Sentences with phrase «few argue this point»

Home births have a proven track record of safety for women, and few argue this point.

Here is a few arguing points found in the current research to help you decide whether or not HFCS really is a danger.

Not exact matches

Few could argue that Americans are a slightly rounder society at this point in time.

The proposal has generated a great deal of often vitriolic debate over the future of the wheat board, and the C.D. Howe Institute recently weighed in with a report arguing that global grain markets have changed significantly over the past few decades, to the point that the CWB is more often than not a price taker.

A few times during the session Kogan made a point of arguing that data audits are essentially useless for catching bad actors — claiming that anyone who wants to misuse data can simply put a copy on a hard drive and «store it under the mattress».

A few days later, while arguing that his personal feelings on the matter should not affect the ultimate decision to accept or reject the proposal, he stated, «from my [point of view] it seems that the community's feeling on this issue isalready [sic] clear.»

The point is that if more people are admitting that they are Atheist then it is cool but, does that herald the end of the church... no and as we have been arguing a few threads up... the Faithful have continued to grow.

So if you have a triune god who is father, son, and holy ghost but you have a mother of the human manifestation of father / son god — then Mary is arguably the mother of god and in that way could be argued as the more divine at some point in the history of the transformation of the triune god in heaven to the triune god on earth and of course the few days when the triune god on earth was dead (but not really dead) before rising.

I might argue a few fine points here and there.

Now, as Nagel argues, this is not the sort of question that you can answer by looking at a few examples (bats for Nagel, Christians for us) and pointing and saying, «Well, being a bat (or a Christian) is like this.»

It should be pointed out, though, that nothing in the social - constructivist position legitimates the denial of rights... Assertive gay liberationists have argued that it may be strategically wiser to concede the possibility that a few students might be influenced to become gay by having an openly gay teacher as a role model, and to say, «So what?»

There are a few points in the book in which it would appear that the authors depart from their own sense of what is licit and illicit out of deferrence to certain academic Catholic bioethicists who persist in arguing for the permissibility of so - called «borderline» assisted reproductive techniques such as Gamete Intra Fallopian Transfer (GIFT) and Artificial Insemination by Husband (AIH) or insist that the Church may still allow for so - called embryo adoption.

By this point in the season, one could argue that there are only a select few teams realistically still fighting to reach the postseason.

Even before his last few games and I've argued this point with you previously.

They argue that increasing breastfeeding rates would result in significant public health savings from fewer instances of ear infection, diarrhea etc... This is true to a point but, let's say you could set BF rates at 100 %.

Yes, some Democrats will argue that a few tens of thousands of votes here and there would have swung the election in Clinton's direction, but the point is that they didn't.

So the pluralist challenge for Caroline Lucas is whether she is going to strongly back the Yes campaign, which is seen as positive by most - longstanding pro-PR voices across various campaigns or parties, or continue to argue after the next few weeks over the Bill that there is nothing much at stake, so that through to next May her primary point is that it doesn't really matter if its not PR.

Facing numerous analyses showing his signature jobs programs misallocated resources and put few New Yorkers to work, Gov. Andrew Cuomo argued today that any such assessments are only a matter of political point of view.

When I first used to work in Westminster in the late «70s, you've got to remember there were very, very few places where people did interviews... 15 years later, with wall - to - wall 24 - hour news and the constant soundbite world, I think that finding a way to subvert the soundbite world is a duty for all of us and it's quite difficult... As somebody who would never argue against more outlets, one of the consequences we have to cope with is that people are trained up earlier and more efficiently and more boringly to avoid being interesting, avoid getting to the point.

Except for a radical fringe that sees anything scientific as bad, few would argue this point.

In this rough - draft article, she argues that the scientific labor market is broken, that the U.S. educational system actually produces too many qualified researchers for too few positions, and that a perverse funding structure perpetuates the problem, among other points.

Despite these shortfalls, the film does successfully manage to explore some interesting themes of diplomacy and leadership along the way, and even though it could be argued that the narrative itself is bland and unimaginative, barely moving from its starting point to its conclusion, the weight, intensity and emotional journey Caesar and his comrades evoke, more than make up for its few short comings.

There are few ways to poke that proverbial bear with greater effectiveness than to argue that increasing the diversity of casting in superhero movies is a good thing; not to mention, necessary, to reflect the growing fanbase of superhero and comic book movies, which continues to break down the barriers of race and gender (case in point: just ask Tumblr how many women love Tony Stark and Loki).

Second, few educators of the gifted would argue with the core tenets set forth in Turning Points (Carnegie Task Force on the Education of Young Adolescents, 1989) that middle school programs should: (1) create small communities of learning within larger school settings, (2) teach a solid academic core, (3) ensure success for all students, (4) enable educators closest to students to make important decisions about teaching and learning, (5) staff middle schools with teachers trained to work effectively with early adolescents, (6) promote health and fitness, (7) involve families in the education of learners, and (8) connect schools with communities.

