For full details of
our fee share arrangements, please contact us.
Not exact matches
And finally, we continue to make progress moving to a
fee - based pricing model with a more equitable risk -
sharing arrangement.
«Mr. Runes and Mr. Dorego then engaged in discussions in which they, too, expressed deep concern about the defendant's receipt of a
share of
fees from Glenwood, and the fear of adverse consequences should Glenwood refuse to consent to the
arrangement,» the filing states.
Runes said Litwin personally made the decision to remove Silver's name form a public document that would have disclosed the
fee -
sharing arrangement.
The lobbyist, Richard Runes, testified that Silver's name was removed from a public document that would have disclosed the
fee -
sharing arrangement by firm CEO Leonard Litwin.
A letter disclosing the referral -
fee arrangement between Sheldon Silver and a law firm to which he directed a lucrative developer client was
shared with a politically connected top executive of that client but not with its chief financial officer, the officer testified in the former Assembly speaker's corruption trial.
He says the ride
sharing companies should perhaps be required to help pay for the upkeep of roads and bridges, in an
arrangement similar to New York City, where taxi cab companies pay a
fee towards public transit.
A letter disclosing the referral -
fee arrangement between Sheldon Silver and a law firm to which he directed a lucrative developer client was
shared with a politically connected top executive of that client but not with its chief financial officer, the officer testified on Thursday.
Lawmakers, mainly Republicans, have made progress in scaling back collective bargaining rights, «fair
share»
fee arrangements, and automatic deduction of dues from members» paychecks.
If Rights Holder and Producer have agreed to a royalty
share arrangement, Rights Holder must pay Producer a cancellation
fee equal to $ $ 100 base plus $ 100 per finished hour times the projected number of finished hours (in 10 minute increments) in the Deal Confirmation Page; up to a maximum of $ 2,500.
However, we do believe that annual reports should include a breakout of total commissions paid, average commissions per
share, and disclosure about soft - dollar
arrangements, trailing
fees and other costs borne by shareholders (at present, this is considered «non-standard information»).
Revenue -
sharing agreements are
arrangements in which a mutual fund family pays the brokerage firm extra
fees or commissions for selling their product.
Each
share class represents an interest in the same assets of the Funds, has the same rights and is identical in all material respects except that (i) each class of
shares may be subject to different (or no) sales loads, (ii) each class of
shares may bear different (or no) distribution
fees; (iii) each class of
shares may have different shareholder features, such as minimum investment amounts; (iv) certain other class - specific expenses will be borne solely by the class to which such expenses are attributable, including transfer agent
fees attributable to a specific class of
shares, printing and postage expenses related to preparing and distributing materials to current shareholders of a specific class, registration
fees paid by a specific class of
shares, the expenses of administrative personnel and services required to support the shareholders of a specific class, litigation or other legal expenses relating to a class of
shares, Trustees»
fees or expenses paid as a result of issues relating to a specific class of
shares and accounting
fees and expenses relating to a specific class of
shares and (v) each class has exclusive voting rights with respect to matters relating to its own distribution
arrangements.
Some commentators and readers expressed concern that this
arrangement could constitute inappropriate
fee sharing.
In a post titled, Disbar the Connecticut 5, he argues that the lawyers»
arrangement with Total Attorneys was
fee sharing, plain and simple, and that they should not have been surprised to find themselves the subject of a disciplinary action.
This trend will accelerate as fixed
fees and other risk
sharing alternative
fee arrangements spread.
We'd like to invite corporate counsel and their law firm counterparts to
share their views on the subject of alternative
fee arrangements and answer these questions.
Virtually office
arrangements are very similar to traditional
shared office rentals; the main difference is the unbundled
fees.
After my first post about this new service, some commentators and readers expressed concern that this
arrangement could constitute inappropriate
fee sharing.
[1] This Rule codifies the proposition that LLLTs may enter into
fee -
sharing arrangements and for - profit business relationships with lawyers.
Alternative
fee arrangements are a way of
sharing that risk.»
Pat leads Valorem's efforts to provide
fee arrangements where risk is actually
shared and where outcomes determine the
fees, not the time to secure the outcomes.
And in this case, where the modest damages and 95 % of the huge costs will be borne presumably by the management company (unless their solicitors ran the defence on a conditional
fee arrangement), the claimant will theoretically end up paying a percentage of the costs award herself out of her
share of the management fund, added to which inter-lessee relations will hardly have been improved by this appreciable charge to the fund to which all must contribute.
«We will also be organizing a conference about solutions, about how can we bill our clients differently, how we can
share the risk, how we can increase predictability... and bring tools for lawyers to be able to evaluate fixed -
fee arrangements.»
South Carolina found that this
arrangement violates Rule 5.4 (a) of the South Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, which says that a «lawyer or law firm shall not
share legal
fees with a nonlawyer.»
However, solicitors prefer being paid on a restricted basis, entering into a fixed (30 % of total responses ranked by preference), or capped
fee arrangement (23 %), over risk sharing with clients through a Conditional Fee Arrangement (20 %) or Damages Based Agreement (12
fee arrangement (23 %), over risk sharing with clients through a Conditional Fee Arrangement (20 %) or Damages Based Agreem
arrangement (23 %), over risk
sharing with clients through a Conditional
Fee Arrangement (20 %) or Damages Based Agreement (12
Fee Arrangement (20 %) or Damages Based Agreem
Arrangement (20 %) or Damages Based Agreement (12 %).
Virginia explicitly held that the substance of the
arrangement trumps its form, and a lawyer paying the platform, with that amount having any relation to the amount of the legal
fee, constitutes unethical
fee sharing.
This market
share shift is reinforced by the findings associated with law firm consolidation and alternative
fee arrangements (AFAs) described later in this report.
My suggestion would be to adopt the kind of approach laid out by John F. Brown Jr. in a law.com article about risk -
sharing fee arrangements published last New Year's Eve.
Major UK international law firms — such as Linklaters, Clifford Chance, Allen & Overy and Herbert Smith — have been offering clients fixed
fee, caped
fee and risk
sharing options for over a decade [White & Case built a reputation on fixed
fee arrangements in Asia post 1997].
The court's decision thus neutralizes many of the benefits of the fixed
fee, including administrative ease and
shared risk (presumably, if one of the trigger events for withdrawal of the
fee does not occur, the lawyer must refund the
fee, which is not the case with a standard flat
fee arrangement).
A typical attorney who self - identifies as an «employee rights» attorney will usually have much more experience (as compared to the typical attorney identified as an «employment attorney» or an «employer defense» attorney) with: (1) representing workers on a contingency -
fee basis (where no
fee is paid unless the case wins or settles) and offering risk -
sharing fee arrangements generally; (2) playing offense, so to speak — analyzing, identifying and prosecuting specific legal violations (whereas employer - side attorneys tend to have more experience in broader - stroke compliance / employer - training matters, and reactive work in litigation that responds to claims they are presented); and (3) identifying with the «little guy» who has been harmed by a larger opponent, often having well - tested strategies that have worked while representing individuals against large organizations and wind up with good case results.
Co-payment is a fixed payment (
fee) for certain medical services, such as doctor visits, hospital admissions, therapy sessions, etc, required by an insurer as a cost
sharing arrangement.