
federal No Child Left Behind Act, Indiana (like other states) promised the Obama administration it would adopt
standards that met
federal criteria; align curricula
and teaching; select, pilot,
and administer new tests aligned to the
standards;
and integrate the
standards into both school -
and teacher -
accountability systems.
(It escapes me why he then urges that states be placed in sole charge of school
standards and accountability with no
federal involvement at all.)
State
and federal school
accountability programs hold schools to specific
standards of academic performance
and assume each school is given a fair shake at accomplishing the task of educating its students.
But Tennessee earned almost full marks (98 percent) on the section of the competition (weighted a substantial 14 percent of all possible points) devoted to «adopting
standards and assessments,» even though its
standards have remained extremely low ever since the
federal accountability law took hold.
Since that time, states — spurred in part by the requirements of the
federal No Child Left Behind Act — have enacted many of that movement's building blocks related to
standards, testing,
and accountability.
On top of the daily challenges of education, which include
standards - based reform, pressing state
and federal mandates,
and high stakes
accountability, the Meridian educators were facing a year of unfamiliarity in leadership considering a newly - hired superintendent
and an administration that is approximately one - third new.
This is evident in the
federal law's requirement that each state's
accountability system generate a report card for each school
and district indicating the proportion of students meeting proficiency
standards on state tests of math
and reading.
For example, what if top - down
accountability as defined
and enforced by states
and the
federal government were limited to basic skills, something like the MCTs of the 1970s but based on clear, empirically validated
standards about what students need to know
and be able to do to hold down the types of jobs that do not require a college degree?
In fact, the modern
accountability movement, right through to the
federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, owes much to Shanker's relentless calls for higher
standards, assessments,
and consequences for poor performance.
Under present day
standards and accountability systems, states, pushed
and prodded by the
federal government, have moved from trying to force districts to educate students to a minimum level of basic skills
and to do something about schools that are obviously failing, to holding districts, schools
and teachers accountable for (in the words of the Common Core State
Standards Initiative) «preparing all students for success in college, career,
and life.»
During the 1994 reauthorization of the
federal Elementary
and Secondary Education Act, which ultimately forced the states to begin developing their
accountability systems, Shanker was a staunch proponent of tough
standards,
and penned a pivotal article blasting a proposal to water down the bill.
States labored for decades to put such
standards in place, prodded in 1994 by the
federal Goals 2000 Act, then in 2002 by the No Child Left Behind Act, with its insistence on annual testing
and consequential
accountability.
Even the 1994
federal Title I reforms, which required states to develop the three major prongs of an effective
accountability system (academic
standards, tests linked to the
standards,
and a mixture of assistance
and sanctions for low - performing schools) did little to stimulate California into action.
The
accountability standards mandated by state
and federal legislators are becoming increasingly difficult to meet for many schools.
Leveraging the
federal role by using the Higher Education Act to offer students incentives to graduate ready for college
and the workplace, support state efforts to raise high school exit
standards and strengthen postsecondary
accountability,
and by aligning the 12th grade National Assessment of Educational Progress to ADP's benchmarks;
and,
For the past three decades, public school
accountability had generally been heading in one direction: toward common
standards, standardized tests,
and a bigger role for the
federal government in shaping how states gauge student performance
and improve schools.
The law is meant to ensure states are free to make decisions about
accountability, school improvement,
standards,
and assessments without
federal interference... If the secretary chooses to ignore the law, then Congress
and state
and local leaders can use the tools they have to hold the secretary accountable, [a GOP aide] said.
Frequent topics include school improvement, leadership,
standards,
accountability, the achievement gap, classroom practice, professional development, teacher education, research, technology
and innovations in teaching
and learning, state
and federal policy,
and education
and the global economy.
Support this effort through a range of tiered incentives, such as providing states with greater flexibility in the use of existing
federal funds, supporting a revised state
accountability structure,
and offering financial support for states to implement the
standards.
This 2001
federal law is designed to raise academic
standards, close achievement gaps, encourage more school
accountability,
and offer more choices to families
and students.
National
standards would strengthen
federal control over education while weakening schools» direct
accountability to parents
and taxpayers.
Requirements for states to implement systems of
standards, assessments,
and accountability have been the central feature of
federal elementary
and secondary education programs since 1994.
And if you're at all interested in standards, assessments, accountability, and / or the consequences of the federal government's deep engagement in key elements of schooling, I think you'll find this brief very much worth your ti
And if you're at all interested in
standards, assessments,
accountability,
and / or the consequences of the federal government's deep engagement in key elements of schooling, I think you'll find this brief very much worth your ti
and / or the consequences of the
federal government's deep engagement in key elements of schooling, I think you'll find this brief very much worth your time.
