Sentences with phrase «few questions which»

Once the need for key employee life insurance has been established, there are a few questions which should be answered before you begin to shop for a policy.

They offer some graded death benefit plans which have no underwriting just ask you few questions which are addressed towards severe conditions.

However, you may have a few questions which hinder you from applying for a student loan forgiveness program.

He gave us lots of information so we only needed to ask a few questions which he answered well.

The sign - up process takes less than three minutes and includes answering a few questions which can later help in providing you matches based on your desires and sexual preferences.

There are also a few questions which may surprise you, such as whether your parents are still married.

You will need to answer few questions which usually meant to assess your personality.

Starting from the document's fundament we will point to a few questions which might occur after confronting it:

Unfortunately, these are but a few questions which opponents of the current DOD policy do not wish to consider.

Not exact matches

It's a multi-layered case, but there are a few pressing questions which people are most eager to hear answers to.

Which raises the question of politics: There are few organizations larger than the United States, after all.

When we answer a few simple questions to let our friends and family know which Muppet character we're the most like or which car we'd drive if we had our pick, we're sharing a digital piece of our analog lives.

• StatMuse is available as an iOS app, but the voice platform will launch on Amazon Alexa in the next few weeks, which means you could ask your Echo a question and hear Peyton Manning's voice instead of Alexa's.

All of which adds another few bricks to the already rock - solid case for the industry needing to attract and retain more female founders, but it also raises the question of whether male cluelessness ends withentrepreneurs.

Each of the stores has a few LoweBots apiece, which employ natural - language processing to respond to questions from customers, which can be anything from «What part of the store has lightbulbs?»

«You'd think who's alive and who's dead would be one of the few questions on which all of American society could have clarity and consistency on.»

Every tech company has increased political spending over the last few years, and the amount of tech money circulating in D.C. will skyrocket now that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been hauled before Congress to answer questions about the myriad ways in which his company is harming America and the world.

They will ask you many questions for which you fill in information from your receipt, select your answer from a list of given options, or write a few sentances to give details.

SolarCity, which Musk had sold as Tesla's Next Big Thing just a few months earlier, barely comes up on the 80 - minute call, garnering just two brief questions.

During the past few years, we've received quite a few questions on which membership plan may be most appropriate.

I would be delighted to follow up my appearance on Midpoint: Question Everything with Ed Berliner, in which Ed and I discussed the economic issues around immigration policy, with a few points and references.

Roth vs. Traditional IRA Evaluator Answer a few questions about yourself to help find out which type of IRA may be right for you.

I will not answer this question in a quantitative way, which may disappoint those who want numerical forecasts; in fact, I will be making a few criticisms of the simple models that are often employed for this purpose.

Our IRA Evaluator allows you to answer a few questions and find out which one might be right for you or compare a Roth IRA to a Traditional IRA.

There are myriad questions that have yet to be answered, which is why it is hardly surprising that so few Bitcoin and cryptocurrency investors have paid taxes on their holdings.

«Such social doctrine provides directions but, with few exceptions (for instance, the defense of innocent human life), does not provide directives of immediate applicability to policy questions on which people of good faith, guided by reason and conscience, can come to different conclusions.»

A few years ago, the journalist Philip Nobile wrote an article near the first anniversary of the death of Princess Diana in which he raised what he termed «an indiscreet theological question.»

One Parisian clairvoyant supposedly told him that «in a few years you will take part in a political assassination,» which raises the question whether she predicted the future or he killed Rasputin to vindicate her prediction.

this system of spiritual beings is a multi-staged hierarchy, which spans 50 dimensions and every spiritual plane attached to these dimensions, with a supreme, male god - being who is above the 50th dimension, and many of these beings pretend to be «good» but are manipulators who impose suffering, and through brainwashing, force, and authority / domination, they condition people to believe that suffering is «good» for a «learning experience» (read the article that is in the link i shared) but i am left wondering why so few actually question this?

Now, which hypothesis requires the fewest assumptions to answer all these questions?

