So
our feelings about authorship are much less of an issue, or at least we feel that we are always under construction and not some singular fixed being.
... but it is also my understanding that whatever
the feeling about authorship is, it doesn't remove the fact that is: if someone calls themselves an «Author», then, fine.
Not exact matches
So, Salero21, you were going to tell me
about the
authorship of the gospels when you got sidetracked here and by your queasy
feeling about «ho - mos» above.
Students
felt strongly connected to their drawings, and this led to a passionate discussion
about authorship.
For you,
authorship must not be
about making money or selling books; writing books or this particular book must
feel like a passion, a calling, a vocation, or a «soul» purpose.
Rail: So much
about the reaction against Neo-Expressionism is there's a whole constellation of things that we're trying to sort through, one of those is «
authorship,» and now everyone gets very uncomfortable at the idea of art expressing the
feeling of an artist.