Based on the 1994 novel by Peter Ackroyd, the story was adapted for the big screen by Jane Goldman and has been hailed by some critics for
its feminist views, specifically through the portrayal of Elizabeth Cree.
Yearning to stay connected without a man in her life, she imparts
her feminist views on her son all while allowing him to make his own mistakes.
Before then, though she espoused
feminist views and mentored younger women from early on in her career, she was heavily focused on pursuing her own research to earn tenure, and spent her personal time on raising her family — not actively working to make the system more equitable.
Critics over the decades have derided the MP for Peckham as Harriet Harperson because of
her feminist views.
Not to pick on our Shiite friends alone, Hillary Clinton, known for her firm
feminist views, happily did business with Saudi Arabia where women aren't allowed to be out of the house without a chaperone etc...
Her proto -
feminist views were a complete contrast to a personal life dominated by an unhappy relationship.
This accords with
feminist views that changing the images, language, and concepts of experience will, in effect, alter what women experience.
At the same time, the church is told by feminists that its Scriptures, the only written guarantees of its freedom in Christ, are now suspect and to be judged as true only if they accord with modern
feminist views.
How have they negotiated the relationship between Scripture, Christian tradition, and
their feminist views?
Although as an analyst she was radical for her times in
her feminist views, she lacked the explicit emphasis of radical feminist therapists today on the therapeutic necessity of empowering people in therapy to change the social - political causes of their personal problems.
During the 90's I respected
the feminist view and didn't compliment a woman, hold the door for her, let alone let her always go ahead of me in line.
The new
feminist view, as advanced by Drucilla Cornell in the Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, as well as by others, recognizes that justifying abortion under the right to privacy has become problematical.
The Court moved a long way toward making homosexual conduct a constitutional right, adopted the radical
feminist view that men and women are essentially identical, continued to view the First Amendment as a protection of self - gratification rather than of the free articulation of ideas, and overturned two hundred years of history to hold that political patronage is unconstitutional.
Radical
feminists view society as fundamentally a patriarchy in which men dominate and oppress women, and seek to abolish the patriarchy in order to liberate everyone from an unjust society by challenging existing social norms and institutions.
Similarly
the feminist view of leadership espoused by Sinclair (2014, p. 25) recognises leadership as «a relational, discursive and intersubjective phenomena between people» and it is more than just a job but like Greenfield it is about people and interactions.
It provides an enlightening, more
feminist view of these women who are voiceless and blamed.
Radical
feminists view society as fundamentally a patriarchy in which men dominate and oppress women, and seek to abolish the patriarchy in order to liberate everyone from an unjust society by challenging existing social norms and institutions.
Radical
feminists view society as fundamentally a patriarchy in which men dominate and oppress women, and seek to abolish the patriarchy in order to liberate everyone from an unjust society by challenging existing social norms and institutions.
Not exact matches
«I have never considered myself a
feminist or a female entrepreneur,» said Jane Poynter, pioneer in the «space travel» industry and CEO of World
View Enterprises.
Thus, debates between, for example, Roman Catholic natural law theorists and secular
feminist legal theorists over abortion are, for Posner, a waste of time, for neither theoretical approach possesses the tools to persuade anyone of contrary
views.
It is also problematic when
viewed from a
feminist perspective.
In dealing with political theology from the perspective of process theology it will be important to keep centrally in
view what has already been learned through a partial assimilation of
feminist insights.
Moreover, our
feminist thinkers rightly point out that such a dualist
view of reality is largely responsible for maintaining a patriarchal and hierarchical model of society.
Like the American Negroes who adopted the word «black» from the enemy and flung it back, or the
feminists who accept «witch» and «bitch» as badges of honor, Dobson and Hindson are in a mood and movement that take fundamentalism back as a banner for pride and boasting and wave it in the faces of the, in their
view, waning evangelicals.
I speak throughout Canada and internationally to churches, conferences, women's groups, universities, and workshops on topics ranging from spiritual formation, a sacramental
view of living, being a Christian
feminist, the ways that we can navigate change throughout our faith journey, the embrace of ancient church practices as a charismatic Christian, writing, social justice, and many other topics.
This failure can be illustrated with the same example, for although Marxists on the whole have been less sexist in their attitudes than have psychoanalysts, they appear only a little less deficient when
viewed in the light of contemporary
feminist consciousness.37 Or, again, use of Marxist sociology by Latin American theologians of liberation has done little to free them from implicit anti-Judaism in their theological formulations.
