Sentences with phrase «fees for the transfer if»

Not exact matches

For example, if Sophie sees that you're about to be charged an overdraft fee for an account you've kept empty, Sophie could transfer a few dollars from another account to prevent For example, if Sophie sees that you're about to be charged an overdraft fee for an account you've kept empty, Sophie could transfer a few dollars from another account to prevent for an account you've kept empty, Sophie could transfer a few dollars from another account to prevent it.

But, if you want to have the 1:1 transfer option and other premium travel benefits, spring for a flexible rewards card with an annual fee, especially since most are waived for the first year.

If the publication of a transfer isn't desired, the Client can request for the details of the transfer not to be published, and must pay an additional fee (4 % of the Price) to the Contractor.

APRs range from 14.49 % to 24.49 % with no annual fee and 0 % APR on purchases and balance transfers for 12 months, if made within 60 days of opening your account.

If you're concerned about fees, look more closely at CEX.IO's fees for buying and selling bitcoin — they will be the main reason you'll lose money throughout your transfer.

If both parties charge 1.5 % for buying and selling the digital currency then they have saved a fortune in fees versus traditional money transfer services that can charge upwards of 8 %, 9 %, or more, for such transactions.

If you're looking for a balance transfer card and you have hefty balances to transfer, you might prefer the Chase Slate ® card, which offers a fee - free transfer if you complete within 60 days of opening an accounIf you're looking for a balance transfer card and you have hefty balances to transfer, you might prefer the Chase Slate ® card, which offers a fee - free transfer if you complete within 60 days of opening an accounif you complete within 60 days of opening an account.

If you are signing the Franchise Agreement as part of a franchise renewal or transfer and we determine that your Anytime Fitness center requires renovation or re-equipment, then you must pay us $ 250 for your Compliance Drawing, but we will credit $ 250 against your Monthly Fee if you complete all renovation and reequipment requirements by the required due datIf you are signing the Franchise Agreement as part of a franchise renewal or transfer and we determine that your Anytime Fitness center requires renovation or re-equipment, then you must pay us $ 250 for your Compliance Drawing, but we will credit $ 250 against your Monthly Fee if you complete all renovation and reequipment requirements by the required due datif you complete all renovation and reequipment requirements by the required due date.

If you have a European passport you can do a SEPA transfer for zero fee but you can only transfer Euros (as of this writing).

If any Shares remain outstanding after the date of termination, the Trustee thereafter shall discontinue the registration of transfers of Shares, shall not make any distributions to Shareholders, and shall not give any further notices or perform any further acts under the Trust Agreement, except that the Trustee will continue to collect distributions pertaining to Trust assets and hold the same uninvested and without liability for interest, pay the Trust's expenses and sell Bitcoins as necessary to meet those expenses and will continue to deliver Trust assets, together with any distributions received with respect thereto and the net proceeds of the sale of any other property, in exchange for Shares surrendered to the Trustee (after deducting or upon payment of, in each case, the fee to the Trustee for the surrender of Shares, any expenses for the account of the Shareholders in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Trust Agreement, and any applicable taxes or other governmental charges).

The Gunners need to sell the Chile international this winter if they are to receive any transfer fee at all for him, as he will be out of contract at the Emirates Stadium this summer.

Nevertheless, a player of his standing on and off the pitch would be a huge coup for Chelsea if such a move were to materialise, although with no mention of a transfer fee or whether or not his wage demands could be met by the Blues, it seems like it's still a long way off from becoming a reality.

Of course, as with most players, if some club is willing to pay a ridiculously high transfer fee for Ox........

If you look at what available on the transfer window in terms of experience, style of play, age, transfer fee and wages Balotelli is the best fit for Arsenal and Mr Wenger being an intellegent person and eloquent speaker is without doubt one of very few manager who could get the best out of him.

pay the madman fee of # 64.7 for higuain, and hope that he produces the goods in the first season, he is a great goal scorer but the fee is crimina, if there is no one else i would be willing to jump on board with this crazy transfer.

They are concerned over his handling of Shaw with his transfer value in mind, as if Mourinho doesn't want him in his squad, then constantly criticising him and destroying his confidence isn't going to help them in the transfer market trying to get a decent fee for him.

