I support creating a gradually rising
fee on all carbon fuels and then rebating the revenue in equal shares to every single resident of the nation's capital.
Not exact matches
The suggestion of a
carbon fee collected from fossil
fuel companies with all revenues distributed to the public
on a per capita basis [237] has received at least limited support [238].
In the video, Hansen doesn't discuss his preferred mechanism for propelling a shift away from fossil
fuels — a rising
fee on carbon - containing
fuels that is fully returned to citizens.
A steadily rising
fee on the production of fossil
fuels based
on the
carbon emissions that will be released when they are burned will raise the price of fossil
fuels, not all energy options.
The idea, proposed by Hansen, is simple: a
fee on carbon emissions collected from fossil -
fuel companies, with 100 percent of the money rebated to legal residents
on a per capita basis.
He also explains his idea of putting a
fee on carbon with dividend back to the people in order to cut back our dependence
on fossil
fuels.
The
fee would be placed
on carbon - based
fuels at the source, which is the coal mine, oil well, or U.S. border.
The most straightforward form of
carbon pricing is a
carbon tax, which, in its simplest version, imposes a
fee on every ton of
carbon that enters the economy («upstream,»
on fossil
fuel producers and importers, as opposed to «downstream,»
on fossil
fuel consumers).
People would pay a tax or a
fee on either the
carbon they emit or the fossil
fuels they purchase to incentivize lower usage as a way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The coalition has been urging the Council to introduce a more ambitious and timely
carbon «
fee - and - rebate» policy, which would put a
fee on fossil
fuel energy and re-invest the revenue into the D.C. community with rebates to residents and strategic investments in clean energy solutions.
Carbon fee - and - dividend would start with a
fee on fossil
fuels similar to a
carbon tax.
c. Only workable solution: rising across — the — board flat
fee on carbon, collected from fossil companies at point where fossil
fuel enters domestic market (domestic mine or port of entry).
Putting a price
on carbon, in the form of a
fee or tax
on the producers of fossil
fuels, can be an effective way to curb emissions of greenhouse gases.
A
carbon tax is a
fee imposed
on the burning of
carbon - based
fuels (coal, oil, gas).
The focus of CCL's lobbying efforts is a bill that will put a steadily - rising
fee on carbon - based
fuels and return the revenue to all households.
Citizens» Climate Lobby recommends a policy known as «
carbon fee and dividend,» — a steadily rising
fee is placed
on fuels based
on the amount of CO2 they will emit when burned.
In this system, a
fee is attached to fossil
fuel products based
on their associated
carbon emissions, and 100 percent of the revenue is returned to the citizens.
The transformation of our fossil
fuels - based energy system to reliance
on energy efficiency, renewable energy and sustainable
fuels won't happen fast enough without
carbon fees or taxes sending the appropriate persistent and rising price signals into every corner of the economy and every aspect of life.
This bill contains a cap - and - trade program
on greenhouse gas emissions by utilities and large industrial emitters, a
carbon fee on transportation
fuels, and a modest allocation of funds to energy efficiency.
With a
carbon fee - and - rebate policy called the Climate and Community Reinvestment Act of D.C., companies that buy and sell fossil
fuels in the District would pay a steadily - rising
fee on each ton of heat - trapping pollution they cause.
The rising
fee will be charged to the roughly 1,140 fossil
fuel producers via a simple line item
on their monthly / quarterly estimated tax filings, and the rising dividends will be distributed equally to every citizen regardless of how much
carbon they consume.
I can limit flood damage and improve health very simply: But I need lower cost energy (you don't want that), lower cost steel and transportation (you are working very hard to make both more expensive), more proper and safe rules and less excessive regulation (you want more regulation and more
fees and more interferences from very propagandized zealots against work), lower costs for electricity, water and
fuel (you seek more taxes and rules
on all) no government corruption (The
carbon taxes you want go ONLY to the corrupt third world dictators and NGO profit - seekers who are selling their ENRON - inspired
carbon credits, none do anything for the people of each country forced into squalor and death.)
It found that households in the top quintile would pay an
on average additional $ 319 per month, directly and indirectly, through higher fossil
fuel prices associated with the
carbon fee; that's more than three times the additional $ 96 per month that households in the lowest quintile would pay.
Hansen describes it as a «flat, across - the - board rising
fee on carbon emissions» that would be levied
on fossil
fuels at a domestic mine or port of entry.
A
fee - and - dividend system imposes a
fee on the initial sale of a fossil
fuel which is then redistributed to the public; the rising cost of
carbon - intensive products would, it is hoped, encourage families to keep their
carbon footprints low.