Many Democrats see portability as the first step toward
federal vouchers for private schools and argue that it would siphon dollars from schools with high poverty and profound needs to those in more affluent neighborhoods.
Not exact matches
More than 700,000 students in more than 1,200 New York City
schools — including large high
schools in all five boroughs — would face higher class sizes, have fewer teachers and lose after -
school academic and enrichment programs if President - elect Trump makes good on a campaign promise to pull billions of
federal dollars away from public
schools to pay
for private vouchers, a UFT analysis has found.
Back in 2004, Spencer Hsu told the story of how the first
federal voucher program was launched, when George W. Bush signed legislation providing grants worth as much as $ 7,500 each to children from dozens of public
schools in the District of Columbia
for their use at
private or religious
schools in a five - year experiment.
The
federal tax credit proposal is one of several ideas under review by the White House to fulfill Donald Trump's campaign promise to promote the expansion of charter
schools and
vouchers that would allow families of low income to use public money
for private school tuition, sources tell POLITICO.
The
federal No Child Left Behind Act, which President George W. Bush signed into law last year, represented a victory
for the advocates of public
school choice: the law rejected funding
for private school vouchers, but did mandate that districts allow children in persistently failing
schools to transfer to public
schools that perform better.
«I can tell you this — if you gave the American people a choice today between using
federal dollars to renovate and build new public
schools or using public tax dollars to pay
for private school vouchers, there would be no question how the American people would vote,» asserted U.S. Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley in a speech made when the report was released.
Education lobbyists say HR 2086 would conceivably allow
school districts to use
federal dollars to pay
for vouchers for private school tuition or to pay
private companies to provide
school services.
Governor Romney has made the expansion of
school choice
for disadvantaged students central to his campaign, calling
for the expansion of the Washington, D.C.,
voucher program and
for allowing low - income and special education students to use
federal funds to enroll in
private schools.
While a lottery to select
voucher recipients chose first from among students in 15 D.C. public
schools that failed
for two years to meet goals under the
federal No Child Left Behind Act, about one in six D.C. children who will receive tuition grants are students who already attend
private school.
To opponents, the creation of a
federal program that pays
for children to attend
private schools can only foster the spread of
vouchers.
When combined with a
federal tax loophole that allows taxpayers to receive a
federal deduction on a dollar -
for - dollar state tax credit, 10 of these states» credits are so lucrative that they allow some upper - income taxpayers to turn a profit (at
federal taxpayer expense) on contributions they make to fund
private school vouchers.
The bill would give states the option of using the funds now distributed through a host of
federal programs — amounting to about $ 24 billion a year on the whole — as a single block grant to states
for public and
private school vouchers.
The death of a small
federal school - integration initiative is connected to a much larger concern that DeVos's primary education - reform idea — using public money
for private school vouchers — will produce poor academic results
for students, and Balkanize students by religion, race, and class.
«The end result is the same —
federal tax dollars going to
private schools,» said Sasha Pudelski, assistant director
for policy and advocacy at AASA, The
School Superintendents Association, who called the program «a backdoor
voucher.»
The
federal private school voucher program is an exemplar subject
for study because self - selection is assumed to be a major influence on whether or not a low - income urban student attends a
private school.
While the Administration appreciates that H.R. 471 would provide
Federal support
for improving public
schools in the District of Columbia (D.C.), including expanding and improving high - quality D.C. public charter
schools, the Administration opposes the creation or expansion of
private school voucher programs that are authorized by this bill.
With U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos at the helm of a
federal initiative to spread
private school choice even further, a new forum
for Education Next brings together experts to assess the research on these programs — a tax - credit - funded scholarship in Florida and
voucher programs in Indiana, Louisiana, and Ohio — and the implications
for whether and how states should design and oversee statewide choice programs.
These amendments included provisions requiring
private and parochial
schools accepting
vouchers to comply with state and
federal safety regulations; not to teach hatred of any person or group; to be fiscally solvent; and to conduct background checks
for school employees.
Since
private schools are not required to adhere to
federal or state requirements
for education, there may be inconsistencies that prohibit their ability to accept
vouchers.
A different picture is presented by
federal encouragement of charter
schools and of providing tuition
vouchers for private schools.
Fast forward to 2017: President Donald Trump and U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos have championed a plan to provide
federal funding
for private school voucher systems nationwide, which would funnel millions of taxpayer dollars out of public
schools and into unaccountable
private schools — a
school reform policy that they say would provide better options
for low - income students trapped in failing
schools.
The President's budget would cut
federal education programs across the board and use the money to spend about $ 400 million to expand charter
schools and
vouchers for private and religious
schools, and offer another $ 1 billion to push public
schools to favor charter and
private schools.
