Sentences with phrase «federal undertaking»

Unless a business comes within the definition of federal undertaking in the Canada Labour Code, no question of federal jurisdiction in labour relations arises.

[24] The first is whether the appellant comes within the general description in the first part of the definition of federal undertaking in the Canada Labour Code - a work, undertaking or business that is within the legislative authority of Parliament.

No matter where one stands on the debate over safety - net programs like welfare and food stamps, or massive federal undertakings like Obamacare, everyone agrees that those need taxation to fund them.

For example, the Agencies may rely on the findings and determination from a consultation that occurred between a State agency and the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) on the effects of a potential Federal undertaking on a historic property that occurred prior to the Agency's involvement without re-initiating Section 106 consultation.

IDBI Federal undertakes not to disclose the personal information provided by you to any person, unless such action is necessary to:

[62][In cases dealing with federal works and undertakings such as] pipelines, railways and airports, it is not the case that validly - enacted provincial laws, in this case municipal bylaws, somehow cease to be valid enactments when they come up against the federal undertaking.

It must always come down to an assessment, case by case, of what the impact would be of the provincial law on the federal undertaking.

However, a test has emerged over many years that says, in essence, provincial laws must give way and be rendered inoperative when they interfere with the core functioning of the federal undertaking.

The test of intrusiveness on the federal undertaking has been expressed many different ways in the cases.

The power to regulate trade and commerce does not, however, make a company engaged in trade and commerce and bound by some federal enactment in relation thereto a federal undertaking.

[31] It follows that operation of the appellant as a fish processor is not a federal undertaking.

There is nothing in the Constitution Act, apart from s. 91 (2), that could possibly make the appellant's operation a federal undertaking.

It is not such within the definition in the Canada Labour Code, and the power of Parliament to regulate trade and commerce, having been exercised in this case in the form of the Fish Inspection Act, does not make the appellant a federal undertaking for the purpose of that Act.

If it is found to be a federal undertaking, then the second question arises, namely whether the labour component of the appellant's operations forms an integral part of whatever it is that makes the undertaking of the appellant federal.

[22] The first question that arises here is whether the appellant is a federal undertaking as that term is defined in the Canada Labour Code.

Is the corner grocery store, being bound by that section, thereby a federal undertaking within the meaning of the Canada Labour Code?