Sentences with phrase «federal trademark case»

Lex Machina's Legal Analytics for Trademark Litigation enables attorneys and mark owners for the first time to make data - driven decisions about federal trademark case strategy and tactics.

Not exact matches

In a federal trademark infringement case, for instance, a plaintiff seeking a quick injunction would encounter at the threshold the high hurdle of showing «irreparable harm» — a standard that won't be met if money damages will provide the plaintiff with adequate recompense for any damages incurred — and it might also have to post an expensive bond (a major hurdle for a nonprofit).

There was a similar case in Germany, when the Federal Patent Court (FPC) rejected an application for a shape trademark application for sweets, based on its «mere technical function».

Mr. Stellabotte is a registered patent attorney and has extensive experience litigating patent, copyright, trade secret, antitrust, contract, tort, trademark, false advertising, and information technology related matters in federal and state trial and appellate courts, including case preparation and strategy, fact and expert discovery, depositions, motion practice, Markman hearings, preliminary injunction hearings, bench and jury trials, arbitrations, mediations, appeals, and settlement negotiations.

The federal court hearing the case ruled that Coors «had established a defense of parody, defeating Eveready's claims of copyright and trademark infringement.»

We have litigated a wide variety of jury cases, bench trials, Federal Circuit appeals and U.S. Patent and Trademark Office interferences and other proceedings across a wide range of technical areas, including:

He has prepared many briefs to the United States Courts of Appeals, including to the Sixth Circuit in a contracts / agricultural law case, to the Federal Circuit in a gray market case, and many matters to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, involving claims for allowance / rejection of registration of trademarks.

Throughout her career, she has successfully tried patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright cases in Federal Courts nationwide.

He has successfully tried patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright cases in Federal Courts nationwide, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, and the International Trade Commission.

She also has experience litigating patent infringement, trademark infringement, copyright infringement, unfair competition, and false advertising cases in federal courts across the country.

The Expansion of Anti-SLAPP Motions into Copyright and Trademark Cases and the Threat to the Existence of Anti-SLAPP Motions in Federal -LSB-...]

As trial counsel, Mr. Davis has obtained favorable verdicts for his clients in jury and bench trials in both state and federal courts in a wide variety of trademark, patent and trade secrets cases, as well as breach of contract and corporate matters.

He has successfully tried patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright cases in Federal Courts nationwide and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.

Courtney Culver Baker has experience throughout the State of Texas in both state and federal courts, as well as the Fifth Circuit, representing corporate, not - for - profit and individual clients both in pursuing and defending cases in areas including business and contract disputes, real estate, catastrophic personal injury, ad valorem taxation, securities disputes, insurance coverage, professional liability and trademark infringement.

Frank has successfully tried patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright cases in Federal Courts nationwide, the Courts of Appeals for the Sixth and Federal Circuits, and the International Trade Commission.

We have tried hundreds of cases before juries and judges, in federal and state courts, administrative bodies such as the Patent and Trademark Office and the International Trade Commission (ITC), Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) and in a myriad of foreign tribunals.

She has tried patent, trademark and copyright cases in Federal courts nationwide, including Delaware, California, Texas, Illinois, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Utah, Florida, Ohio, Indiana, the Federal Circuit and Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Linda has tried patent, trademark, and copyright cases in Federal courts nationwide, including Delaware, California, Texas, Illinois, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Utah, Florida, Ohio, Indiana, and the Federal Circuit and Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Decisions in Canadian trademark cases are binding on lower courts if they are decided by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal, or the court of appeal in any given Province.

Our lawyers have played an integral role in many of the most significant cases across the globe over the past several years, including internal and governmental investigations; international arbitration proceedings; patent, copyright and trademark cases; regulatory, government and public policy disputes; securities class action lawsuits; and federal and state appellate cases.

Lex Machina's trademark data lets you analyze federal cases with one or more claims involving Lanham Act violations, including claims of trademark infringement, trademark dilution, unfair competition, or cybersquatting, including declaratory judgment actions.

Bergman has extensive trial experience in state and federal courts, litigating unfair competition, false advertising, trademark, trade dress and copyright infringement cases along with class actions and other complex business disputes.

She has represented clients in a variety of cases in federal court involving issues of patent and trademark infringement, copyright infringement, false advertising, unfair competition, and trade secrets.

In more than 20 years of practicing law, Steve has served as lead trial counsel and successfully represented clients in numerous patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark / trade dress cases in federal district courts throughout the US.

Tokyo - based developer Emonster kk sued Apple on Wednesday, Oct. 18, in a San Francisco federal court, claiming it holds the U.S. trademark for the term «animoji» and that Apple using the same name for its Animoji feature is a «textbook case» of trademark infringement, as Reuters reports.

Tags for this Online Resume: Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), State procurement systems, Request for Proposal (RFP), Request for Quote (RFQ), Request for Information (RFI), procurement, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as re-authorized, Incorporation Law, Trademark Law, Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS), VoIP, E911 Requirements, Appropriations Law, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Windows Server 2000 / 2003/2008, Microsoft Office, Web Application Development Project Management, Requirements Gathering, Usability Studies / Use Case, Session Initiated Protocol (SIP), H. 323, H. 263, H. 264 Video Codec, G711 Audio Codec, Asterisk Open Source IP PBX, Media Gateway Translation (SIP - H.323) Design, Virtualization Technologies, Text Telephone Devices (TTY), Closed Captioning, Video Conferencing Equipment, Polycom, Tandberg, Netmeeting, D - Link, Grandstream, Logitech

In a 1979 case filed in Federal District Court in Illinois, the American Society of Real Estate Counselors, a NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS ® (NAR) affiliate, brought a trademark infringement action against the American College of Real...