Sentences with phrase «few op eds»

Well... other than a few op eds I have in the pipeline with some cancellation follow up, you'll likely never see me mention it again as this was the last wave.

Not exact matches

A few days following the publication of the second op - ed, I also received and published an op - ed that was immensely critical of the campaign to remove Scaramucci.

In this age of never - ending news, Twitter arguments, and viral sound - bites, op - ed pages are among the few remaining places for serious, detailed, and articulate debates on important public issues.

Parents of highly creative children had an average of fewer than one rule,» writes Grant in the op - ed.

But an op - ed by the USA Today editorial board earlier this month turned things up more than a few notches.

That was the name of a Warren Buffett op - ed from a few years ago, and while I know this is a heavier lift for Rs — «coddling the rich» is analogous to... Read more

One of the articles on post truth politics said its naive for us to expect the media to «call foul» and penalize right wing parties for lying and rejecting all attempts at compromise, because the media won't do it (as Jean's op - ed in the Herald demonstrates), so we and the few progressive media outlets left in this country need to do it ourselves.

A few months ago, Blinder wrote an op - ed in the Wall Street Journal making the case for Yellen, who he said «outside the narrow confines of economists and people who dote on central banking... is virtually unknown.»

It occurs to me that, despite the unprecedented flood of writings of all sorts — books, blog - posts, newspaper op - eds, and academic journal articles — addressing just about every monetary policy development during and since the 2008 financial crisis, relatively few attempts have been made to step back...

Robert Shiller has been writing op - eds for the past few years discussing the extreme valuations and wondering how they persist.

Facebook founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg responded recently to these latest complaints in a Washington Post op - ed, and in his defense of Facebook, articulated the «few simple ideas» upon which it was built.

-- but also because it expands on the Northwestern University professor and head of the Relationships and Motivation Lab's provocative New York Times op - ed of the same name a few years back.

Daniel's New York Times op - ed on her study's findings, «A Hidden Cost to Giving Kids Their Vegetables,» generated a lot of discussion both on this blog and on the Times website, and within a few days Daniel contacted me and kindly offered to be interviewed here on TLT.

A few weeks ago, I shared on The Lunch Tray's Facebook page a widely read Washington Post op - ed urging President Obama to articulate a national food policy for the last two years of his term.

This is now a few weeks old but I wanted to share this Politico op - ed from Marion Nestle (Food Politics) and Rob Waters explaining — in response to another op - ed by a Republican Congressman — why it's actually OK for the Center for Disease Control to tell Americans that some foods are, you know, not very good for us.

First, here are a few excerpts from my recent op - ed on why Espada Must Reconsider Vacancy Decontrol, despite the fact that he is correct to assert that most rents in his district are in danger of going above $ 2,000 per month just yet:

That comment is just the latest, as she criticized Cuomo in a Times article in January and then in an op - ed published in the same paper a few weeks later.

In 1998, Bast wrote in a Heartland op - ed that smoking is not deadly and has «few, if any adverse health effects».

Senator Rand Paul, a Republican presidential hopeful, recently wrote in an op - ed that «the federal government has awarded taxpayer dollars toward research that few Americans would consider to be in the national interest.»

Writing in his always - entertaining blog a few weeks ago, Whitney Tilson gave a nice nod to Dan Willingham's New York Times op - ed addressing the sorry state of American teacher preparation.

For instance, because many of the burdens of adulthood involve reading informational texts ranging from the newspaper to business correspondence to voting ballots to scientific reports, the English classroom should raise the portion of informational texts on the syllabus — fewer novels and more op - eds.

Education Week: Your husband has written a few op - eds expressing reservationswith some of the ways states and districts are carrying out teacher evaluation — publishing of scores, for instance.

Just a few months ago, after much of what I predicted in 2012 came to pass, and after K - 12 News Network played a key role in launching the 18 months of investigative journalism surrounding John Deasy's botched iPad and MiSiS deals, I wrote this op - Ed, «LAUSD Haste Makes Waste»: http://thewire.k12newsnetwork.com/2014/12/02/lausd-haste-makes-ed-tech-waste/

More than a year into her role as education secretary, she continues to «undermine and obliterate the very system that opens its doors to all, not just a few, students,» penned García in an op - ed for the Atlantic Journal Constitution.