So I do nt think Arsenal are going for Mahrez for that kind of fee even if Mahrez personally calls up Wenger and begs him to do the transfer, I know he wont.

Newcastle United winger Hatem Ben Arfa has agreed a return to Ligue 1 «in principle» after talks with divisional strugglers OGC Nice, report the Telegraph, but the deal will only go through if the Magpies do not demand a transfer fee for a player whose relationship with the club seems to be at breaking point.

Yes the key is Wenger paying the transfer fee wanted by the selling club not under bidding like he did with Suarez, if let's say Dortmund want 55mil for Aubameyang pay 55mil don't put in a derisory offer of 40mil knowing very well it will be rejected

Losing him is a blow for Liverpool, and that's made worse by the fact that they won't even get a fee for him if an exit does materialise as his current contract expires at the end of the season and so Juve will be set to snap him up on a free transfer.

Wenger may well be ready to release the forward on a free transfer if a fee for his services can not be secured.

If an increase in salary is only going to cost 5 - 7 % of the allowed wage structure than I say sure do it as it would cost more to pay a transfer fee and a new salary for a player matching the caliber of either player.

The reason for this, apparently, is that we want too big a transfer fee and if this is true I reckon it must be because Wenger would rather have Ospina than Szczesny as back up next season.

Leaving for Lyon could be a preferred choice for Arsenal in a swap player plus less transfer fee payment for transferring Lacazette to Arsenal if Arsenal truly want him and Giroud wants to go there.

With ridiculous and over inflated transfer fees seemingly the norm these days when a Premier League club is interested, it would be handy if any prospective transfer targets were to let their wish to sign for Arsenal be known and according to The Mirror this is just what the Lyone and France international forward Alexandre Lacazette has done this week.

Even for no fee, if necessary, Sanchez must leave in January if we can force him out, since he is probably waiting for the summer now and getting a huge signing on fee, since he will be a free transfer.

In fact, if my math and recollection of the rules are correct, at $ 1.2 million (about 1 million Euros) his half season salary would need to be < $ 300k (or < $ 600k for the whole season) for his combined salary and transfer fee not to take him above the TAM buy down max salary at $ 1.5 million.

Maybe you are right but of the rumoured 150M we still have payment commitments from previous transfers that have not been completed, then wages which will be a big issue since a 40 - 60M player will probably be on 180 - 200k, also we will most likely be getting a reject like James Rodriguez or Turan since we are out of the champions league and if they are on the same level as ozil then we might as well not bother with them, then add onto the fact it may not be easy to get rid of our unwanted players like Walcott for example who will pay his 140k ontop of a 20M transfer fee?

However, if the FO believes that Bobby Wood could contribute well enough to fill our hole at forward, it could make sense to acquire him as a DP for only this year (because of the transfer fee) which would leave potentially two open DP spots (assuming Dempsey retires and Ozzie either moves or is still able to be bought down) next season to fill in other positions of need.

You've done really well I must say.It's a shame people think you are ignorant but don't know they also pass ignorant comments against you.As for Laczette the only thing which can hold back the move now is the transfer fee as he wants to leave.For Lemar, it's been stated that AS Monaco don't want to sell but if Arsenal increase their first bid very significantly they might just give in so I doubt Lemar is coming.For Sanchez it could be that he's staying because it's been proven that he contradicted himself unknowingly in the interview which he granted.

Wenger made it very clear that Bellerin was not for sale last year when he persuaded the young Spaniard to sign a new six year extension to his contract, but Barcelona just think its a ploy to get a massive transfer fee if they come in with an offer, and they think that Hector and Arsenal are more likely to be amenable to cashing in if Wenger decided not to renew in the summer.

So if Ospina is sold for a decent fee then our original reported 70m transfer budget would be in full tact.

All of Wenger's disastrous plans when it comes to transfers, both incoming and outgoing, are coming home to roost... why would anyone pay a significant fee for a player that was hardly used, is overpaid and has a spotty injury record; not to mention the fact that Wenger nickels & dimes everyone when it comes to transfers so it only makes sense that other teams would do likewise when dealing with us... the fact is I wouldn't be surprised if Wenger does this so that players won't be moved thereby giving him a ready - made excuse not to spend more money on transfers; there's a reason why the latest headlines regarding Arsenal transfers seem to suggest that we aren't bringing anyone in until some players are sold or moved elsewhere on loan... we know this club knows how to utilize press coverage to further their questionable agendas, it's the very reason why the Sanchez situation has become such a nightmare

We might sign Lacazzete, but if that means selling Sanchez to cover for the transfer fee, we're at best standing still, rather than moving forward.

