Sentences with phrase «feeding bans»

Other efforts, like feeding bans or laws regulating cat owners, have also failed to make any difference.

See our tips on how you can stop feeding bans.

Feeding bans do not work, and are not scientifically supported.

Feeding bans encourage cats to roam further to find food, making them more visible, which can actually increase calls to animal control.

In both cases, be sure you share information on why feeding bans are cruel and ineffective, and the benefits of Trap - Neuter - Return.

Feeding bans ignore the real problem — the lack of affordable spay / neuter services in the community.

[CITY / COUNTY»S] proposed feeding ban for outdoor cats has already been tried in other communities and it has never worked.

Feeding bans punish the very people who are working to improve conditions for the cats and for the community.

Feeding bans undermine the only successful method of addressing the community cat (also known as feral cat) population: Trap - Neuter - Return (TNR).

Alley Cat Allies opposes feeding bans for feral cats.

Feeding bans discourage the practice of Trap - Neuter - Return, the only effective course of action for stabilizing the feral cat population.

Feeding bans force their work into secrecy.

Feeding ban laws, ordinances, and policies are misguided policy and are wholly ineffective.

Starving cats through feeding bans is cruel, ineffective in managing the population, and often increases calls to animal control when cats become more visible scavenging for food.

Punitive ordinances like feeding bans waste taxpayer dollars and penalize outdoor cat caregivers who are Good Samaritans making the community a better place for cats and people.

I just wanted him to explain how feeding bans and policy directives opposing TNR would, as ABC suggests in its November 9 media release, «stop the spread of feral cats.»

In Antioch, California, a 2014 feeding ban proved futile.

Equally important, feeding bans jeopardize the ongoing sterilization and vaccination services provided by caregivers who diligently maintain and monitor cat colonies in the community.

A recent news item from Alley Cat Allies reports «a disturbing and increasing trend of feeding ban proposals as a way to «eradicate» cats from their outdoor homes.»

San Jose Animal Care & Services Director Jon Cicirelli, who lectures on feral cats, said cats don't usually form colonies unless they're fed by people, but that history has shown feeding bans are unenforceable.

Impractical ordinances like feeding bans and pet limit laws punish the very people who, at their own expense, are working to improve conditions for both cats and the community.

Feeding bans do not allow TNR to be carried out.

Further, even if the TNR practitioner is not deemed an owner, feeding bans, nuisance laws and laws prohibiting abandonment may subject TNR participants to civil and / or criminal prosecution or potential liability to third parties.

Feeding bans are cruel and ineffective and won't achieve what the authority issuing them wants.

With a feeding ban in place, TNR is impossible to carry out.

Feeding bans are difficult to enforce; compassionate people will continue to help the cats.

We understand that some of you are continuing to feed cats even with a feeding ban in place, risking fines.

Feeding bans will not decrease the community cat population because community cats do not depend on people feeding them to survive.

To stop the feeding ban and protect the community cats you care for, you'll need to advocate on their behalf.

With a feeding ban in place, Trap - Neuter - Return is impossible to carry out, and the cats continue to have new litters of kittens.

Cats won't simply go away when a feeding ban is in place.

If the feeding ban was issued by property management, see our information on Conflicts with Property Management.

Feeding bans are punitive and tend to direct resources towards administrative tasks like enforcement and away from incentive - based programs that encourage spay / neuter.

Ineffective ordinances, like feeding bans, are a waste of taxpayer dollars.

If the feeding ban was issued by law enforcement, the city council, the mayor, or another municipal leader, these resources will help:

If a feeding ban is issued and you choose to keep feeding the cats anyways, know your rights and how to respond if you receive a citation.

Ill - conceived ordinances like feeding bans and limit laws punish the very people who, at their own expense, are working to improve conditions for both cats and community.

Ultimately, a feeding ban will result in cats roaming farther to find food and digging through people's trash.

[CITY / COUNTY] doesn't need to implement a feeding ban — it needs to follow a responsible path for its cats.

Why they harm cats: feeding bans are ineffective, lack scientific support, are inherently cruel, and do not come close to achieving their intended goals.

Trying to simply remove feral cats from their territory — whether to trap and kill, euthanize, feeding bans, rescue, relocation to another site or place in a sanctuary — does not end up lowering the number of feral cats.

Second, feeding bans are nearly impossible to enforce.

Why, then, does anybody even remotely familiar with this topic think a feeding ban would reduce the number of unowned, free - roaming cats?

Equally important, well - crafted legislation will insulate community cats from licensing requirements, feeding bans, pet limits or other punitive laws that often impede the progress of sterilization efforts and public health protection.

Feeding bans are notoriously ineffective primarily because they are impossible to enforce.

This legislation also exempts community cats from licensing requirements and feeding bans, providing yet another level of legal protection to the good Samaritans who care for them.

It certainly appears that this zero tolerance policy and feeding ban has not worked.

Such a cat is exempt from licensing requirements and feeding bans.

Feeding bans are difficult to enforce and are ineffective at decreasing cat populations.