In
view of the stronger logic behind the Catholic perspective, it is hardly surprising that
feminist critics of the American pro-life movement see in it the Catholic agenda of restricting artificial birth control and genetic engineering.
Despite the mouthing of traditional formulas, when these positions are given full theological explication, they will be found to express a fundamentally different
view of the Bible — fully consistent with the radical party of evangelical
feminists but irreconcilable with Lindsell's understanding.
A more conservative party of
feminists attempts to offer new exegesis of traditional passages while maintaining an older
view of the Scriptures.
Feminists as a whole, she says, deride all forms of service or self - sacrifice and «consider any
view of marriage as sacrament or covenant a self - serving deception» that oppresses women — a gross misrepresentation of many
feminist theologians who affirm both marriage and altruism.
While I in no way wish to say that Daly's or Raymond's
views need validation from a «dead, white male philosopher,» I do believe, first of all, that Whiteheadian philosophy will be enhanced by the incorporation of women's experience (inclusive of
feminist philosophy as part of women's experience).
There are many mysterious things about the modern world, but the biggest mystery of all is how «the sexual revolution» is
viewed as some sort of
feminist triumph, when the objective truth is that if the most despicable, cretinous, woman - loathing men of a century ago had outlined their....
I understand having shhared what you have about being a
feminist that you would disagree with it and I respect your freedom to come to your own conclusion and express your
views.
In contrast,
feminist thinkers tend to
view with suspicion anything which claims objectivity.
An over-arching reason for experimenting with process philosophy as a contribution to
feminist construction of a new
view of relations is that it provides a cosmology radically different from dominant mechanistic and patriarchal world
views.
The dramatic emergence of African - American,
feminist, womanist, North American Hispanic, Third World and Two - Thirds World, laity, Native American, Asian and Asian - American points of
view is a fact of life in much of the field of systematics, minimal but growing among systematics teachers, significantly present in required readings and supplemental bibliography, and proffered by guest lecturers.
Theology and spirituality, especially from a
feminist and constructive point of
view, are some of our greatest shared interests, but when it also consumes much of our professional life we have to be intentional and aware about the boundaries we place on our life and relationship.
Which is always weird to say — since my
views run very counter to many
feminists.
One home was headed by my sophisticated, East Coast - born,
feminist mother; the other by my down - to - earth, Idaho - bred father, who held fast to his traditionalist
views.
As
feminist psychologists have shown, his
views of «inner space» reflect sex role stereotypes, even though they are far less blatant than Freud's sexist biases.
I'm a Jesus
feminist because when I let Jesus into my heart, He showed me that the only thing limiting my
view of the world was me.
Thus a young instructor applying for a job in an elite university is well advised to hide «unsound»
views such as political allegiance to the right wing of the Republican party (perhaps even to the left wing), opposition to abortion or to other causes of the
feminist movement, or a strong commitment to the virtues of the corporation.
Unlike the secular materialists I had studied in my
feminist philosophy class that semester or the exhibitionist pop divas whose reductive
views of women's liberation had shaped my generation, Teresa had something genuinely hopeful to say to me.
There also seems to be a sex difference — women are more attracted to this
view than men, perhaps because many of these ideas grew out of
feminist theory in the 1990s.
In this book the primary questioning is from the point of
view of religious pluralism with secondary attention to
feminist concerns.
This is what its critics, whether
feminist or orthodox, have been saying all along, although from opposite points of
view.
I had no idea a blog post written tongue - in - cheek about whether women should marry attractive men or not would create such a furor — Jezebel thinks I'm blaming women for men's bad behavior (I'm not); Rush Limbaugh thinks I'm a militant
feminist (wow, is he ever wrong, but I already knew that about him); the ladies of «The
View» debated it; Shannon Devereaux Sanford interviewed me for her show, Shannon's Corner on WTBQ in New Jersey; the podcast «The Bold and the Beautiful» talked about the column (they called me a «great» columnist!)
Many
feminists believed that her
views hurt the cause of equal rights for women by inducing guilt in working mothers.
Apparently our buy - in to the ««noble savage»
view of parenting» removes us from rights and opportunities her generation of
feminists worked hard to secure.
The pattern of female identification with male generated
views was noted long ago by the early
feminist Simone DeBeauvoir.