Sentences with phrase «fellow human beings in»

The desire to help our fellow human beings in need transcends politics and ideologies.

Further, Laurie Grengs» qualifications are supplemented by a genuine desire to assist fellow human beings in their quest to address problems that have been holding them back.

You will see not only your experiments but your fellow human beings in a fresh light.

lt is also nice to note that furums like this are available for people to post constructive and helpful comments that could be of benefit to other fellow human beings in the morals and spirituality (as this case pertains.

Christian thinkers have reflected on these boundaries with respect to their fellow human beings in other cultures, and even with respect to the other animals which share our planet, but rarely with respect to the rest of life populating the universe.

As an educated person, I and we are all aware of how people of all religions have commited harm to fellow human beings in the name of whatever religion.

To be «conservative» about society means that you are against helping your fellow human beings in any way, as we can see from their actions.

Not exact matches

When you can support someone's basic needs for esteem and appreciation by saying, «thank you» in a sincere and impactful way, you are serving mankind and your fellow human in their quest towards self - actualization.

«If you're vulnerable and isolated, the more important that cell phone becomes for you,» says Mark Latonero, a fellow at the Data & Society Research Institute in New York, who has studied technology and human trafficking.

Above all we must have compassion for the cultural and historical perspectives in which our fellow humans are embedded.

But killing off their few fellow human inhabitants may not be the right answer for the characters in the long run in a world full of the undead.

Walter is a graduate of Harvard University and currently serves as an Executive in Residence at Johns Hopkins Medicine and an Innovation Fellows Technical Advisor to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Back in the «50s, technologist Alan Turing said that true artificial intelligence would be a reality if a computer could fool a significant number of those judging (like more than 30 percent) into making them believe they were talking to a fellow human.

So how can I make a profession of faith in the presence of my fellow human beings?

In the saints, whose lives aim at eternal communion with God and with fellow human beings, Taylor identifies practical reasoners par excellence.

Many books written for Religion actually touch on the subject which is Love and being NON JUDGMENTAL because there can be no human that can tell me they know exactly what God is only my faith and love towards myself and my fellow Humans is an expression of his love not the intolerance or hatred that is spewed out in the name of God, God is ABOVE all of that CRAP PERIOD.

Once we begin to think in this way (entailing, of course, a «paradigm shift») we are able to get beyond our narrow and destructive anthropocentrism and respect nature almost as we respect our fellow humans.

He is merely saying we have a duty to our fellow humans mired in extreme poverty, that's all.

As in liberal Protestantism, the Father was Good; the Son, being human, even better and more philanthropic (well, the Jews and Muslims dropped this bit); and keeping God's commands involved less tradition or ritual and more love of our fellow - men, all men being sons of the one Father.

That, in itself, is attacking your fellow human being.

We all do things, big and small, that hurt our fellow human beings; and we are all in need of a savior to heal the brokenness from which this pain flows.

Yes, it is true that looking at the trees, we don't see God, but when we look to our fellow human beings and doing things for them, we acknowledge God's existence in the universe in the form of love.

i am good because i love life and my fellow humans beings and not for any reward in the afterlife..

And yet, in book after book, Glancy also offends many of her fellow Native writers — whose books she reads, as they read hers — by insisting that this absurdity, this intrusion of the Gospel, writ large in the history of Native Americans, is the experience of every tribe and every nation, everything and everyone human.

No one that has ever been in war can claim honor in the deaths of their fellow human beings.

Ours is indeed a consumeristic culture, the kind that too often turns people into commodities, and I believe Christians can speak into that culture in a unique, life - giving way — not only as it concerns sex - on - demand, but also as it concerns food - on - demand, celebrity - on - demand, stuff - on - demand, cheap - goods - on - demand, pornography - on - demand, entertainment - on - demand, comfort - on - demand, distraction - on - demand, information - on - demand, power - on - demand, energy - on - demand, and all those habits that tend to thrive at the expense of the dignity and value of our fellow human beings or our planet.