Michigan is one of 42 states to receive a waiver from the 13 - year - old
federal law in exchange for implementing requirements like career -
and college - ready
standards, stronger school
accountability standards and a system to evaluate teachers
and identify underperforming ones.
«A bipartisan bill will not have everything that everyone wants, but it must build on our common interests: high
standards; flexibility for states, school districts
and schools;
and a more focused
federal role that promotes equity,
accountability and reform,» U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said in a statement about Harkin's bill Tuesday.
Superintendents acknowledge that
federal and state
standards and accountability systems have created a situation in which district
and school personnel can not ignore evidence about students who are struggling or failing to meet mandated
standards for academic performance, as reflected in test results
and other indicators of student success (e.g., attendance, graduation rates).
In addition, the main thrust of the report's criticism, that the state's ESSA plan is not sufficiently similar to what it would have been had No Child Left Behind remained in effect, assumes the test - based
accountability strategy that these reviewers have made their careers pursuing had been effective, which it has not;
and therefore, when coupled with the false claim that California has high - quality academic
standards and assessments, which it doesn't (California's
standards being based on the Common Core, which leaves American students 2 - 3 years behind their peers in East Asia
and northern Europe), California's families remain well advised to opt out of state schooling wherever
and whenever possible, until the overreach from both the
federal and state capitals is brought to an end
and local schools that want to pursue genuinely world - class excellence can thrive.
For all the schools
and districts sampled in our study, state
and federal curriculum policies,
standards,
and accountability systems influenced direction setting pervasively.
In combination, these initiatives have progressively increased the demands on teachers
and their students
and have laid the groundwork for what was to come next - an unprecedented
federal intervention on state level education policy - making that directs all states toward a single goal (i.e., 100 % of students reaching «proficiency») via a single system of implementation (i.e.,
standards - based assessment
and accountability).
«I came to believe that
accountability, as written into
federal law, was not raising
standards but dumbing down the schools as states
and districts strived to meet unrealistic targets,» she writes.
WakeEd has previously advocated for creating a single
accountability tool that meets the
federal standards and fairly reports the performance of public schools across the state.
``... Hoosier schools would have to comply with
federal accountability standards and would be at risk of losing
federal education dollars.
Additionally, we create resources
and leverage existing resources from a range of
federal networks to provide the most up - to - date information about states»
standards, assessment,
and accountability systems.
During his tenure, he made the MTA the voice of the profession
and established the teachers union as a partner in developing
and implementing state
and federal policy such as teacher - evaluation frameworks, new curriculum
standards, district
and school
accountability measures, while strengthening labor - management collaboration focused on improving student achievement.
The yearslong districtwide scheme denied an untold number of students the right to a proper education by fraudulently boosted the district's test scores, attendance
and graduation rates to meet
federal accountability standards.
State
and federal efforts to bolster
standards and accountability place increasing demands on schools
and aim to transform the role of the principal.
The California Charter Schools Association (CCSA) has repeatedly gone on record debunking
and factually proving that charters are public schools, kids in charters are achieving academically, charters are non-profits, comply with
federal and state laws, are held to exceptionally high
standards of
accountability,
and supports anyone from the community whose primary concern is advocating
and creating high quality education opportunities for students.
The EOCEP encourages instruction in the specific academic
standards for the courses, encourages student achievement,
and documents the level of students» mastery of the academic
standards.To meet
federal accountability requirements, the EOCEP in mathematics, English / language arts
and science will be administered to all public school students by the third year of high school, including those students as required by the
federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA)
and by Title 1 of the Elementary
and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
In order to be eligible for the TCEP grant, the charter school must be accredited, qualify as a «charter school» under the
federal definition,
and meet the following academic
and financial
accountability standards:
This is the issue behind the revealing exchange between DeVos
and Sen. Tim Kaine (D - VA) at her confirmation hearing in which she refused to say that all schools receiving
federal aid should be held to the same
accountability standards and IDEA requirements.
Additionally, summative assessments help ensure that schools meet
federal and state
accountability standards.
This year it is waiver of NCLB
standards, as we hear of cheating, students
and schools that are not meeting the latest
standards, increased pressure for student
accountability,
and state
and federal budget woes.
The Kansas Assessment Program (KAP) includes a variety of tests aligned to Kansas» content
standards, which help educators
and policymakers evaluate student learning
and meet the requirements for
federal and state
accountability.
Increasing funding in 2002, No Child Left Behind required the adoption of a common set of english
and math
standards correlated with achievement goals along, measured by standardized testing for
federal accountability.
It focuses mostly on
standards for
accountability and transparency,
and vastly increases the amount of information states will be required to share in annual «school report cards,» which will give parents better data on school performance
and help guide where
federal education money is most needed.
Sometimes people wonder why I'm so consumed with issues around educational equity, school choice,
standards,
accountability and the need for a strong
federal role in education.