Because of this, the movie has the look and
feel of the other movies, even though James Wan isn't directing this time around.
Not exact matches
Meanwhile, Leigh, who spends a majority
of the
movie covered in blood like some outlaw version
of Carrie, sometimes
feels like the villain and
other times like the hero.
And they pull it off without having to give away the
movies storyline or talk about everyone's resume and do a bunch
of other boring things we
feel like we've seen a million times now that crowd funding has been around for a while.
Mead offers a less compassionate portrayal
of a freelance, multifaith minister who offers brides and grooms a smorgasbord
of options for ceremonies, including the fabled «Apache Indian Prayer» («Now you will
feel no rain / For each
of you will be shelter to the
other»)-- which originates not from Apache tradition but from a
movie starring Jimmy Stewart — and a ceremony she concocted in which the bride and groom dab honey on each
other's tongues.
web site, including but not limited to the graphics, text, audio, images, pictures, icons,
movies, video, layout, and look and
feel of the site is protected by copyrights, trademarks, service marks, and / or
other proprietary rights under the laws
of the U.S. and
other countries.
The first time I stepped into Ferrara Pan Fitness Factory I
felt like I was walking into a state -
of - the - art «Rocky»
movie, only there were women, kids and professional athletes co-mingling and learning along side each
other.
«It was almost as if they were a part
of the
movie —
feeling touch, pain and
other physical sensations that the characters were experiencing.»
«I guess I must be, because this film represents a lot
of ideas and
feelings I have as an artist,» he said, going on to highlight his
movie's «environmental message and the idea that we are all connected to each
other as human beings.»
The script is a mess and it
feels like it's two different
movies, where one is interesting and the
other one is a waste
of time.
Like ever
other movie in the M: I series, the story demands your unedified attention at every beat, and one can't help but
feel that some
of the countless twists are frivolous considering the basic framework
of the narrative.
The film lacks any kind
of real «action», which makes it a departure from Mann's
other work like Heat or Last
of the Mohicans, but it still
feels like an action
movie because
of the aggressive way in which Mann directs it.
Critics Consensus: Great visuals, but the story
feels like a cut - and - paste job
of other sci - fi
movies.
Critic Consensus: Great visuals, but the story
feels like a cut - and - paste job
of other sci - fi
movies.
true love and
feelings of other wld definetly love this
movie...
For all its sincere intentions, Kruishoop's script
feels cobbled together from newspaper headlines and bits
of other movies rather than real, lived experience.
Good: Starscream is a lot cooler in this
movie, Best computer - graphics for any
movie to date, Original Optimus voice, Bumblebee vs. Barricade scene was awesome, Decent story, but the Unicron story is a million times better Bad: No Hot Rod or Soundwave, Shia LeBeouf, Ending, Futile attempts to connect to classic scenes, lines and concepts, No Stan Bush soundtrack, Some immature humor ruined a lot
of the
movie for me, Poor dialogue I really expected a lot from this
movie and am very critical about my
feelings towards it - Overall Michael Bay made a good
movie, but he made it appeal to the masses (immature jokes and a lot
of action) and it gave up a lot
of other crucial aspects to the story and quality
of the Transformers franchise.
I wonder if Lawrence
felt similarly indebted to her Hunger Games director Francis Lawrence to make this
movie, which seems to exist for little purpose
other than to show her naked in as many ways as contractually obligable, the result being a sort
of Soviet fetish pin - up calendar.
However, the originality issues at the core
of the first season, and the amateurish enthusiasm for
other movies (something that
felt more «Birdemic» than «Scream») were gone.
Indeed, the non-Marvel films in these franchises that have done best more recently are the ones that stood out from the crowd, like Wonder Woman (which rejected the dark tone
of other DC
movies), Logan (which
felt like a grown - up standalone film), and Deadpool (which loudly razzed the idea
of being linked to X-Men
movies).
In
other words, Black Panther is a sort
of «
feel - good»
movie, «refreshing» because it focuses on the exploits
of a monarch and his retinue and ignores the riff - raff below.
Cruise's performance
feels like his performance in any
of his
other movies - he's the suave doll we expect him to be, and we
feel like we've seen it all before.
Watching the
movie feels as if you've sat down in someone's living room to hear tales
of other legendary jazz musicians, such as Count Basie or Miles Davis.
There are powerful moments in «Unbroken,» to be sure, but it also
feels like the kind
of generically grand - scale
movie that five
other directors could have made in exactly the same way.
The
movie's goal is to be a distraction from life but not to engross, to escape
other thoughts and
feelings but not to introduce any new ones, something to kill time with as you watch the plastic characters go through the motions
of the soulless soap opera like plot.
The first hour
of the
movie is virtually unwatchable, with Braff oddly sprinkling in fantasy sci - fi sequences that are supposed to convey the character's inner - life, but never really add anything to the film
other than make it
feel alternately goofy and pretentious.
Some people says videogames are as much art as
movies, those people are idiots, videogames are better than
movies, Videogames can express art in another dimension, and monster hunter tri expands that dimension to the point
of let you even wonder what a hunter is, what a monster is, it makes you forget you are playing, it instead makes you
feel you are really chasing monsters and risking your life, you can cry with this game like with no
other, heavy rain?