The transfer fee that we will have to pay to his current club, Olympiakos, is only around # 6 million which, if true, could turn out to be a real steel for Arsenal.

You don't get it do you?I'm not even talking about the money.But I agree with you that for the kind of money that will be spent on Mbappe it's a higher gamble.Henry was bought to be a starter and as the main man for Arsenal.He was so young by then and the pressure on him was massive.Looking at the impact he's had in our club if Henry had failed who would imagine what Arsene would have done.To me he's our best player ever.Arsene put a lot of trust in him to be honest but the gamble paid off.However, I think he had a point to prove to world and to Juve hence he succeeded.The same as is with Mbappe with even a higher transfer fee and more expectation.If he's ever signed for that amount he's coming here to be the main man whowill send us into glory.Forget Ozchez for all eyes will be on him.

And just for the record I said at the time Arsenal should have made them sign and if Ozil and Sanchez did not sign tell them that they would be transferred abroad for a large fee and if they did not accept that would not play this season and therefore would not be playing in the World Cup.

In turn, Arsenal would do well to get what they can for him in January, use the money from the transfer fee and from offloading his wages on a top signing either in the same window if possible, or if not wait until the summer as they have shown they can cope without him so far this season.

Which I believe if Le Prof submits a # 40m package transfer fee offer to Monavo that's included adds on for Lemar's signature, Monaco might give their consent to him to join Arsenal.

So I don't know if you are aware of it or not but, according to various sources in the news Mesut Ozil, is the prime target for Juventus this transfer window... It seems so strange, this is the first time in a while our main players have been subject to transfer rumours and we haven't even deemed them as a credible threat... anyway the fee currently being proposed is around # 31.5 Million pounds which would mean a 11 million loss on our original investment.

If he does renew then great, if he wants to go then adios amigo, thanks for the huge transfer feIf he does renew then great, if he wants to go then adios amigo, thanks for the huge transfer feif he wants to go then adios amigo, thanks for the huge transfer fee.

If accepted, the fee would see Arsene Wenger's side smash their transfer record for the second time this summer after having acquired Alexandre Lacazette for # 52.7 m from Lyon.

If so he should make sure he gets the biggest possible transfer fees for them and immediately reinvests the money in similar replacements.

If you look at the First Five Years of the last decade Wenger at least managed to qualify for the Champions League in each of those seasons.The Second Five Years have clearly shown we as a Club have gone backwards and spiralling in a downward descent.And in these Five Years we have spent MORE money on transfer fees and player wages than at any time in the Clubs history.

If an agreement isn't reached this summer, then the La Liga outfit will face a bitterly difficult decision over whether to allow him see out the contract and lose Messi for nothing, or sell him this summer and recoup a huge transfer fee to rebuild without him.

I would take Smalling for Ox They are worth apprx same transfer fee We can always use another good CB We have plenty of forwards and if we want another Top forward then we will need to let more than one go

If they lose him next summer for free, they still make out better than any transfer fee this summer.

There seems to be problems moving on most of these simply because they are already on such massive wages at Arsenal, but there is very little room for them to playing if they stay and we could certainly do with reducing our wage bill with these departures, even if we can't get large transfer fees from the sales.

The 24 - year - old is undoubtedly one of the finest centre - backs in Europe at the moment and would surely fetch considerably more in terms of a transfer fee if not for that clause in his contract.

ARSENAL FIRST I don't blame Cesc for wanting to go and live his dream at Barca, if I was at Barca and had the opportunity to play for Arsenal id jump at the chance BUT it's the way he left.Faking injuries, paying transfer fee etc then when he sees life at the Nou camp isn't what he expected he wants to come back naaaa mate were alright son I loved Cesc in an Arsenal shirt and still felt for him in a Barca shirt now he plays for Chelsea I feel nothing for him