Sentences with phrase «feedback mechanisms so»

Create confidential, impartial, and accessible feedback mechanisms so that research students have no fear of raising complaints regarding their supervision.

So if you don't completely empty your breast and you accept that feedback mechanism so it's just, there's a glitch in that.

But even with all those flaws, earnings estimates provided useful function in being a feedback mechanism so that the market knows how to react in general, when earnings are released.

Then again, they may not CALL it feedback because, for example, H2O is known to be a feedback mechanism so it would be redundant to call it such.

Not exact matches

All processes need regular updates, so a non-punitive feedback mechanism is important.

My point is that such defeat should serve as a learning process so we can move forward; or else we risk of not having a healthy feedback mechanism like Arsenal.

It's a feedback mechanism that's how just milk supply in general your body gets the message from baby to make milk and so, it's believed that this thing called the feedback inhibitor of lactation which controls milk supply has some kind of relationship tied in to emptying and filling a breast.

The UK's Higher Education Funding Councils are working to improve the standards in research degree programmes so that standards for training, supervision arrangements, feedback mechanisms, and induction are brought in to help overcome the most serious problems faced by research students.

But at the same time he'd like to put «more onus on society» and says that we «need better feedback mechanisms» so that the public can engage in the debate.

Similarly, the mechanism that controls how isocitrate is used responds to negative feedback, and so it dampens «noise» to maintain optimal levels.»

Hard robots require a sophisticated feedback mechanism to help them determine how much force to apply during surgery so they do not damage our delicate tissues and organs.

Slow insolation changes initiated the climate oscillations, but the mechanisms that caused the climate changes to be so large were two powerful amplifying feedbacks: the planet's surface albedo (its reflectivity, literally its whiteness) and atmospheric CO2 amount.

So then, how do we avoid getting swept up the vast array of marking and feedback strategies that provide quirky mechanisms to capture and deliver feedback and drill down to what underpins it all in the first place?

The known negative feedback mechanisms can reduce the warming, but they do not appear to be so strong as the positive moisture feedback.

Being a green, enviro conscious type, I believe this is generally true, but my fear is that the recessionary feedback mechanism is so long, convoluted and abstract, that the average US citizen, when confronted with recessionary conditions, higher fuel and capital costs, can not or will not always act in his best interest, or the best interests of the US.

Now we have a couple of mechanisms that seem realistic for several specific types of changes such as the cloud height feedback, and we have some observational confirmation of a general latitudinal pattern of feedbacks that many models seem to get, more so than was the case a decade ago.

Results of previously published empirical studies are used to demonstrate that the water vapor feedback mechanism, so important to the calculation of a significant climatic effect for a doubling of the atmospheric CO2 concentration, appears to be counter-balanced by another feedback mechanism of opposite sign.

Kukla rightly noted that the «change in the heat income due to Milankovitch mechanism is so minute that it can not lead directly to glaciation or deglaciation... Only when multiplied by some efficient feedback mechanism can the insolation trigger climatic change».

Even worse, it is actually misleading to say the world is heading for 3.5 °C of warming, or 3.0 °C or 4.0 °C, because to do so gives the impression that we can set the global thermostat at a certain temperature, whereas beyond a certain amount of warming (maybe 2.0 °C although scientists do not really know) feedback mechanisms will be set in train that will amplify human - induced warming and take the Earth to a warmer, perhaps much warmer, state.

Slow insolation changes initiated the climate oscillations, but the mechanisms that caused the climate changes to be so large were two powerful amplifying feedbacks: the planet's surface albedo (its reflectivity, literally its whiteness) and atmospheric CO2 amount.

Another example is the so - called feedback mechanisms, which are introduced to amplify an effect which is not marginal but does not exist at all.

But we know that the mechanisms responsible for the variation of Ts are different in internal variability on these time scales and in forced climate change, then my questions is that: is it possible that the spread in ECS might not be so directly caused by low - cloud feedback, although the low cloud feedback is a very good indictor for the model uncertainty?

Another mechanism for positive feedback: Atmospheric CO2 increases (due to burning of fossil fuels), so the enhanced greenhouse effect heats up the planet.

However, the precise processes and feedback mechanisms have not yet been fully understood, so that the interaction between aerosol particles, their suitability as cloud condensation nuclei, and the sunlight reflected off the earth's surface represented one of the greatest uncertainties in the calculation of climatic activity.

There is, so far as we know, no feedback mechanism of a dimmer stratosphere that causes more volcanic eruptions.

If this is natural, so if a «warming regime» (the word choice may indicate bias, by the way) is changed unforced into a cooling regime you may very have proven that a positive feedback mechanism due to water vapor is impossible.

For example, the argument that follows very substantially from the extent of continental shelf that there is within the Arctic Basin and, therefore, the particular relationship that warming on that relatively shallow sea has on trapped methane - for example, the emergence of methane plumes in that continental shelf, apparently in quite an anomalous way - leading possibly to the idea that there may be either tipping points there or catastrophic feedback mechanisms there, which could then have other effects on things, such as more stabilised caps like the Greenland ice cap and so on.

Water vapor is a far more powerful greenhouse gas than CO2, so its potential strength as a feedback mechanism is high.

So the human forcing and related global positive feedbacks continue to over-ride the much weaker cooling mechanism.