Sentences with phrase «feel about your actions»

«Whatever anyone feels about the action itself, the sentence of six weeks in prison for throwing a foam pie is absurdly harsh.

Not exact matches

Three years ago Druckenmiller was negative about U.S. and Chinese actions, yet he still felt asset prices could be driven higher.

«I never base my actions on how people will feel about it or whether I'd take any criticism,» he said, while speaking at the Fortune Global Forum Conference in Guangzhou, China, on Wednesday.

Instead, talk about the implications of their actions indirectly by discussing the impact the problem has had on you, your feelings, or the business.

They don't feel bad for people they've wronged, and they don't feel guilty about any of the negative actions they've taken.

To give you an example, when I was 16 years old and felt all hope was lost, it wasn't until I got extremely clear about getting a college scholarship for football that my daily actions and behaviors started to change.

Customers who believe companies take action based on the feedback feel better about the company and are more likely to respond to surveys.

«We are at the right place and I feel good about our ability to turn Bombardier around given these actions.»

Writing about the recent FASB and SEC actions, Dayen quoted SEC Investor Advisory Committee (IAC) member Damon Silvers, who expressed the view that «The feeling of this body [IAC] is that more disclosure is better than less in general.

Thinking about the future tends to get most of us excited, we get that feeling of «what could be» and it spurs us to action to make our future vision a reality.

Turning to investment managers and their non-reaction to the threat he feels Fed action poses, Rodriguez then said they «do not appear particularly concerned with, [or] worried about, the finer nuances of an academic debate between two different schools of economic thought.

This isn't intended to make you feel worse about your approach thus far to business, it's meant to wake you up so you can start taking some real action.

I wonder how Kurt feels about that tweet now (and his actions).

By demonstrating that you are trustworthy through the actions above, you can make people relax and feel safer about taking part.

Both want to take something that has established laws governing the line between legal and criminal actions and throw away any reason in the name of «how some feel about it».

Think about it — you feel the need to rush in here and attack what was a noble action, whether you agree with the motivation or not.

In human relationships we evaluate how others feel about us based on their actions towards us.

I guess Kimster is just feeling guilty about his / her own lack of charity and compassion — Sucks to be you, but don't blame your lack of action on those who actually do good thing with their time and money.

I'll start: I feel most at home in a church that 1) takes its mission to care for the poor and marginalized seriously, 2) does not make assumptions about its congregation's political positions nor emphasizes political action to begin with, 3) speaks of Scripture in terms of its ability to «equip us for every good work,» 4) embraces diversity (theologically, ethnically, etc.) and allows women to assume leadership positions.

Think about the experience of Love which you can not put under a microscope but one can feel it and display it through one's actions.

Everyone has a voice in their head to incline them to feel love towards a person (to perform actions that show love), but a lot of people ignore that voice and even block it out (except for the people they specifically care about).

One of the most useful ways of doing this is by what psychotherapists call taking an «I» position — «making clear statements about your own thoughts, feelings, and actions without using others to explain the way you are.»

Not only is it important to know about one's own faith but I feel you must also know about others as these influence the actions of those around you and therefore many of the policies made by governments around the world - many of the policies being unjust!

To me it feels like those in power should be held to this kind of treatment because their actions have the most drastic consequences, but sometimes I scare myself with the things I think about them.

We do know that after Eve ate she gave to her husband and (while under the deception of this action being most profitable)(and with no mention about her eyes being opened and her knowing she was naked and feeling shameful) just that she gave to her man.

Considering everyone is a sinner, if you don't feel guilty about your actions from time to time you simply are not acknowledging your own sinfulness.

God accepts whatever we bring to the God / person relationship — our physical and spiritual condition, personality, connection to reality, our participation in relationships, talents, inabilities, cognition, knowledge, ignorance, life journey, spiritual journey, walk about, wandering, seeking, questioning, questing, acceptance of God, rejection of God — and our emotional and mental status: hate / love, anger / peace, sadness / happiness, hurt / health, feeling lost and abandoned / feeling found and included, agitation / serenity, apathy / passion, confusion / clarity, fractures / wholeness — all of this, all of whoever we are and have ever been and every action committed or ever contemplated and every thought we ever explored or entertained or that flitted through our mind — all of this, we bring to the God / person relationship and God accepts the totality of who we are and every component that comprises who we are — as a gift.

What gets a lot of people upset about this case (and I feel that the judge erred) was with his lecture, which came across as heavy handed and justifying the accused actions.

Amazing how this picture can be more about the perception felt by the little one, versus the actions or intentions of the bigger ones; how many pastors / (c) hurches deal with this on the level of seeing what's actually there versus what they perceive.

He loves to be in open and honest communication with us about what we think and feel regarding His actions.

We talk about what they did and try and relate it to being a «good person» or allegorize it somehow to make ourselves feel good, but the fact remains that these disciples were men of action and a threat to the established order of things.

If I ask myself whether, on fuller reflection about my reason for feeling this way, my sense of obligation may cease to attach itself to the nonperformance of the action in question, I incline strongly to the negative view, and I find it difficult to believe that at this point other rational beings differ from me.

During the past forty years, voters have been taught by TV to make political judgments based on how they feel about a particular candidate, rather than how to evaluate a candidate's actual positions and actions.

«I do not want to put my family, those that I care about, or this state through what would be a very ugly campaign that would ultimately cause a great deal more pain than has already been felt as a result of my actions.

I thought about it almost every other day, felt guilty, but didn't quite take the time to translate that to action.

Of course it would be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has been for this club... I'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real change would finally come... I resent this team for even making me feel such thoughts and it's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game because we don't have faith in those in charge to make the necessary changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and make unrealistic claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it's not your fault, both sides are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have been percolating for several years... it's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we are trapped by the same catch - 22 that ManU faced upon Fergie's exit... less fearful of maintaining the status quo than facing the unknown, which was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced during this transitory period... to be honest, the thing that scares me most is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which considering our frugal nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players is more than a little disconcerting

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

And while I don't necessarily think this is the appropriate course of action, it certainly made me feel a bit better about all of that.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

But with all four teams immediately behind ASU in action today, the Sun Devils shouldn't feel confident about selection.

They are securing benefits that they believe they would lose if they were to be honest about their feelings and actions.

If you've read this blog for a while, you know how I feel about keeping a marriage intact — it only matters if both partners believe the marriage is worth keeping intact and then actually act that way (yeah, you actually have to follow it up with action).

No matter how deeply I was hurt by their words or actions, it felt like to my mother, whatever angst had caused my brother or sister's actions was more important than how I felt about it.

If fact, most parents do it without even realizing that their words and actions have great impact on how their child or teenager feels about himself.

It felt so much better to not feel alone, and also to think about potential courses of action.

Whatever you're feeling guilty about, I encourage you to take a moment or two of quiet today to process what parts of the guilt could be helpful - to fuel new decisions, motivate new actions, or help others - and to filter out what parts of the guilt are unnecessary self - criticism and unhelpful repeated thoughts.

«Children need to feel that they can trust their parents, that they can talk to them about what is happening in their lives,» says Edward F. Dragan, author of The Bully Action Guide: How to Help Your Child and Get Your School to Listen.

Your well - meaning spouse or grandparent may be feeling anxious about all the crying, want to quickly stop it and may use words or actions to discourage your efforts.

If he is feedings more than eight to 12 times a day and anything else about his behavior is worrying you I feel like the best cause of action is to see an experienced International Board Certified Lactation Consultant to help determine what is going on and whether it's just a variation of normal.

Its all about not hurting the other midwives feelings, and you aren't allowed to discuss any illegal actions or misconduct.