Sentences with phrase «few arguments from»

Here are a few arguments from both sides of the fence to consider if you're thinking about a job search this holiday season.

Let's look at a few arguments from the bulls and bears to get a better understanding of the business.

He also makes quite a few arguments from omission, concluding from the fact that the text doesn't explicitly report that Esther «went to synagogue» that she must have been a worldly, lukewarm Jew, forgetting that Esther is the one who calls for a fast later in the story, reflecting something of a religious background and personal religious conviction.

Not exact matches

Anyway, if you work in one of the few organizations that haven't yet been bitten by this egregiously awful management fad, here are 16 solid arguments why private offices, working from home, and even cubicles are better for business than these glorified hotel lobbies.

Is an increase from 2.6 % of GDP in 1981 to 3.1 % of GDP in 2012 unsustainable?  Yes, I suppose so, if this rate of increase continues for another few centuries. The same argument the CFIB makes for municipal spending could be made for corporate profits but far moreso. After adjusting for inflation, corporate profits have increased by 245 % since 1992, doubling as a share of GDP and growing at a rate of ten times Canadaâ $ ™ s cumulative population growth of just 23 % since 1992.

If We are to «Go G - dless» as the graphic suggests just because a few Fools abuse religion, then by the same logic We should also abstain from alcohol just because a few Fools drive drunk, abstain from communicating just because a few Fools put forth unsound argument, and abstain from eating just because a few Fools eat too much.

He reprises several arguments from his address to the extraordinary consistory on the family a few months ago at the Vatican.

A long series like this is probably not the best way to use a blog, since readers come and go, and miss a post or two, and since the argument builds from post-to-post, if someone is just jumping in or misses a few post, they won't understand the flow of thought that brought us here.

We and the world in which we live would, in my opinion, be the better for it if we followed and did as Jesus taught, which so few do, rather than spend our hours and days in endless discussions and arguments defending what we suppose to be a group of perfect, from the mouth of God, writings.

That his concern is legitimate few will deny, and wholly apart from the theoretical issue noted above, this concern constitutes a strong practical argument for a liberal polity (which does no more than promote «some kind of equilibrium, necessarily unstable, between the different aspirations of different groups of human beings»).

Two philosophers from Oxford and Cambridge respectively, Simon Blackburn and Leslie Green, presented the main argument against the validity of Pope Benedict's phrase, simply pointing out that in practice very few people at present are radically relativist in all morality to the point of being anarchic and care-less of cruelty.

(After being in a few porn shops, I find it very difficult to believe the argument put forth by some that porn frees people from hang - ups.)

In recent years few have attempted to revive the argument for Christianity from miracles.

Because the Wankel is such a departure from normal automotive engines, an ongoing argument has developed over how to determine its displacement or «size,» and as long as the dispute is unresolved, few people will experiment with the power plant in big - time competition.

Nobody runs from the few arguments you actually make.

When Westbrook gave his speech, it felt as if — away from the season and the arguments that became so extreme that they engendered personal dislike or devotion toward him, a man who few of the people who took part in the debate have ever met — the watching world was given a glimpse into his person.

There are a fair few arguments that kick off on here regarding players playing in their «natural» positions and everyone has a single position tag / label they want to pin on a player and throw fits if Wenger deviates from this.

«The much - touted «biblical argument» in support of corporal punishment is founded upon proof - texting a few isolated passages from Proverbs.

Josh Levy may call this argument a straw man, but I've been hearing variants of it from quite a few people over the last four or five years, and it's always made me nervous.

They first used the argument that they have a religious opinion that bars them from purchasing insurance, seeing it as a form or gambling, among a few other things.

The strategy memo from Greenberg Quinlan Rosner and the think tank Third Way also warns that while few voters expect a national energy overhaul to be inexpensive, Democrats are susceptible to Republican arguments that energy proposals will be overly burdensome.

If you take nothing else from this article, please do not buy into this argument because people are people and everyone deserves a shot at the top prize; it is not reserved for a privileged few!

Few people actually support the idea that food quality is irrelevant, but it's a common straw man argument from many people who promote «clean eating.»

I understand the «hollow box» argument — pretty packaging housing nothing — but I don't think that argument holds at all for «Crimson Peak,» a gorgeous Gothic Romance with committed performances from everyone and some of the best technical elements of the last few years.

Taking a few pages from the tearjerker playbook, the film tugs at the heartstrings with heated spousal arguments in kitchens, nostalgic home videos and even some daddy issues for good measure

I did want to follow up to a few of the comments from you and others on my recent post, The False Arguments of Carol Burris Against High Standards.

Temeraire could disagree, very vehemently, but when Iskierka had chivvied a few of her crew — newly brought on in Madras — into bringing up the sea - chests from below, and throwing open the lids to let the sunlight in upon the heaped golden vessels, and even one small casket of beautifully cut gemstones, he found his arguments did ring a little hollow.

At the same time, a few months ago some authors were saying anybody who gets victimized by Amazon probably had it coming (several people used that argument against me when my books were nearly pulled from KU).

