Not exact matches
In contrast to earlier
observations the team did not observe dust that will later form into planets, but dust created in collisions between small planets of a
few kilometres in size — objects called planetesimals that are
similar to the asteroids and comets of the Solar System.
He posted a request for
similar observations on mammalwatching.com, a website for amateur mammalogists comparable to birdwatching websites, and received a
few more such reports.
The densities and chemical compositions of the two rocky planets are also
similar, and radar
observations found that Venus has relatively
few craters indicating a relatively young or quickly changing surface like Earth.
Quite a
few authors over on KBoards are reporting a
similar observation.
One might have made a
similar observation a
few years ago about Martin Kippenberger, whose posthumous revival earned him a legion of young imitators and megaprices at auction.
Although some earlier work along
similar lines had been done by other paleoclimate researchers (Ed Cook, Phil Jones, Keith Briffa, Ray Bradley, Malcolm Hughes, and Henry Diaz being just a
few examples), before Mike, no one had seriously attempted to use all the available paleoclimate data together, to try to reconstruct the global patterns of climate back in time before the start of direct instrumental
observations of climate, or to estimate the underlying statistical uncertainties in reconstructing past temperature changes.
Is my
observation due to a sampling error (only a
few hundred people) or have others noticed a
similar pattern?
Similar claims that the IPCC projection of about 0.2 ºC / dec over the next
few decades would be falsified with such an
observation are equally bogus.
So, to reply to your original
observation: It may well happen that one station gets warmer and one a
few kilometers away gets colder, for example because the land use around it changes (from agriculture to growing forests or
similar, but often it's perhaps not even an obvious change).