We are grieved by the disrespect, the abuse, the personal prejudice and institutional oppression by which humans so often dishonor the image of God in their fellow humans.

In either circumstance, supposed heroes are shown to be all too human, and this sober incongruity marked the tales my fellow teachers told.

In the story of the feeding of the 5,000 we see Jesus once again addressing the most essential, physical needs of his fellow human beings - hunger, thirst, companionship - and once again, breaking down every socially - constructed barrier that keeps us from eating with one another.

Once the young apologist, I suddenly found myself wrestling with the notion that most of my fellow human beings would suffer eternal damnation in hell for being born at the wrong place and the wrong time.

Hence, a prayer such as «Lord, save everyone» is a perfectly legitimate cry of a Christian's heart, since it is rooted in his love for his fellow human beings.

Editor's note: Arsalan Iftikhar is an international human rights lawyer, founder of TheMuslimGuy.com and legal fellow for the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding in Washington.

If we were able to conduct a survey of those human beings who are giving the most devoted service to people in need, whether it is to the blind, the deaf and dumb, the leper, the spastic or any other of our afflicted fellow human beings, I am confident that we should find the Christians in the majority.

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.

He is on the way to becoming human insofar as he is in deep communion with his fellows.

How is it possible for a moral person to live blissfully in Heaven, knowing that countless fellow human beings are shrieking and writhing in agony below them?

Let us properly dwell upon it, being convinced that for the deadly disease of «busyness» there is no medicine so specific as the pondering of the hard path of the true sufferer and as a fellow human being sharing with him in the common lot of suffering.

It seems, perhaps, if we can find some way of seeing past what appears to be incongruity and instead perceive one another primarily as a fellow human being holding to being born with dignity and equality then we might be in a good place?

In fact they are intuitions for division and war against fellow human beings.

Also no fellow human can know us in such a way that we can be sure that his acceptance includes everything about us, or that it will last.

In doing this, we have turned our backs also on our fellow human beings and find ourselves largely deprived of true relationships.

I wondered how long it would take these pundits to go after the Pope once he revealed that his beliefs are more rooted in the teachings of Jesus than prior Popes and most Christians these days — he believes in compassion, charity, and love for his fellow human being.

In such a religious society, to condemn a fellow human being to death would not involve divine pretension.

thank you... this concept is seemingly so foreign to the religious... you do good because it gives you the best feeling in the world to help fellow human beings... no strings attached, no heaven and hell stuff... just helping out someone who needs help... the human thing to do...

The pragmatist refuses to settle for any definitive way of describing ourselves and our fellow human beings because the world is still in the making.

Even when, like the characters in The Story of the Night, they seem to have fallen away from treating themselves, or their fellow human beings, with the appropriate respect, Jews and others in today's counterculture committed to the mystery of human responsibility before God, and charged with the task of pursuing our own unique individual and communal destiny in a conformist, uncomprehending world, need such reminders.

Clearly, the philanthropist has a sincere interest in the welfare of his fellow men, and this interest is normally presented as disinterested: all the philanthropist wants to see is happy fellow humans.

In his letter to the early Church, the Apostle James writes that we must show no partiality and reiterates what Jesus said was the greatest commandment in relation to our fellow human beings — to love our neighbor as we love ourselves (James 2:1, 8In his letter to the early Church, the Apostle James writes that we must show no partiality and reiterates what Jesus said was the greatest commandment in relation to our fellow human beings — to love our neighbor as we love ourselves (James 2:1, 8in relation to our fellow human beings — to love our neighbor as we love ourselves (James 2:1, 8).

These people fully believed they were in the right, because they thought God had directed them to commit these crimes against their fellow human beings, and they were largely unwilling to even begin questioning their long - held beliefs.

Ever since the introduction of Negro slaves into Virginia in 1619, many Christians had been uneasy about the buying and selling of their fellow human beings.