Sentences with phrase «fee issues on appeal»

Not exact matches

I myself have about $ 48,000 in student loan debt, and about $ 30,000 in collection fees, my loans was the Alaska state student loans, I get harassing calls all the time, I have my Alaska PFD garnished, they took away my state pharmacy tech license so I could not work, they said if I brought my account up to par (several thousand dollars paid asap) I could get it re-instated with requests and appeals, they send me letters saying they are going to garnish my wages, seize bank accounts, and basically put me on the street, one of the representatives on the phone told me after I asked her what people do when they cant afford a $ 1500 monthly payment or more, she said «you need to get 2 - 3 jobs then now don't you» my credit is ruined, if I get a job I face garnishments and bank account seizures, I also have been in the process of filing for disability due to my medical issues, and just simply cant pay the debt, what can I do?

FIPO sought to appeal the CAT's judgment on a number of grounds including that the CAT had reached irrational conclusions on issues such as fee capping, top - up fees and consumer choice.

Unison issued further proceedings in October 2014 («Unison 2») and although the grounds of challenge overlapped with its earlier challenge in Unison 1, it was by this time able to rely on evidence based on statistics relating to the number of employment tribunal claims and appeals in the period of more than a year since fees were introduced.

Consistent with the Federal Court of Appeal's reluctance to review procedural actions of the Patent Office during prosecution once a patent has successfully issued, more recent decisions on fees further support the court's somewhat benevolent attitude in working to avoid invalidating applications and issued patents for what may be considered «technical violations».

In their appeal, AlphaCap Ventures» attorneys argue that the law of patent eligibility — particularly the law regarding when a claimed invention is an abstract idea and thus ineligible for patent protection — is so unsettled that a court should never award fees when a party loses on the issue.