The
movie's goal is to be a distraction from life but not to engross, to escape
other thoughts and
feelings but not to introduce any new ones, something to kill time with as you watch the plastic characters go through the motions
of
The editing doesn't quite
feel as sharp as
other Tarantino films - almost certainly due to the unfortunate loss
of his former editor Sally Menke in 2010 - but editor Fred Raskin must be doing something right, making this nearly three - hour
movie feel like it runs half the length.
But Last Days works only when it deviates from this pattern, as it does in a hilarious scene depicting the rock star's friendly yet indifferent agreement to buy space in the yellow pages from a clueless door - to - door salesman (Thadeus A. Thomas, the
movie's only perfectly cast actor), or when it focuses on
other members
of Blake's entourage, or when the camera retreats at a snail's pace from the mansion for what
feels like eternity.
For some, it will be very bad news that Ritchie (who co-wrote King Arthur: The Legend
of the Sword with Joby Harold and Lionel Wigram) stays in his lane with this film; if you didn't enjoy the look and pace and overall vibe
of other Ritchie
movies, such as Snatch or Sherlock Holmes, then you might
feel that his often jarring and visually exhausting style could overpower the strong performances from a great cast.
Stone covers a lot
of ground without turning it into a three or four hour opus like some
of his
other movies tend to
feel like.
One
of the many reasons why this
movie works so well and sets it apart from
others in this genre is the very realistic approach and
feel it has to telling this story.
Nothing is off the table in this daringly unique exploration
of what makes us tick and for a
movie that stars a corpse, few
other features
felt as warm and alive this year.
Also, the story is able to draw on both Christian and traditionally Korean shamanistic traditions and combine them with the history
of Japanese colonialism to create its morbid atmosphere, which has the ability to chill even without a belief in any
of its superstitions.4 That said, the bludgeoning nature
of the approach kept the
movie from achieving the masterpiece status many
other critics have assigned it.5 By contrast, Park Chan - wook's latest, Agassi (The Handmaiden), has received a mixed reception, but I
feel it is his best since 2003's Oldboy.6
The «Star Wars» fandom will be enthralled by most
of «Rogue One», but for me, this was a tough
movie to get through — and
others who aren't emotionally invested in the franchise may
feel the same way.
Riley Keough
feels especially shortchanged as the most haunted
of Thomas's followers, and Jesse Plemons, as Thomas's
other, less confrontational son,
feels like he's mainly there to goose the plot along rather than to expand the
movie's ideas.
Unlike
other movies in similar genres, the war scenes never
feel gratuitous or extravagant for the sake
of showing off.
In the
movie's early scenes, the queasy
feeling that these two don't even like each
other is so palpable it leaves a residue
of sourness that extends through the rest
of the film.
New director David Leitch sticks to the formula
of raunchy humor and low blows to
other superhero
movies for a film that succeeds in
feeling new and hilarious enough to keep this franchise going.
And Rebecca Ferguson and Keala Settle, playing songbirds
of distinctly different class strata and mustache capacity, make the most
of their supporting roles; in two
of the
movie's best scenes, each explores the psychic pain
of a lifetime spent
feeling like the
Other in almost every room they enter.
Unfortunately, even though
of course we recognize the bravery and selfless heroism
of the men on that train who risked their lives to save
others, and even though there are a few pulse - quickening moments in «The 15:17 to Paris,» the
movie is slow - paced and
feels padded, even with that running time
of just over an hour and a half.
That doesn't bug me with Iron Man becuase that is Tony Stark in a nutshell, but otherwise there's not a whole lot
of other superhero
movies where it
feels like anyone actually gives much
of a shit about each
other.
As a result, the
movie feels cinematic at times and downright cartoonish at
others but
of course the dazzling 1950s animation is never even challenged, let alone rivaled.
So, it
felt like we were all finding our footing on the first
movie and getting to know each
other and what kind
of story we wanted to tell in our version
of Spider - Man.
I truly can not think
of a
movie that I've seen that was so blatantly torn to shreds in post-production in the editing room, to a point where it
feels like no single scene belongs in the same
movie as any
other one, and that no one working on the film even realized they were working on the same one as all
of these
other people involved.
Other movies just don't look like Merchant Ivory
movies, they don't move like them or
feel like them, and that's because
of the tremendous care Ivory spent on them.
It's baffling that Affleck continues to play the least interesting character in
movies he chooses to direct, and yet throughout Live by Night, he's surrounded by
other characters that
feel far more deserving
of our attention.
I wasn't too surprised to be let down but this
movie, it was actually worst than the first and that was a bad
movie, the second on the
other hand has more
of a story and
feels like a genuinely longer
movie (as well as more closer to the 2nd / 3d game plot).
He's one
of the greats, so for me, it's a privilege to have him on the
movie and to give him sequences, and like Daniel says, you're making four
movies and every section
of the film
feels so distinct from the
other,
feels so alive, it kind
of regenerates in front
of your eyes really, the film.
Even if the story is derivative, much
of that old detective
feel has been excised for a more modern approach in the
movie adaptation, leaving it virtually indistinguishable from many
other films in current release.