President Trump has proposed slashing $ 10.6 billion from
federal education initiatives, including after -
school programs, teacher training, and career and technical education, and reinvesting $ 1.4 billion of the savings into promoting his top education priority:
school choice, including $ 250 million
for vouchers to help students attend
private and religious
schools.
President Donald Trump offered one major K - 12 education proposal during the presidential campaign: a $ 20 billion plan that would reprioritize existing
federal education funds to provide
vouchers for private -
school choice.
Participating
private schools are required to accept the
voucher as full tuition
for students whose families are at or below 200 percent of the
federal poverty level.
Furthermore,
private schools receiving
vouchers are not accountable
for student performance and discipline practices, and are not always subject to
federal civil rights laws.
• Special education
vouchers will require districts to pay
private religious
schools $ 12,000
for students with special education needs;
private schools do not have to follow
federal requirements
for special ed students.
She added that
voucher programs
for private schools, which DeVos supports, have often failed students with disabilities —
private schools either aren't willing to serve them, or require them to waive their rights under
federal laws such as the ADA and the IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act).
The state Department of Public Instruction — which oversees the state's four
voucher programs — said Johnson's amendment would remove
federal oversight of the treatment of students who attend
private schools participating in the state's
voucher programs, including a new one specifically
for students with disabilities.
NSBA opposes
private school vouchers and urges Congress to reject using any
federal funds
for a national
voucher program, including any special education
vouchers for military children and / or specific subgroups of students.
During a congressional hearing in May, she refused to cite a single example of a time when she thought it was appropriate
for the
federal government to intervene in cases of discrimination by
private schools receiving
federal voucher funds.
The GI Bill, Pell Grants, student loans, both Presidents Bush, President Trump, the 25 states that allow parents to choose among public and
private schools, Congress with its passage of the Washington, D.C.
voucher program, 45 U.S. senators who voted in 2015 to allow states to use existing
federal dollars
for vouchers, Betsy DeVos — or her senate critics?
With both the House and Senate having passed their respective education bills, NSBA remains steadfast in working with lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to pass a final bill that restores community ownership to local
school boards, maximizes
federal funding
for Title I, and excludes
private vouchers, tuition tax credits, or existing
voucher programs.
Changes to family income eligibility — The measure drawing the most media attention calls
for raising the family income eligibility limits
for the statewide
private voucher program from 185 percent of the
federal poverty level to 220 percent, beginning in the 2018 - 19
school year.
At the same time, it seeks a historic $ 1.4 billlon
federal investment in
school choice, including new money
for private school vouchers and charter
schools, as well as directing $ 1 billion to follow students to the
school of their choice.
This substitute amendment requires, upon request of a parent or guardian, a
school board, or the governing body of an independent charter
school or a
private voucher school, to excuse a pupil enrolled in any grade from 3 to 12 from taking any examination required under state or
federal law, except
for an examination that is a high
school graduation requirement.
Scenario # 1: DeVos moves quickly to implement President - Elect Trump's plan to use $ 20 billion of
federal funds
for block grants to states to support
vouchers for poor children to attend
private schools.
Betsy DeVos has one mission at the Department of Education: to expand charter
schools and lead the establishment of a
federal voucher program — a program that would siphon public dollars meant
for our public
schools, and allow it to pad the pockets and budgets of
private schools and
private management companies.
For instance, the income cap is raised from 125 to 220 percent of the federal poverty level, and boosts funding for special needs vouchers — essentially issuing a blank check for private schools that receive those subsidi
For instance, the income cap is raised from 125 to 220 percent of the
federal poverty level, and boosts funding
for special needs vouchers — essentially issuing a blank check for private schools that receive those subsidi
for special needs
vouchers — essentially issuing a blank check
for private schools that receive those subsidi
for private schools that receive those subsidies.
ear after Maryland lawmakers created the state's first
private school voucher program, indications are that the state is gearing up
for big changes to address low - performing
schools as education officials work to draft a plan to comply with the
federal Every Student Succeeds Act.
President Donald Trump has proposed slashing $ 10.6 billion from
federal education initiatives, including after -
school programs, teacher training, and career and technical education, and reinvesting $ 1.4 billion of the savings into promoting his top education priority:
school choice, including $ 250 million
for vouchers to help students attend
private and religious
schools.
NSBA opposes
private school vouchers and urges Congress to reject using any
federal funds
for voucher programs, including any special education
vouchers for military children or specific subgroups of students.
In fact, in her responses to questions
for the record from Sen. Patty Murray (D - WA), she stated that it would be «misguided» to require
private schools to follow
federal law.7 Without a deep appreciation
for these laws, Trump and DeVos can not comprehend the protections they are asking parents to forfeit by participating in
voucher programs or the harm these programs pose to children with disabilities.