In a way that you must have felt is clever and subtled l (it wasn't) you called me a hypocrite because I am stating that one medium (I assume your pet medium) is not more eco-friendly; I am calling your out for arguing in bad faith (or worse, someone who didn't bother to read a few short paragraphs before making a needlealss point).

While it can be argued that the annual fee for the Propel World credit card is effectively lower ($ 175 annual fee - $ 100 airline incidental benefit = $ 75) than the Sapphire Preferred's ($ 95), it has fewer and lower point opportunities.

I also pointed out why I believe the risk profile on bonds is currently upside down, arguing that for one of the few times in history they may actually be more dangerous an investment than equities.

For the last few years it was hard to argue as they could point out that their payments were not going toward a declining asset, not to mention they were not responsible for the maintenance and upkeep that homeowners had to take to keep their property current.

How about you try a refreshing approach, like... call me crazy perhaps, but arguing a point based on science, with a few reference links even.

There is absolutely no evidence for a very low sensitivity inherent within the Earth system, and there are only a few authors currently publishing, such as Lindzen or Spencer, that are still arguing the point... generally based on very questionable methodology and assumptions that do not stand up as being robust to a wide line of evidence.

I pointed out that the world could well have seen these temps / rates before (in fact go back millions of years and it probably did, along with quite a few extinctions), but we're arguing about the warming today.

Few will argue that we can put CO2 into the atmosphere at present rates forever, either we'll run out of fossil fuels, or there'll be a point where adding further CO2 clearly will be the more expensive option, and in the extreme (there's plenty of carbon in the Earth's crust, and failing that the solar system) it'll turn the Earth into Venus eventually, and probably before that the CO2 itself would start getting toxic (at a few ten thousand ppm it ought to get to levels that'll kill uFew will argue that we can put CO2 into the atmosphere at present rates forever, either we'll run out of fossil fuels, or there'll be a point where adding further CO2 clearly will be the more expensive option, and in the extreme (there's plenty of carbon in the Earth's crust, and failing that the solar system) it'll turn the Earth into Venus eventually, and probably before that the CO2 itself would start getting toxic (at a few ten thousand ppm it ought to get to levels that'll kill ufew ten thousand ppm it ought to get to levels that'll kill us).

I recall reading a discussion a few years ago when some applied scientist was arguing this point and saying that word wasn't in the original statements of the law, he quoted from old physics text books he had learned from as well as current ones in use in his industry.

Some studies do try (I am aware of a few), and in this case I would argue that you have a point: the «trend» has to be modeled realistically.

Few would argue the point that many of our laws are anachronistic.

The National Law Journal's Tony Mauro noted a few years ago the example of an attorney who makes a point of wearing a tie given to him as a memento eight years previously by the widow of a partner who used to wear it when he argued.

Interestingly, this was one of the few points where the Court disregarded AG Kokott's Opinion, where she argued that «it is ultimately immaterial whether the scheme can be assigned to a traditional category of rebate» (point 29).

«Very few clients want to establish a point of principle in the tribunal, in the EAT, in the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court,» he argues.

If we attempt to analyse the few facts that seem to be known, the first part of the test is relatively easy to overcome in that it is clear that the aircraft was under the respondents control, there was an attempt by the respondents to argue the point on the basis that Mr Williams was on a gratuitous joy ride which had not been sanctioned by them.

Without arguing that retributive damages would be a superior strategy to all these other mechanisms, let me raise a few cautionary points.

What is clear from these recent cases is that less may well be more when arguing jurisdiction points; and that there are likely to be fewer successful appeals on jurisdiction issues in the future.

Neither was it persuasive to argue, as the government did, that the starting point of exceptionality was reasonable since only a few persons would be affected, implying as it did the possibility of justifying the restriction of the applicants» Convention rights by the minimal number of persons adversely affected.

In fact, few would argue with the notion that courts have a general duty to make court records accessible to the public, a point that the Supreme court has made abundantly clear over the last few decades, and that is intimately linked to our fundamental «freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication».

Venture capitalist Fred Wilson makes exactly this point in a blog post Thursday, in which he argues that the economics around mobile platforms such as the iPhone and the iPad (s aapl)-- and other tablets, presumably — will likely come to look a lot like the economics of the web itself, in which closing off access to content via paywalls and walled gardens has not proven to be a very successful long - term approach (with a few notable exceptions such as The Economist and the Wall Street Journal (s nws)-RRB-.

Few would realistically argue that bitcoin will service 100 % of even these silos in the near term, but the volume / supply ratio is the starting point for understanding bitcoin price — as more consumers or organizations choose to use bitcoin, increased volume will drive the price up.

Here are five of the main points that Gottman argues, or in other words, a few signs you're in a relationship that will last, according to psychology:

YMMV and plenty would argue otherwise, but this has been my experience over many years, many different properties, in a few different markets, at many price points and price - to - rent ratios, in both high and low markets.