HALT's Report Card graded
fee arbitration systems in six categories: (1) whether lawyers are required to participate in binding arbitration at a client's request; (2) the ease of initiating arbitration; (3) the amount of state bar publicity of fee arbitration; (4) the program's reliance on non-lawyer arbitrators; (5) whether non-binding mediation is offered in addition to arbitration; and (6) how the system enforces awards.
The inherent bias of most
fee arbitration systems should be obvious: The vast majority of fee arbitrators are lawyers and, unless they are working pro bono, they are probably paid by the hour.
HALT hopes its Fee Arbitration Report Card will galvanize state bars and courts to take similar strides so that
the fee arbitration system lives up to its promise of conveniently and effectively resolving everyday fee disputes between lawyers and clients.
Not exact matches
While this is HALT's first report card on
fee arbitration, its previous Lawyer Discipline Report Cards conducted studies of the lawyer discipline
system that have led states to make critical improvements.
To shine a light on the out - of - court
systems designed to help clients conveniently settle bill conflicts with attorneys, HALT released its 2007
Fee Arbitration Report Card, ranking lawyer - client fee arbitration forums in all 50 states and the District of Columb
Fee Arbitration Report Card, ranking lawyer - client
fee arbitration forums in all 50 states and the District of Columb
fee arbitration forums in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.