However, in today's world, subject to so many rapid changes and shaken by questions of deep relevance for the life of faith, in order to govern the bark of Saint Peter and proclaim the Gospel, both strength of mind and body are necessary, strength which in the last few months, has deteriorated in me to the extent that I have had to recognize my incapacity to adequately fulfill the ministry entrusted to me.

And to find true Christianity is likewise quite easy by asking just a few questions (the first of which eliminates the vast majority of professing Christians / denominations).

The saying is, in fact, one of the very few sayings in the tradition, the authenticity of which has not been seriously questioned in more than half a century of intensive discussion of Jesus» eschatological teaching.

While I am not religious (I will call myself agnostic), and having an IQ well over genius levels, with scientific and mathematical tendencies, let me ask you a few questions, because what I see here are a bunch of people talking about «no evidence» or «proof» of God's existence, therefore He can't possibly exist, existential arguments, which are not arguments, but fearful, clouded alterations of a truth that can not be seen.

Or this: «Why do our evangelical theologies give so much attention to questions relating to only a few obscure biblical texts while completely ignoring the topic of «poorology» to which are devoted hundreds of clear texts?»)

The first few moments I dimly recall, the thermometer being stuck into my mouth, the gray band being wrapped around my arm to take blood pressure, and the series of annoying questions being asked about my health insurance policy (which I thankfully reassured myself, even in that debilitated state, would very soon be a thing of the past).

The way of the master is an evangilism method in which an individual takes a few questions and asks them to another individual who is trying to get a realistic understanding of who God is and how Jesus Christ offers us the gift of salvation and eternal life.

If unsupported by a theory, a law stating relationships between variables which are relatively «observable» will be thrown into question by a few persistent discrepancies.

We have said something about the place of the Bible in the living Christian tradition which preachers represent and for which they function; we have discussed a few of the problems or questions which are raised both for preachers and for people; and we have tried to sum up the theological and moral implications of the gospel as these have been worked out in the tradition down the centuries.

And as I finally find myself settling into something of a steady rhythm of faith (dappled, as always, with doubt), it is made all the sweeter by the steadfast love of my mom and dad, which is one of the few things in the world I have never had to question.

So thinks the Pew Research Center, which today released the second wave of a massive study designed to «fill the gap» left by the United States census (no questions on religion), the self - reporting of denominations («widely differing criteria»), and smaller surveys (too few questions or people).

Famed apologist Ravi Zacharias has spent the past few weeks embroiled in a complex scandal in which he has had to defend himself from both accusations of inappropriate online conduct with a woman and questions about the authenticity of his credentials.

In the course of this time the position has changed from one in which only a few scholars questioned the historicity of the empty tomb to one in which this story is widely accepted as a legend.

It is quite possible to question it, all the more so as the change of view has taken place more rapidly in the oral teaching of lectures (which are much more numerous and livelier than printed textbooks), than in printed books, which are few and always voice the views of only a small number of theologians.

I would have appreciated some discussion of the contribution of Tradition on these questions, especially St Augustine's views, which just get a few rather disparaging mentions.

Without seeming to «grill» the person, which would make him defensive, a few of these questions can be sprinkled into the discussion, followed by the observation that these are some of the typical early symptoms of problem drinking or alcoholism.

In response to the cruelties of New World slavery, which popes initially endorsed, some a few 16th - century Dominicans started questioning the morality of slavery.

In his later service as prime minister, Begin is best known for ceding the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt in exchange for a peace treaty, a widely praised accomplishment, though its wisdom (which not a few far - sighted people questioned at the time) seems less evident now with the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

With the coming of television, people were further encouraged to meet the needs of capitalism: to consume without end, to use up, throw away and buy again; to repress individuality so as to not question the process which provided an endless stream of products; to seek the immediate and the sensational, changing the channel every few seconds if it did not provide immediate stimulation; and, above all, never to ask questions about the real meaning of the system itself.

I grew up in the 1930s and early 1940s in a milieu in which there were few questions about Protestant Christianity or what were taken to be traditional American values.