Rather than describing a situation in which publishers withheld great books from consumers (which is what it sounds like on the surface of his argument), Byng feels that publishers should cut their titles — and therefore the number of authors they work with — and instead focus all of their efforts and attention on a few titles that they deem worthy.

The door isn't entirely closed on that tablet though... Samsung has appealed the ruling that prohibits the company from selling its original 10 inch Android tablet and an appeals court will hear that argument a few days before the December 22nd hearing.

Now that may reflect local culture, and to the extent that it does, it is hard to impossible to untangle the cost / benefit analysis that says that one major reason for filing bankruptcy is to stop wage garnishments, and if you don't have that reason, bankruptcy filings will be less, from an argument that the lack of wage garnishment reflects a culture that somehow leads to fewer bankruptcy filings.

Legends like Hulk Hogan, Randy «Macho Man» Savage and Andre the Giant, and the pits them against current superstars like John Cena, Kane and Triple H. It's an impressive roster in its entirety, and while there are a few missing from the list that you would expect to be there it's still got almost every big name you'd want to see, though the list will doubtless spark arguments amongst the most «hardcore» wrestling fans out there.

So much more could have been done with this premise, yet doesn't take long for the game to go from playfully teasing fans about the ending to slapping them in the face every few minutes with some ham - fisted writing that increasingly becomes the arguments of a team who clearly feel their audience just didn't, «get it.»

Wouldn't it be better if we put our efforts on accurate shorter term temperature projections, say what will happen in 6 months no more than a few years from now, check the models and brag about their accuracy or correct their failures, if the models are continuously correct all contrarian arguments die.

This argument has also been going on for circumstances a few steps away from the present.

So he will likely use some variation of the argument from authority and toss a few personal insults your way... if he responds at all.

A few months ago, John Abraham from St Thomas University produced an excellent rebuttal of Christopher Monckton's arguments.

Over the next year or so I began to see fewer references from AGW supporters to the Industrial Revolution as a start point and more emphasis on the spread of industry in the early 20th century, until I came across anti arguments pointing out that after the rise of temps to the third and fourth decades the world began to cool again, considerably.

I thought explaining how they have taken out the real heat from the Sun because they had to use its measurements for their «backradiation from greenhouse gases» would be the easiest to explain..., the arguments about the second law are interminable because few understand that physics well enough to counter the AGW tweaking of it by several sleights of hand.

It's at least more credible than Hansen's «runaway greenhouse» nonsense, which can be dismissed on rather elementary grounds (without clouds at least), but I think Tamino's post before about «changing the dice» a bit to land more higher numbers, and possibly a few 19's and 20's, is a much more appropriate analogy than the argument that the system behavior will deviate substantially from smoothly varying statistics

Their arguments are few: • I haven't seen real change in Iowa, just the usual variability (from an Iowa farmer) • there is disagreement among respected scientists, so I can take whatever position I want and run with it, loudly and forcefully (a popular argument in all discussions, although scientists in the same position often become less assertive about their position).

It's what I call an «I reckon» argument: the sort of argument you'd make in a pub, after a few beers, based on information you've established from a gut feeling so strong it doesn't need any awkward details like facts getting in the way of your opinion.

The argument presented in their detailed description is built upon the assumption of undersaturation of CaCO3 as far as I can understand from the few sentences.

This argument BTW is used to rescue C - AGW from the saturation hypothesis — that the narrow IR absorption band of CO2 is completely absorbed by a few tens of meters of air only, and that something like 50 ppm CO2 «saturates» the IR absorption — more CO2 has no effect.

A few noted skepticism of climate science, saying carbon dioxide is «part of the cycle of life,» but for many opponents of the Clean Power Plan, the argument wasn't whether climate change was real but whether the plan's target on reducing emissions from coal power would effectively slow global warming.

Even if this lagged or what not CO2 feedback argument is right (it is too much for my poor little physicist brain, I would need an electronic prototype) we must still have a few hundred years from 1950s when we sinned and burned and produced CO2, until we see this glorious lagged or what not feedback operating.

All that having been said, let's take another look at the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) argument, first noting the following: The proponents of AGW argue that, right from the beginning of the Industrial Revolution when there were no automobiles, very few steam engines, and only 1.2 billion people (versus today's 7 billion), the introduction of initially tiny quantities of a weak greenhouse gas produced, without time - delay, an in - phase and measurable rise in global temperatures that continues to this day.

A few months after holding an hourlong oral argument, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed in late July to remand the case to the trial judge, U.S. District Judge Lawrence F. Stengel, who, in turn, agreed to vacate eight of his published opinions and to «direct» Lexis and Westlaw to remove them from their databases.

Few judges prefer to have their heads bobbing from footnotes to text when trying to decide what weight to give to sentence X in the appellant's argument.

The jury's role is always the same - show up, be selected and sworn in, listen to the opening and closing arguments and the evidence that the judge admits under the rules of evidence, listen to the jury instructions from the judge, deliberate and render a verdict based upon that deliberation in a manner set forth on a jury verdict form that the jury is provided with by the judge, they do this for sub-minimum wage jury fees, a few free meals, and maybe a parking or transit voucher.