Not exact matches
AC: I would say so and I guess if you really can't tell from our
discussion we were for it
because we think that the industry should be under the fiduciary standard and I think you will find that most
fee - only financial planners are all for it.
He'll look at a file and see what kind of value was added and adjust the
fee up or down depending, but «that's a little bit harder to do
because you don't have that upfront
discussion.»
I read this post 10 Big Reasons We Need to Reinvent the School Year from Online Colleges and it resonated with me
because of my research and recent article — Applying the Alternative
Fee Model to Law School Tuition, which has generated some additional
discussion.
For example, if both parties are, and have been, in therapy and are consistently communicating clearly with one another, a Coach may not be absolutely necessary (although I believe a Coach is almost always advisable
because it is impossible to predict exactly what may come up in the divorce
discussions and the clients will be triggered by what comes up) if the clients legitimately can not afford to cover the Coach's
fees.
In truth a cost of service
discussion that makes commission or
fees paramount is unprofessional,
because it's a superficial
discussion.
Constantly I hear Realtors say to me that
because of their BRA they require full
fees to be paid, and I guarantee that the majority did not have the honest and frank
discussion about listings offering less than traditional
fees.