Marcus Winters recently researched why public charter schools have fewer students with special needs than district schools («The truth about charter schools and special education,» Op - Ed, Oct. 1), and the results confirm what charter schools have been saying for a while.

Lee has a few other ideas for marketing e-books — something which, in a Seattle Times op - ed, she calls «an amazingly hard nut to crack.»

Most op - ed pieces are fairly short (fewer than 750 words), so you must be selective.

I had a few takers, including one publisher of a community newspaper who wrote me to say (and this is an exact quote): «This looks like a good op - ed.

Robert Shiller has been writing op - eds for the past few years discussing the extreme valuations and wondering how they persist.

A few months ago I briefly touched on the troubling and frustrating trend of gaming consumers becoming increasingly accepting of pay - to - win systems in MMORPGs following my reading of a terrific op - ed on the subject at MassivelyOP.

Some of its associated artists were part of collectives like the Anonima Group — founded in 1960 by Ed Mieczkowski, Frank Hewitt, and Ernst Benkert — but Op Art as a style wasn't nestled in the hands of a few promoters, nor situated in a specific locale.

A few days after Artnet posted my Op - Ed, The Copyright Bungle, excoriating the decision in Patrick Cariou's copyright infringement case against Richard Prince and Gagosian Gallery, I received an email from none other than Cariou himself.

The Wall Street Journal posted yet another op - ed by 16 scientists and engineers, which even include a few climate scientists -LRB-!!!).

As soon as I read this op - ed, I wrote a few colleagues to share it with them and to get their views.

An op - ed in the NY Times a few weeks ago said each person in the big 4 western economies — North America, Japan, Australia, and Western Europe — was consuming, on average, 32 times as much as a citizen of a developing country.

When anyone threatens to compete for real estate on op ed pages and talk shows there is a huge push back, not just from the few denialists but from the entire public affairs apparatus that is pushing them.

[Response: The last few posts, commenting on the Will column, the Novak column and Lindzen's WSJ op - ed inevitably impinged on politics, but the main reason for commenting on them in RC is that all three pieces propagated junk science.

I've just submitted a brief Letter to the Editor of the WSJ, raising a few issues with Lindzen's op - ed.

Thus, even viewed as a scientific experiment, a rejection of a single — or even a few — op eds by the WSJ would tell you very little.

The purveying of propositions like these by a few scientists who do or should know better — and their parroting by amateur skeptics who lack the scientific background or the motivation to figure out what's wrong with them — are what I was inveighing against in the op - ed and will continue to inveigh against.

Last time it did, in response to a letter filled with false statements (to the extent that even Nordhaus felt it necessary to point out the misrepresentation of his work), it followed that response a few days later with yet another op - ed containing a supposed rebuttal, adding further injury to insult.

The last few days have seen frenzied volleys in the fight over climate science and policy, beginning with a 16 - author op - ed article in The Wall Street Journal on Friday and, most recently, with a 39 - author rebuttal published today in the paper.

Look at the report — the committee read 376 emails from the «Climategate file», blogs, op - eds, newspaper reports, journal and magazine articles at the inquiry stage and the same things and a few more official documents at the investigation stage.

In a 1998 op - ed, Bast claimed that «moderate» smoking does not raise a smoker's risk of lung cancer, and there are «few, if any, adverse health effects» connected to it.

In 1998, Bast wrote in a Heartland op - ed that smoking is not deadly and has «few, if any adverse health effects».

Yet this criticism and broad - brush critique of the Post focuses on a handful of columns by Will and op - eds by a few others, and overlooks the many other editorials, op - eds, columns, and letters - to - the - editor at the Post opinion pages that assert the consensus views on climate science.

Posted from The American Spectator By Paul Chesser — A few weeks back (and in subsequent op - eds) I introduced the latest student indoctrination effort to fight global warming, via the Alliance for Climate Education, which seeks invitations from high schools to deliver assembly presentations during class time.

A few months ago, author - turned - lawyer Elizabeth Wurtzel stirred up some controversy with an op - ed in The Wall Street Journal arguing that perhaps time spent working at BigLaw was just one big waste.

Even after Microsoft reported record earnings a few days ago, one of its former executives has effectively written the company's obituary in a NYT op - ed piece.

This study seems to build on Professor Dweck's Op Ed in The New York Times a few years ago which I, and other researchers, critiqued.